SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
199265 1072 8 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
199265Startup Tenstorrent has takeover interest from Intel and Q: tradingview.com60HzEE-25 minutes ago
199264FWIW; Melius Research raised its 12-month price target for Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOGR8FORM-an hour ago
199263Or the customer may have simply said. Please don’t mention our name until this tBDAZZ13 hours ago
199262Art, re: My use of Gemini WRT QCOM forecasts, etc.-----------------------------Jim Mullens24 hours ago
199261I ran through a similar action prior to the universal extension of the trial datOptntrdr199916 hours ago
199260The Gemini outlook, while it sounds good for us long term QCOM investors, is purArt Bechhoefer17 hours ago
199259Comprehensive Out-of-Court "Surrender Settlement" Framework vs. Arm HJim Mullens27 hours ago
199258Jim, talk about confirmation bias. Your question directs AI to confirm your opinSrat Man28 hours ago
199257Depends on what terms Qualcomm is willing to settle. Regarding the litigation ofJGoren118 hours ago
199256Startup Makes Switching AI Chips Easier—and Nvidia Is a New Investor Decart’s vaBill Wolf18 hours ago
199255I'm fine with subdued so long as they had a chance to buyback well below whaWildbiftek-8 hours ago
199254Srat Man, re: CA on big stage-..................................................Jim Mullens511 AM
199253Copilot Q&A re: The Reuters ARM antitrust article...........................Jim Mullens310 AM
199252CA is acting like a rank amateur on the big stage. This hide the ball....tune inSrat Man69 AM
199251Samsung Electronics Co. and its largest labor union are locked in talks to avertBill Wolf-8 AM
199250When you want out you need to create liquidity.freefromwires28 AM
199249ARM initiated at Bernstein as "outperform", $300 PT. (Did Stacy RasgonJeffreyHF-8 AM
199248Jukan specialises in semis for Citrini Research which is well known; Team memberFtseNASDAQ-1 AM
199247Do you see any avenue for Arm to exit the situation as it sits?Cooters-yesterday
199246No search can find any rumors that you are talking about. The only "rumor&qRKnight1yesterday
199245For those seeking input from AI, here is a cautionary note: knowledge.wharton.upJGoren-yesterday
199244Amon said on his interview with Bloomberg I think that the one he was referring FtseNASDAQ4yesterday
199243The Chinese leak everything, this is very likely true. I hope this is not the hyQCOM_HYPE_TRAIN-yesterday
199242Read the Jukan thread. AR/VR is not what is being alluded to IMOFtseNASDAQ-yesterday
199241share.googlewaitwatchwander-yesterday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):