We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  For example, here is how to disable FireFox ad content blocking while on Silicon Investor.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
156490 909 5 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.


First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.


Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
156490Worthy of a full posting: Qualcomm's Shares Surge 31% As Analyst Sets a $1,Bill Wolf23 hours ago
156489One key unknown metric we must have to develop a decent price prediction is floasbfm13 hours ago
156488Re : Q share price could hit $125 later this year -- well, since you used BarronJon Koplik23 hours ago
156487QCOM All time high....almost there...................... When calculating theJim Mullens34 hours ago
156486"2022 or so would be my guess" That strikes me as a very conservativematherandlowell34 hours ago
156485Peter, Speaking of Walter in the context of Qualcomm's recent good news: .ryhack-4 hours ago
156484In the end, Apple-Qualcomm settlement came down to 5G [graphic] “Qualcomm has bIceHawk24 hours ago
156483Are there still people out there who are short QCOM? [graphic]Investor2-5 hours ago
156482Walter is still around as a tech analyst. Your are correct that 125 will be the Peter Sherman25 hours ago
156481Back to the future! Qualcomm's Shares Surge 31% As Analyst Sets a $1,000 Takozom-5 hours ago
156480And we should send Walter a toaster.BDAZZ-5 hours ago
156479Does Sammy make a thin modem?Dan R-5 hours ago
1564782022 or so would be my guess. Well after 5G rolls out and we see significant royengineer-5 hours ago
156477Hmm, the Walter Piecyk Cup, the board member who predicts the date Q closes at $hedgefund35 hours ago
156476yes, but if you look at the lifetime high, it was around $87 a share. We never engineer15 hours ago
156475[graphic] The chart speaks for itself...Prophet of Profits-6 hours ago
156474Walt Piecyk announced his $1000 price target in December of 1999. On December ryhack16 hours ago
156473around $ hours ago
156472$125 isn't it?DWB36 hours ago
156471Just curious. Anyone know the split adjusted price equivalent for the infamous $BDAZZ-6 hours ago
156470Thanks, I had misunderstood who held the cash. AshleyA.J. Mullen-7 hours ago
156469since they get that money from Apple, there is little issue with what you postedengineer-7 hours ago
156468(closing basis) Q now at over 19-year high. 01/03/00 was only higher close.Jon Koplik107 hours ago
156467Good point, something that hasn’t been mentioned as a big collateral asset: the BDAZZ148 hours ago
156466Check out Rob Enderle's latest post castigating apple.chiilingInSd48 hours ago
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):