We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Blank Check IPOs (SPACS)
An SI Board Since January 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3578 146 0 SPACS
Emcee:  Glenn Petersen Type:  Moderated

Wall Street has never been bashful about recycling old products and concepts. One of the recent concepts to be recycled is the blank check IPO. Blank check companies are also known as Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACS).

A blank check company is a development stage company that has been formed for no specific purpose other than to complete a merger or acquisition with an operating entity, the identity of which is unknown when the company is formed. Because such transactions generally, but not always, trigger a change of control, with the shareholders of the acquired company now owning more than 50% of the combined entities, the majority of these transactions are accounted for as reverse mergers.

Blank check IPOs had a run of popularity during the 1980s. However, the abuses of that period, particularly the promotional activities of insiders looking to make a fast buck through the promotion of their stock rather than the acquisition of a viable business, led the SEC to place some significant restrictions on the practice.

The SEC has discouraged blank check IPOs with Rule 419, which regulates the issuance of “penny stock”, defined as shares priced below $5, by companies that are in the development stage. Rule 419 pertains to all companies with assets of less than $5 million. Because all of the recent offerings have been priced over $5 per unit and have each raised a minimum of $9 million in gross proceeds; the offerings have been exempt from the provisions of Rule 419.

The newly public blank check companies have been sensitive to the failures of their predecessors. To alleviate the concerns of potential investors, all of the recent offerings have voluntarily complied with most of the provisions of Rule 419 and the companies have been careful to structure the transactions so that the founders will not be in a position to enrich themselves at the expense of their new public shareholders.

Most of the funds raised in a blank check IPO are placed in a trust account and can only be released in the event that the company completes a business combination that wins approval from a majority of the company’s public shareholders. Depending on the individual company, a proposed transaction can be blocked if 20% to 40% of the non-insider shares are voted against the transaction. Regardless of the outcome of the vote on the proposed acquisition, dissenting shareholders have the option of having their shares redeemed in an amount that is equal to their pro rata share of the funds held in the trust account. If a transaction is not completed within a specified period that can range from eighteen to thirty months, the company will be liquidated with the proceeds distributed to the public shareholders. The insiders will not receive any of the proceeds.

All of these offerings have been artfully priced. Many of the early deals have been priced at $6 per unit, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and warrants to purchase two additional shares of common stock at $5 per share.

Subsequent to the IPOs, the common shares have generally traded at a slight discount to their liquidation value. When investing in these securities, the conservative play is to invest in the common shares, which are generally trading at or near their liquidation value. The worst-case scenario: You get your money back. The more speculative route would be to buy the warrants.

I would encourage everyone to do some due diligence before purchasing any of these securities. They are speculative. Deals do crater before they are approved and there have been a lot of bad acquisitions. If you do purchase any of these securities, please do not allocate a significant portion of your investment portfolio. It might also be advisable to buy a basket of securities, rather than focusing on one company.

At the very least, the following risk factors should be taken into consideration:

-- Many reverse mergers fail. Companies that go public via this route generally do so because they would be unable to complete a traditional IPO. However, the magnitude of the dollars currently being raised in these offerings should mean that the newly public companies might be in a position to attract some decent acquisition candidates.

-- An investment in a blank check company is ultimately a bet that the management of the company will have the expertise to identify and close on the acquisition of a quality private entity. The last year has seen a significant upgrading in the management groups taking these companies public.

-- These securities are often very thinly traded. You are at the mercy of the market makers. Be very careful if you place an order.

Additional external resources

DealFlow's SPAC Newsletter

SPAC Insider (partial pay wall)

SPAC Track

SPAC Analytics

Wikipedia (Special Purpose Acquisition Company)

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3578DOJ and SEC send warning to SPACs with criminal charges against Nikola founder TGlenn Petersen1yesterday
3577While the Robinhood IPO turned out to be a short term bust, the chart at the botGlenn Petersen2last Friday
3576TPG Pace Solutions Corp. (stock symbol: TPGS), a SPAC that raised $285 million wGlenn Petersen-last Thursday
3575The Sevl / Queen's Gambit merger has been confirmed. An interesting businessGlenn Petersen-last Wednesday
3574The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Queen's Gambit Growth Capital (stoGlenn Petersen-last Wednesday
3573How the hell do you make money in the bike/scooter share niche? Maybe some day skidl-July 25
3572The Bird / Switchback transaction was announced over two months ago. I am postinGlenn Petersen-July 25
3571CCIV is up $1.35 in premarket trading.Glenn Petersen-July 23
3570Churchill Capital Corp IV Stockholders Approve Lucid Business Combination -- Thkidl-July 23
3569Lucid Motors SPAC deal delayed by possible spam issue | Seeking Alpha The commeThehammer-July 23
3568EV Startup Lucid Risks SPAC Deal Collapse on No-Show Holders I am wondering if Thehammer-July 23
3567EV Startup Lucid Risks SPAC Deal Collapse on No-Show Holders July 22, 2021, 4:5kidl2July 23
3566SPACs getting dumped ahead of symbol change day.. [graphic] THCB to trade as MTriffin-July 22
3565Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp. (stock symbol: XPDI), a SPAGlenn Petersen-July 21
3564<b>SPACs That Closed Below Trust NAV</b> [graphic] [graphic] [graTriffin1July 19
3563Th Wall Street Journal is reporting that ECP Environmental Growth Opportunities Glenn Petersen-July 19
3562Ackman SPAC Decides Against Buying 10% Stake in Universal Music Deal valued worGlenn Petersen-July 19
3561The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Altimir Acquisition Corp. II (stock syGlenn Petersen-July 16
3560Pathfinder Acquisition Corp. (stock symbol: PFDR), a SPAC that raised $325 milliGlenn Petersen-July 15
3559Reinvent Technology Partners Y (stock symbol: RTPY), a SPAC that raised $977.5 mGlenn Petersen-July 15
3558SES, a Lithium-Metal Battery Supplier for Electric Vehicles, to List on NYSE viaJulius Wong1July 13
3557<b>SPACs That Closed Below Trust NAV</b> [graphic] [graphic] [graphTriffin2July 10
3556The "hybrid" direct listing is here — and still waiting Kia KokalitchGlenn Petersen3July 10
3555Benchmark’s Bill Gurley says SPACs are ‘remarkably cheap compared to mispriced IGlenn Petersen-July 9
3554Far Peak Acquisition Corp. (stock symbol: FPAC), a SPAC that raised $600 millionGlenn Petersen-July 9
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):