We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
163730 930 6 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.


First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.


Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
163730ABI research- Recent 5G Smartphone Teardowns Show That RF Front End Content AndJim Mullens-7 minutes ago
163729Curious, re: walter Piecyk 2.0- (Doubling Down On Qualcomm) As a point of reJim Mullens-41 minutes ago
163728Thanks vkvraju5 and N.Novic, Yes that is the conventional wisdom and I was thiSilcon Observer243 minutes ago
163727Art, there was no jury in the Koh case, because equitable remedies were sought, JeffreyHF-an hour ago
163726The case appears to have implications for FTC v. QCOM, but I'm not sure whatArt Bechhoefer1an hour ago
163725 Fed. Circ. Furthers Jury's Say Over Standard Essential Patents lml62 hours ago
163724Samsung's 5nm troubles have reportedly cost it Qualcomm's business for tBill Wolf37 hours ago
163723Applied Information will bring Cellular Vehicle to Everything (C-V2X) technologyBill Wolf27 hours ago
163722A Taiwan Tech Company Bigger Than Foxconn (Not TSMC) Tim Culpan,Bloomberg•AugustBill Wolf-8 hours ago
163721need numbers to locate recording transcripts cafc.uscourts.govDa Rookie112 AM
163720It is possible that Huawei is looking to buy Snapdragon chips from Qualcomm and vkvraju510yesterday
163719perhaps to clear a path for chips sales in 3-6 months when their inventory of 7nN.Novick-yesterday
163718Guys... What are your thoughts on why Huawei settled with Qualcomm now, after 3Silcon Observer-yesterday
163717Oh no. Walter Piecyk 2.0?Qurious2yesterday
163716That's a fair point and it puts fabless x86, PowerPC and RISC-V designers inWildbiftek-yesterday
163715Samsung reported facing delays in 5nm production: Qualcomm Wildbiftek2yesterday
163714Doubling Down On Qualcomm (hold on to your socks---$250 5 year trgt) SnipJim Mullens10yesterday
163713I got a bulletin from Law360 this morning, that had only this cryptic informatioJeffreyHF-yesterday
163712I am not sure that TSMC is a good partner for this. right now they are a PURE PLengineer3yesterday
163711JeffreyHF this is interesting. Is there a link for this to read up on the detialSilcon Observer1yesterday
163710will feel better when a TSMC plant in Arizona is up and runningN.Novick1yesterday
163709It would most likely be a swap with Intel and could happen in 3-5 years once Q hN.Novick-yesterday
163708Dow Components---QCOM ? Just curious, anyone think QCOM is a possible candidate jazzcat2000-yesterday
163707Looks like Softbank will keep their stake in ARM and nVidia may just be making aWildbiftek1yesterday
163706Anyway, let's do Qualcomm's price to sales while I'm at it: AssuminDoug M.1yesterday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):