We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Advanced Micro vs Intel (AMD / INTC)
An SI Board Since March 2007
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2581 33 0 ^SOX
Emcee:  rupert1 Type:  Moderated
AMD's antitrust suit against Intel dramatizes the competition between the two companies.

They compete on technology, manufacturing, design wins and distribution. They go head-to-head in most of the world's markets. They compete for partners and associates, for investment funds and for the favour of the financial markets.

This board is about the competition between AMD and Intel and the consequences it has for all investors.

As such it is not the "home board" either of AMD or Intel investors. In SI terms, it is not a "Bulls" or "Bears" board. All investors, including the non-committed, are equally welcome.

Moderation will be liberal to encourage searching questions and open discussion in a lively and pleasant atmosphere. I will rely heavily on the self-discipline and experience of posters.

Any board can be negatively affected by posters who are often off-topic,or who bait others in a personal or insulting manner,or post often without content. I do not expect to be asked to deal with occasional lapses. But if there are persistent offenders I will use bans of increasing duration.


Current Quotes:

Company HQ:
iHUB Forum:
iHUB Strictly Moderated Forum:


Current Quotes:

Company HQ:
iHUB Forum:


Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2580"You're a genius." Thank you.combjelly-5/9/2009
2579Jello, Re: "In general, yes. Sometimes by quite a bit." You're aYousef-5/9/2009
2578"nano outperforms the atom doesn't it?" In general, yes. Sometimecombjelly-1/15/2009
2577nano outperforms the atom doesn't it?Jim McMannis-1/15/2009
2576I read where the mini notebooks will be dropping to $200-$300 shortly. Right nowJim McMannis-1/15/2009
2575How's oil doing? how long can amd survive w/o a competitor to tinycore? :)tecate78732-11/11/2008
2574How's the 'new' world going there ateffie.tecate78732-11/11/2008
2573<b>This Abu Dhabi investment will not last long..</b> Care to reconAtef Il Ibrahim-10/7/2008
2572Dear CJ: The ones for MIDs use a different chipset built by SIS with the PowerVpgerassi-8/20/2008
2571When AMD has the superior CPUs and chipsets for netbooks, why do we have this fadr_elis-8/16/2008
2570"Unfortunately for you, a third party tester has found that Atom systems uscombjelly-8/15/2008
2569Dr_elis: Unfortunately for you, a third party tester has found that Atom systempgerassi-8/15/2008
2568The Atom maybe slow but consumers like Atom-based netbooks/mini-notebooks a lot.dr_elis-8/14/2008
2567Wbmw: And the XO isn't a PC either. It has only 128MB of RAM. So how doespgerassi-8/14/2008
2566RE: Message 24843540 Wbmw you are wrong even more. The TDP quoted includes thepgerassi-8/13/2008
2565RE: Message 24843496 Classmate hasn't sold them yet. 300K XOs were sold bypgerassi-8/13/2008
2564NopeJim McMannis-2/11/2008
2563Mas is Jimmy, how quaint.tecate78732-2/10/2008
2562Price of not executing at 65nm in either process or design. Information from Pmas_-2/9/2008
2561What the heck are they doing at AMD? Sitting around all day? It's like the kJim McMannis-2/8/2008
2560Hey Jimmy, Re: "nope some sad Intel/DeMone fanboi is ;-)." Have you Yousef-2/8/2008
2559doug, re Message 23089418 You do realise that all this info which you are now smas_-1/21/2008
2558speaking of which up pops another one ;-)mas_-1/21/2008
2557so said by a ChucklesD/AMD fanbois himself.tecate78732-1/19/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):