SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
167856 944 6 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
167856If Google is successful in designing its own processors, it will still have to pArt Bechhoefer-19 minutes ago
167855<i>What is Google Thinking?</i> ....seems like a tough road........THE WATSONYOUTH-20 minutes ago
167854What is Google Thinking? marketwatch.comjazzcat2000-32 minutes ago
167853bought 1K of Xilinx...............depending on Lisa to pull off merger....we wilTHE WATSONYOUTH-44 minutes ago
167852<i>Otoh, is that strategic vision?</i> ........I guess the market tTHE WATSONYOUTH-50 minutes ago
167851<i>Google Is Making Its Own Smartphone Chips. What It Means for Qualcomm STHE WATSONYOUTH-58 minutes ago
167850Google Is Making Its Own Smartphone Chips. What It Means for Qualcomm Stock. ByBill Wolf4an hour ago
167849Beijing Shuns Ericsson, Nokia as the West Curbs Huawei The U.S. has effectively Bill Wolf-an hour ago
167848U.K. Considers Blocking Nvidia Takeover of Arm Over Security (Bloomberg) -- TheBill Wolf-an hour ago
167847Their gain; our loss. Hfhedgefund-3 hours ago
167846Agree 100%Silcon Observer-yesterday
167845You’re 100% correct, they did know this already. The issue is that Qualcomm stocStock_Master11yesterday
167844........yes...............very impressive..................congratulations......THE WATSONYOUTH-yesterday
167843Why hasn’t Q hired JeffreyHF as its Public Information Officer (PIO?) or CIO orjazzcat200014yesterday
167842Believe Google would have done enough study to take an educated call on how muchvkvraju59yesterday
167841It's hard to imagine them not using a QCT modem, in a phone they're inteJeffreyHF5yesterday
167840<<And that’s the problem Google really needs to solve: getting people to bDoug M.2yesterday
167839Obviously, QCT was well aware of this development for a long time, yet touted AnJeffreyHF3yesterday
167838Pixel 6 with Tensor SoC: theverge.com Midday drop in share prices likely headlWildbiftek6yesterday
167837SIMO was a great stock from 2010 to 2016, then an up to $52 and down to $38 overElroy1yesterday
167836Elroy, you've been a booster of SIMO for a long time around here, and this iJeffreyHF1yesterday
167835<i>.....AMD will increase yearly revenue over 60% this year......original Elroy-yesterday
167834.....AMD will increase yearly revenue over 60% this year......original outlook wTHE WATSONYOUTH-yesterday
167833BKAV exposed the vulnerability of Face ID. Imagine what they'll be able to dJeffreyHF1Sunday
167832Here's the first AI 1000 edge server deployment I've come across. Itwaitwatchwander5Sunday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):