We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
169093 950 6 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.


First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.


Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
169093<i>Highly regarded by both industry peers and his staff, the 58-year-old wTHE WATSONYOUTH-yesterday
169092I’ve had several Toyota’s, the last being 2017 Highlander Limited and the telemamanning18-yesterday
169091Yes, what's here today isn't necessarily what coming tomorrow. How Toyowaitwatchwander-yesterday
169090It looks like Qualcomm Snapdragon Cockpit is acceptable to a lot more of the priarun gera6yesterday
169089<Qualcomm and Toyota haven't had a lot of business dealings> Toyota sarun gera1yesterday
169088Maurice, this one's for you- the real meaning of exorbitant-----------------Jim Mullens7yesterday
169087Two things. Intel passing all their wireless IP to Apple facilitated Intel collwaitwatchwander2yesterday
169086<I simply don't understand enough to know whether Renovo poses a competitarun gera12yesterday
169085I'm not posting this to defend Qualcomm or slam Intel, but rather to discussWildbiftek7yesterday
169084Renovo's paternity comes out of Intel, Cisco, Nokia, Stanford, and other tecJeffreyHF1yesterday
169083<Isn't the Renovo team complimentary to, rather than a replacement for, Sarun gera-yesterday
169082Renovo Auto is/was a small sop, with online sources claiming a total of only 38-JeffreyHF-yesterday
169081<New Operating System for Cars> I thought Renovo was making that. Toyota arun gera-Saturday New Operating System for Carsvoop-Saturday
169079Doug, with the escalating rhetoric and fly-bys between China and the Taiwan, andJeffreyHF9Saturday
169078those chips in R PI are generic CPU chips and NOT applicable for smartphone workengineer1last Friday
169077Meanwhile the "lowly" Intel that what outmaneuvered in the mobile chipDoug M.4last Friday
169076Here's a good one - according to Charlie Munger, Wells Fargo's CEO (RichDoug M.1last Friday
169075If Intel can become a competent and reliable fab, for some of QCT's needs, tJeffreyHF5last Friday
169074<its artificially high margins from prior years were due to its refusal to liarun gera-last Friday
169073A CEO does not a company make. Intel has no guarantee of succeeding in its increWildbiftek2last Friday
169072I hope the company begins to show a little Nuvia leg, at Investor's Day, andJeffreyHF4last Friday
169071<Automakers may also be looking at this situation as an opportunity to modernarun gera2last Friday
169070<<I found this interesting - he's not your average CEO: <<“AndyDoug M.2last Friday
169069Speaking of Buffet, I'm not upset that my Intel stock is down today. If thiDoug M.2last Friday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):