SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
162599 924 6 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
162599China retaliation for USA attack on Huawei. Qualcomm is trivial by comparison wiMaurice Winn-yesterday
162598About $400 million down the drain. $3.5 BN spent, 15% shareholding for QCOM Maurice Winn-yesterday
162597Assets on the auction block. More Qualcomm money down the drain. It had previoMaurice Winn-yesterday
162596---> Huawei Retaliation I'd take it that serious action here will awaitwaitwatchwander-yesterday
162595Huawei Warns U.S. of Retaliation by Beijing; Profit Growth Slows Chairman says Bill Wolf-yesterday
162594As of last March, OneWeb had raised $3.4B so I guess Qualcomm is in for at most waitwatchwander-yesterday
162593Bill, didn't QCOM just recently notify us of a $.03, increase to .65? WeirdPaul V.1yesterday
162592These 60 large U.S. companies are ‘susceptible to a dividend cut,’ according to Bill Wolf1yesterday
162591Xiaomi Expects Chinese Smartphone Recovery After Profit Beat Bloomberg News MarcBill Wolf-yesterday
162590Any idea what a 15% holding in OneWeb translates into on the QSI write-off frontwaitwatchwander-yesterday
162589And like G*, seems Q was willing to help seed the field but not willing to mortgJeff Vayda2yesterday
162588I missed this. Is this now G* 2.0? [tweet]waitwatchwander2yesterday
162587A week is a long time in politics and chip sales. 2 years is life and death twiMaurice Winn8Monday
162586[tweet]DanD4Monday
162585OT COVID The 2nd wave in China has started and is now bouncing. The aftermathwaitwatchwander3Monday
162584Hi engineer, Jim, what many of these articles (the one on iPhones, the other onerecycled_electron6Monday
162583Citi reiterates buy rating but cuts price target to $98 from $108. I don't Doug M.-Monday
162582(repeating) fake news : Intel engineers hopelessly befuddled by fold this flap oJon Koplik-Monday
162581all the more of Intel falling farther behind. You don't just take 40 years oengineer6Monday
162580but that is NOT what the article says. Read it again. He is comparing the old 5engineer-Monday
162579Intels new fabs have halted construction, presumably due to virus. Whatever....rdvdw©-Sunday
162578Qualcomm’s Tiered SOC Diversification Pays Off, Expands Footprint futurumresearJim Mullens7Sunday
162577engineer, article in WSJ. including the Semiconductor stocks: AMAT, QCOM and othPaul V.-Sunday
162576Engineer, re: WSJ / QCOM 5G component pricing I really think this is a hit pieJim Mullens2last Saturday
162575I find your response interesting. However, INTEL would have had to come up with engineer7last Saturday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):