![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level. |
![]()
Primary Rules: 1.) Keep it clean. 2.) Keep it as objective as possible. 3.) Keep it relatively civil. 4.) Try to kiss and make up after you eventually blow your top in a heated debate.. And most importantly... 5.) Remember it's only a debating thread, not the UN.. I like to put ideas out there for public consumption which I feel are logically supported by facts. I WANT others to analyze my views and indicate other perspectives which I should incorporate. I hope others adher to the same belief that, only through debating with facts, not just rhetoric, we can all gain a better understanding of how Foreign Policy is influenced by various factors. Other than that, we should all welcome a lively debate representing all realistic and objective perspectives (no Chomskyites). But be prepared to defend your beliefs and opinions, just as I am, and include documentation and/or links ... I certainly won't throw you into FADT "jail" merely for publicly calling into question something I say (so long as your response is logically supported by facts, even if incorrect)... Current essays on Nationalism (My pet interest): Message 18771510 Hawk | ||||||||||||
|
Home | Hot | SubjectMarks | PeopleMarks | Keepers | Settings |
Terms Of Use | Contact Us | Copyright/IP Policy | Privacy Policy | About Us | FAQ | Advertise on SI |
© 2021 Knight Sac Media. Data provided by IEX, Alpha Vantage, Coinbase, Binance, Fintel and CityFALCON News |