SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
192770 1022 8 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
192770With Trump’s Help, Intel Could Hand Control of Chip Plants to TSMC The Silicon Bill Wolf-17 minutes ago
192769Qualcomm seeks to squeeze money out of Apple as the SE 4 is expected to score resbfm457 minutes ago
192768Very Informative: Qualcomm - AI disruption is driving innovation in on-device iGR8FORM7yesterday
192767TSMC Considers Running Intel’s US Factories After Trump Team Request TSMC would Bill Wolf1yesterday
192766Latest INTC rumor: TSM to take controlling interest in INTC following a Trump adsbfm2yesterday
192765Dell Nears $5 Billion AI Server Deal for Elon Musk’s xAIMusk’s AI startup develoBill Wolf1yesterday
192764Meta Plans Major Investment Into AI-Powered Humanoid RobotsCompany is aiming to Bill Wolf-yesterday
192763Apple new line-up to be introduced February 19.sbfm3yesterday
192762The most pathetic thing here is that everyone in mainstream media, and their uncThriftyfive3yesterday
192761The most pathetic thing here is that everyone in mainstream media, and their uncThriftyfive16yesterday
192760Is there any business Q could hope to do with NVIDIA?sbfm-yesterday
192759NVDA just disclosed that it has decreased its holdings of ARM stock, from 1.96 mJeffreyHF11yesterday
192758 Arm launches its own chip by Nick FarrBill Wolf2yesterday
192757"Unclean Hands"Silcon Observer3yesterday
192756ARM engineer, about to enter clean room : bangshift.comJon Koplik6yesterday
192755Q dropped and the Judge dismissed with prejudice. Silicon Investor (SI) -- The QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN6yesterday
192754So I remembered right that Q dropped with prejudice its claim against ARM for miQurious-Thursday
192753Exclusive: Arm recruits from customers as it plans to sell its own chips | ReuteSilcon Observer9Thursday
192752If this news is confirmed when the time comes to decide on the undecided Q1 of ASilcon Observer8Thursday
192751I guess what Haas testified were musings, were much more concrete and developed JeffreyHF8Thursday
192750well... that seems like a clear concise and reasonable assessment....Optntrdr19991Thursday
192749That aspect was dropped with prejudice, but this perfectly goes into the QualcomQCOM_HYPE_TRAIN12Thursday
192748There is a 2nd counter suit which was brought on by Qualcomm covering this issuewaitwatchwander2Thursday
192747I am sure the counter suit being heard next year is going to be a problem for AROptntrdr19997Thursday
192746Did Q not drop that claim in the on-going suit? Or am I mistaken?Qurious1Thursday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):