We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Blank Check IPOs (SPACS)
An SI Board Since January 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3852 140 0 SPACS
Emcee:  Glenn Petersen Type:  Moderated

Wall Street has never been bashful about recycling old products and concepts. One of the recent concepts to be recycled is the blank check IPO. Blank check companies are also known as Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACS).

A blank check company is a development stage company that has been formed for no specific purpose other than to complete a merger or acquisition with an operating entity, the identity of which is unknown when the company is formed. Because such transactions generally, but not always, trigger a change of control, with the shareholders of the acquired company now owning more than 50% of the combined entities, the majority of these transactions are accounted for as reverse mergers.

Blank check IPOs had a run of popularity during the 1980s. However, the abuses of that period, particularly the promotional activities of insiders looking to make a fast buck through the promotion of their stock rather than the acquisition of a viable business, led the SEC to place some significant restrictions on the practice.

The SEC has discouraged blank check IPOs with Rule 419, which regulates the issuance of “penny stock”, defined as shares priced below $5, by companies that are in the development stage. Rule 419 pertains to all companies with assets of less than $5 million. Because all of the recent offerings have been priced over $5 per unit and have each raised a minimum of $9 million in gross proceeds; the offerings have been exempt from the provisions of Rule 419.

The newly public blank check companies have been sensitive to the failures of their predecessors. To alleviate the concerns of potential investors, all of the recent offerings have voluntarily complied with most of the provisions of Rule 419 and the companies have been careful to structure the transactions so that the founders will not be in a position to enrich themselves at the expense of their new public shareholders.

Most of the funds raised in a blank check IPO are placed in a trust account and can only be released in the event that the company completes a business combination that wins approval from a majority of the company’s public shareholders. Depending on the individual company, a proposed transaction can be blocked if 20% to 40% of the non-insider shares are voted against the transaction. Regardless of the outcome of the vote on the proposed acquisition, dissenting shareholders have the option of having their shares redeemed in an amount that is equal to their pro rata share of the funds held in the trust account. If a transaction is not completed within a specified period that can range from eighteen to thirty months, the company will be liquidated with the proceeds distributed to the public shareholders. The insiders will not receive any of the proceeds.

All of these offerings have been artfully priced. Many of the early deals have been priced at $6 per unit, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and warrants to purchase two additional shares of common stock at $5 per share.

Subsequent to the IPOs, the common shares have generally traded at a slight discount to their liquidation value. When investing in these securities, the conservative play is to invest in the common shares, which are generally trading at or near their liquidation value. The worst-case scenario: You get your money back. The more speculative route would be to buy the warrants.

I would encourage everyone to do some due diligence before purchasing any of these securities. They are speculative. Deals do crater before they are approved and there have been a lot of bad acquisitions. If you do purchase any of these securities, please do not allocate a significant portion of your investment portfolio. It might also be advisable to buy a basket of securities, rather than focusing on one company.

At the very least, the following risk factors should be taken into consideration:

-- Many reverse mergers fail. Companies that go public via this route generally do so because they would be unable to complete a traditional IPO. However, the magnitude of the dollars currently being raised in these offerings should mean that the newly public companies might be in a position to attract some decent acquisition candidates.

-- An investment in a blank check company is ultimately a bet that the management of the company will have the expertise to identify and close on the acquisition of a quality private entity. The last year has seen a significant upgrading in the management groups taking these companies public.

-- These securities are often very thinly traded. You are at the mercy of the market makers. Be very careful if you place an order.

Additional external resources

DealFlow's SPAC Newsletter

SPAC Insider (partial pay wall)

SPAC Track

SPAC Analytics

Wikipedia (Special Purpose Acquisition Company)

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3852Trump Sues MSNBC, Reuters and 18 Other News Orgs, Claims They ‘Coordinated’ in MBryan Saulamanca-November 21
3851Trump’s Truth Social Has Lost $73M Since Launch, New Filing Shows The company tGlenn Petersen-November 13
3850A SPAC deal that was doomed at birth: Faze Clan acquired for $17 million, one yGlenn Petersen1October 22
3849With honors.Glenn Petersen-October 13
3848TMTG CEO Devin Nunes said in a press release that terminating the PIPE was "kidl-October 13
3847UPDATE 1-SPAC to return remaining $533 million raise for Trump social media dealGlenn Petersen1October 13
3846Trump’s SPAC Loses Nearly $200 Million In Stock Purchase Deals Topline The embakidl1October 12
3845Bill Ackman reportedly said he would ‘absolutely’ do a deal with X with his new Glenn Petersen1October 1
3844Bill Ackman’s ‘SPARC’ gets OK from the SEC and he’s ready for a deal: ‘please caGlenn Petersen1September 29
3843Truth Social investment partner DWAC win extension for merger - The Washington Pkidl-September 5
3842Trump Media’s proposed merger partner Digital World faces crucial vote - The Waskidl1September 2
3841"NIO, XPEV, LI, BYD.. China's Quads Message Board - Msg: 34401032 (silikidl-August 31
3840Aurora Acquisition peaked at $58.24; tanked to $1.15. Two articles. Glenn Petersen1August 25
3839A small float. There may have been a short squeeze. When Back Spade went public,Glenn Petersen-August 14
3838BSAQ ... Right back the where it came from in just 3 trading days. The usual SPAkidl-August 14
3837BSAQ is up approximately 90% this afternoon.Glenn Petersen-August 10
3836Vietnamese EV maker VinFast gets go ahead for Nasdaq SPAC listing | Reuterskidl2August 10
3835Fascinating. Break the rules. Pay a fine. Carry on. The SEC is a very sick jokekidl-July 20
3834Energy Northwest, X-Energy Agree to Develop 12 Small Modular Reactors By DanielGlenn Petersen3July 20
3833DWAC up approximately 30% in AH trading. SPAC Tied to Trump’s Media Company WilGlenn Petersen1July 20
3832Energy Northwest to use X-energy reactor(s) at Washington State site .. yahoo.cTriffin-July 19
3831If the DWAC deal ever closes, the redemptions will be high. The $1 billion PIPE Glenn Petersen2July 16
3830DWAC ... Trump NFTs, Hotel Sale: New Report Details $1 Billion in Income - BNN kidl-July 15
3829ALCC and OKLO .. Sam Altman OpenAI CEO has been backing this nuke startup sinTriffin-July 11
3828The Post did a good job of summarizing the situation. Still a lot of hoops to juGlenn Petersen-July 4
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):