SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Failure To Deliver, Oustanding & Flow
An SI Board Since May 2024
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
0 0 0 NNOX
Emcee:  Lawrence Burg Type:  Moderated
Looking at FTDs and their spikes during stock price rises. more to follow.

Ultimately its wrong, and discussion that it brings liquidity and fairness to trading is horses--t. if somenone is borrowing shares without the ability for buy/pay them back, in full, it's fraud.

ultimately the action from this thread woul dbe to file suit against the SEC/FINRA to enforce the revcovery of the FTD values, and cease have them writeen off by brokers, and of course to allow the free market and trading volatility return to the control of the broader market participants.

My personal beef at the moment is with NNOX, which has seen 19M FTDs in the last 12 months, specifically synced to price spikes. At an average volume wieghted price of $12, that equates to $220M that someone has walked off with. Where did it go? who was affected? who else has motivation to see the sloppy enforecement of this fraud reigned in?

that's my effort here.
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):