SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : A Study of Covered Strangle in a Rather Neutral Market
QCOM 168.52-1.0%9:30 AM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: PAL who wrote (8)8/20/2001 2:58:10 AM
From: PAL  Read Replies (1) of 23
 
Remember that the three scenarios produce the following portoflios:

a. 100% cash/short put : 2,000 qcom + 1,400

b. covered strangle : 2,000 qcom - 2,350

c. buy/write : 1,800 qcom + 5,510

in a down market a) is definitely better than b) because you have the same number of shares but b) has a margin debit balance.

If the market really is under severe pressure, then a) and b) will suffer greater losses than c) since they have more shares.

At what point will the portfolio holdings of a) and b) be smaller than c)?

a) vs c)

2000 X + 1,400 = 1,800 X + 5,510
200 X = 4,110
x = 20.55

b) vs c)

2000 x - 2,350 = 1,880 X + 5,510
200 x = 7,860
x = 39.3

Therefore, the lines of a) and c) intersect at 20.55 and the lines of b) and c) intersect at 39.3
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext