|We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. For example, here is how to disable FireFox ad content blocking while on Silicon Investor.|
GREAT WEBSITE - JOIN AND DONATE
Write directly to the new President and his team about these issues
GREAT NEW MESSAGE BOARDS FOR DISCUSSION OF ALL THESE ISSUES
MUST READING FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO GET A BACKGROUND ON THE ISSUES
AS WELL AS THE MO OF THOSE WHO DEFEND MANIPULATION ON THE SHORT SIDE.
WARNING, NOT FOR THOSE WITH WEAK STOMACHS.
(CRIME OF THE CENTURY
The Truth About Naked Short Selling in Juniors)
"Crime of the Century"
Audio Presentation - tinyurl.com
Further, it is important to reserve judgment and to think for yourself
on these complicated issues.
If one is to be ojective, Cramer is vilified often but has been shown
to be pretty fair, transparent and the source of revelations, good ideas
**** thestreet.com *****
Sign this petition also for MARKET REFORM.
Best summaries of the issues
Discussion is encouraged about this issue. Is it a myth or one of the greatest financial scams of the new century? Who is involved? Hedge funds, management, touts, market makers? Why are shorts so upset when the subject is raised? Why do "bashers" bash?
Sources of information
See their message board at
Message boards on IHUB where NAKED SHORTING IS DISCUSSED
Courtesy of DVDW - Locard's theory -
BCIT - a unique case of massive fails to deliver where stock was counterfeited
This thread is not intended to be one to bash members of SI, particularly because of their stock pics.
This thread is not intended to be one just to bash stock picks. Negative posts, ideally, should have links to filings or accurate statements of facts. A statement that XYZQ is a POS will likely cause the dreaded "BAN," perhaps with a prior warning, but maybe not.
Financers, vulture or otherwise, equity investors such as PIPE's, etc. I'd prefer something like "Here is a deal that may lead to lots of potential dilution. This financer has a history of doing them and then provide some links." I'd prefer that we don't have blanket statements that ALL their deals "suck," but maybe all their deals do, in fact, suck.
Touts, bashers, promoters, IR - etc. I would welcome posts from anybody, even if connected to a company, with opinions and factual links. For example, "This is a good promotion because the promoter is only getting a one time payment of $5000." or This is a SHAREHOLDER-FRIENDLY management. They are in there with shareholders and not raping shareholders with massive dilution. Their salaries and perks are reasonable, etc.
THIS IS NOT INTENDED AS A THREAD JUST TO POINT OUT BAD STUFF ALTHOUGH THAT IS HUMAN NATURE. LET'S FIND SOME COMPANIES THAT CAN BE CALLED "SHAREHOLDER FRIENDLY." Many consider those last 2 words to be an oxymoron, so let's see if we can find some that can be considered relatively friendly to us small retail investors.
Disagreements - Once opinions start getting repetitive, without adding anything, they start to become just mindless bashing and we all have been there. Warnings and ultimate "bans," may be remedies.
Legal CYA - no legal advice or opinions and no recommendations to buy, sell, hold, or just stare into the sun, (just checking to see if you are awake) are provided on any message boards. Anyone who relies on message board posters deserves and will likely lose all their money and wind up sitting in a homeless shelter, with no friends or relatives admitting to even know his or her name. Consider everything posted here and elsewhere on the internet as being from someone with his own personal agenda, misdirected, wrong, a lie, foolish, or some combination thereof.
|© 2019 Knight Sac Media. Data provided by IEX, Alpha Vantage, Coinbase, Binance, Fintel and CityFALCON News|