SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Computer Associates
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5232 59 0 CA
Emcee:  Everard Taylor Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5207No sniping commentary necessary from me. The article speaks for itself... onlinEL KABONG!!!-2/15/2006
5206I called CA today for product information. The message said they were off today Peter Dierks-2/22/2005
5205Computer Associates CEO Gets Pay Package Wednesday November 24, 4:59 pm ET ByTEDennis-11/24/2004
5204'bout time!David Lawrence-9/24/2004
5203Ex-Computer Associates CEO Kumar Indicted September 22, 2004 3:02 PM ET By FRATEDennis-9/22/2004
5202Ha! One of the reasons I left the "inner circle" of CA was that it haTEDennis-4/24/2004
5201Their ideal candidate is probably some on-again, off-again retired old fart stucBill Ulrich-4/24/2004
5200Bring back Glen Chatfield. Glen would bring more class to the company than it hapae-4/23/2004
5199<b>Commentary: Computer Associates...Well, It's A Start</b> FroTEDennis-4/23/2004
5198"...Sanjay Kumar was forced to resign Wednesday as chairman and chief execuBill Ulrich-4/21/2004
5197Oops. You're right. I read that 3 times before I posted it and got the samTEDennis-4/11/2004
5196TED, I think you may have misread that. It only referred to Wang and Kumar in teDavid Lawrence-4/11/2004
5195re: I think CA is in decline, just like their products. But it's a slow deaTEDennis-4/9/2004
5194that's not a change <g>Box-By-The-Riviera™-10/23/2003
5193gettin a bit cynical are we? ~DEER HUNTER-10/22/2003
5192ca posts loss of 87 million looks like they are going into a bad period, but noBox-By-The-Riviera™-10/22/2003
5191he's like the energizer bunny. maybe a delivery van will run him over.Box-By-The-Riviera™-10/19/2003
5190One day I love em the next day I hate em. I wish this whole thing would just wasDEER HUNTER-10/17/2003
5189<i>It's really quite simple. They by software that's relatively maMark Marcellus-10/10/2003
5188re: They buy software that's relatively mature in its life cycle, repackage TEDennis-10/10/2003
5187<i>>>If they lied about that, how do you know that they didn't lDavid Lawrence-10/10/2003
5186<i>The revenues in question were real, just booked a quarter early</i&gMark Marcellus-10/9/2003
5185exactlyBox-By-The-Riviera™-10/9/2003
5184When is the last time you saw a software company's market capitalization basDavid Lawrence-10/9/2003
5183no way. climate has changed and tolerance for the sanjay antics has passed its Box-By-The-Riviera™-10/9/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):