SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
189143 1013 8 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
189143AI is increasing 5G traffic. Signs point toward 6G as the answer By Julia King Bill Wolf-38 minutes ago
189142Off Topic: Aswath Damodaran The Power of Expectations: Nvidia's Earnings RBill Wolf13 hours ago
189141Interesting takeaway from folks at Six5. Qualcomm's move to 8 Core opens upThriftyfive124 hours ago
189140www, Jeff, re: Copilot on AAPL modems ..........................................Jim Mullens14 hours ago
189139I venture to guess, with TSMC raising prices Timmy needs to pull a page out of hThriftyfive114 hours ago
189138Yep just entered the question (reworded slightly by CP in the opening line of thJeff Vayda-4 hours ago
189137What did it take for you to get that summary out of CoPilot? Did it all come orwaitwatchwander15 hours ago
189136Quick CoPilot summary...Apple modem "The claim that Apple would replace QuJeff Vayda95 hours ago
189135Off Topic: Get Ready for the New Nuclear Age. It Could Help Solve America’s EleBill Wolf-5 hours ago
189134prototype / Apple's first phone with their own chip : m.media-amazon.comJon Koplik13yesterday
189133The SE will come first as issues there won't be canaballistic. Until we seewaitwatchwander3yesterday
189132If I had a dollar for every errant "scoop" from Kuo on Apple imminentlDWB4yesterday
189131ParkerVision v. Qualcomm Sent Back to Florida for Trial After Appellate Court Ovwaitwatchwander2yesterday
189130Yes!BDAZZ1yesterday
189129Stay tuned for November'—Qualcomm CEO teases high-performance desktop CPUs, Bill Wolf3yesterday
189128It would be less expensive for us investors if Qualcomm were to write Apple thatJeffreyHF20yesterday
189127ParkerVision wins appeal at the CAFC - case remanded to Jacksonville. Can'tDoug M.-yesterday
189126MANY things have "been said."Jon Koplik6yesterday
189125"it has been said"Jon Koplik4yesterday
189124I thought that Q had largely discounted any possible Apple modem business post &garrettjax3yesterday
189123Apple could completely ditch Qualcomm's 5G modems by 2027 William GallagherSGR8FORM1yesterday
189122(Hyperbole to vent) If the market has to shed 10% of its fat, why does that tranBDAZZ1yesterday
189121…My latest supply chain survey indicates that Apple's in-house 5G chip shipmGR8FORM1yesterday
189120Another Apple modem rumor from Ming-Chi Kuo making the rounds today. He claims AJeffreyHF7yesterday
189119Billy's team is back in the dumps the last few years: Oakland Athleticcs ReDoug M.-yesterday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):