SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
ImmunityBio converts from Immunomedics
An SI Board Since February 2023
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
174 26 0 IBRX
Emcee:  TinfoilHat Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Investor in IBRX who previously benefited from crowd-sourced knowledge from the moderated Immunomedics forum
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
174A Seeking Alpha article from a few weeks ago. I asked the author (who as the diFitzhughlaw3Wednesday
173Sorry, that neighbor that I talked to said the trailer was placed about 3 or 4 wmannamal-Tuesday
172FWIW, last November I drove by the Dunkirk building. I was disappointed to see mannamal-Tuesday
171Always looking for signs of a reversal, and retail selling is usually one. ThankTinfoilHat3May 25
170I sold my small position...thankfully my investment was in the green. I usuallycharles39-May 24
169I thought the debt can be converted to shares, no? What makes you think it mustTinfoilHat-May 19
168Your valuation appears to be spot on...how its the financials that concerns me. charles39-May 18
167Well shit, now I need to do some homework on this investment. Finally found theTinfoilHat8May 13
166I just read this quickly. Nothing new, little pipeline platform info, but a faiStanley Lake 92-May 12
165We just don't know what is the MFG issues the FDA is concerned with...it coucharles391May 11
164SESN flashbacks for sure although this is a much different co. I had a new trucStanley Lake 92-May 11
163My read on that statement is this being a new drug, and FDAs responsibility to eTinfoilHat3May 11
162Having lived through the Sesen CRL, this one is much less concerning to me for aMaturin1May 11
161What I think you missed is PSS only gave $30M, which recent burn rate implies a TinfoilHat1May 11
160If I'm reading this correctly: Bad news: The company has some manufacturingzagnut13May 11
159Sec filing.....(sorry for the pesky ads.) marketscreener.comcharles39-May 11
158Hey JJINV, saw this post and should have sent a private message, but my inner voTinfoilHat3May 11
157who knows... nothing to do with the drug. a third party facility :: whateverJJINV-May 11
156Highly unlikely a BP would commit a large upfront with the said issues outstandicharles391May 11
155"ImmunityBio, which previously said it was exploring a partnership with a lJJINV-May 11
154So it'll take about 9-12 months to resolve this...meeting with FDA....resolvcharles39-May 11
153This just reinforces that during the "risk phases", while they're The Ox-May 11
152Gut punchmannamal-May 11
151Not another MFG issue... IMMU here we go again In a letter to the company on TDavidoff1May 11
150well, CRL... blow me timbers. "*Immunitybio Said Received A Complete RespJJINV-May 11
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2023 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by IEX, Alpha Vantage, Coinbase, Binance, Fintel and CityFALCON News