SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
01 Communique
An SI Board Since April 2008
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
18 0 0 ONE
Emcee:  slaag Type:  Moderated
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
18Civil Action No01:10-cv-1007 01 v Plaintiff LogMeIn Inc ORDER The judge Clauslaag-11/18/2010
17Patent Litigation Extra: Heavy Hitters Back Microsoft Supreme Court Bid in i4i Cslaag-10/19/2010
16Nobody watching this eh? Making a huge move.slaag-7/27/2010
15Watching Bilski. SCOTUS to hear Bilski case, may be huge for software patents Tslaag-6/2/2009
14Judge rejects stay as too lengthy. Hummmm... E.D. Tex. Losing Confidence in PTOslaag-4/17/2009
13USPTO Announces New Reexamination Unit In a press release issued on July 29, 20slaag-3/10/2009
12excerpts pdf 60-73 Consider The Likely Timing Of TheReexamination. Reexaminatioslaag-2/8/2009
11Google plans to make PCs history. Industry critics warn of danger in giving inteslaag-1/26/2009
10Are Inter-Partes Reexams Losing Their "Staying Power"? ESN v. Cisco Sslaag-12/2/2008
9Wegner: 10 Steps to Reform Inter Partes Reexamination Thursday, November 13, 200slaag-11/14/2008
8Success or Failure rate of 73%. This doesn`t mention 01 directly but it is indicslaag-8/26/2008
7The Advantages of Inter Partes Reexamination Conventional wisdom used to be thslaag-8/6/2008
6worst case scenario. Inter partes - 5 to 8 years from ipbiz by Lawrence B. Ebertslaag-6/18/2008
5inter partes delays Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog Wednesday, May 21, 2008 Aslaag-5/21/2008
401`s Canadian attorney; Miller Thompson 6,928,479, Reexam. C.N. 95/001,018, slaag-4/21/2008
3Judge`s decision and comments UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OFslaag-4/15/2008
2Inter partes re-examinations Pre-litigation Strategies: Patent Reexamination Bslaag-4/12/2008
1Challenging Patent Validity: Microsoft Asks Supreme Court to Reduce "Clear slaag-4/8/2008
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):