We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  For example, here is how to disable FireFox ad content blocking while on Silicon Investor.
Technology Stocks
OLED Universal Display Corp
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
22852 328 7 OLED
Emcee:  slacker711 Type:  Moderated
The rules for this thread are fairly simple. Anything and everything related to UDC and/or OLED's is fair game. That includes both fundamental and technical analysis. Comments and posts about the general display industry and competitive technologies are also welcome.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on UDC. For example, the IMPACT of corporate tax reform or increased tariffs would be fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether cutting taxes or increasing tariffs is a good or bad policy idea.

The key rule is to keep it civil. That means no trolling, flaming, or taunting. Disagreements can be fierce without crossing the line into the personal.

Longs, shorts, and those just interested in the technology/company are welcome. Just have an opinion and be prepared to defend it.

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
22852The PSTADF numbers look really good. I searched for patents, and it appears thaR. Monte Gu-an hour ago
22851I do believe OLED is highly valued at its current price. That's not to say iAshled-2 hours ago
22850Congrats! So you are not waiting for Blue :). I really do wonder how richly ggamer-4 hours ago
22849Today, I sold all of my ~4,600 long-term shares at $204.00. I averaged my total Ashled25 hours ago
22848I get the sense that all current available capacity and capacity coming on line Dkjunior143-yesterday
22847There isnt much reason to project any revenue from lighting going forward. OTOHslacker711-yesterday
22846What. A. Run. Dance hamsters dance! :-) [youtube video]slacker7113yesterday
22845Is it just me, or does lighting revenue appear to fade off into oblivion in thatDkjunior143-yesterday
22843Updates from UDC about blue?occams_phasor1yesterday
22842PREPARE. THE. HAMSTERS. End of message.Dkjunior1433yesterday
22840DSSC just sent out materials forecast. Based on the existing supplier matrix, tmikeemarc1yesterday
22839I am talking about the deferred revenue. They have the money for this year. Th"Rog"-yesterday
22838Samsung has already give Universal the money. Are you proposing that Samsung alDkjunior143-yesterday
22837A deep blue TADF with a lifetime of 1000 hours at 1000 cd/m2. The two authors aslacker7115yesterday
22836Think you are looking at it wrong. Samsung has already give Universal the money"Rog"-yesterday
22835Samsung Display to launch ‘Project C’ Investment into large OLEDs to be decidedynotgoal7yesterday
22834Sounds like a plan! Go OLED Go,litespeed2011-Sunday
22833I was all ready for the hamsters to dance when the stock was over 200, but I couslacker7116Sunday
22832I stand corrected. I believed shall indicated an imperative. Thanks.A.J. Mullen-last Saturday
22831It seems 'must' indicates a legal obligation....'shall' being amSavant-last Saturday
22830Should because it's morally right, or because a legal contract specifies shaA.J. Mullen1last Saturday
22829Yes, UDC should receive part of the compensation from Samsung since Samsung rectech101-last Saturday
22828I think someone already asked if Samsung would have pay any of the compensation A.J. Mullen-last Friday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):