We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  For example, here is how to disable FireFox ad content blocking while on Silicon Investor.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
159881 916 5 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.


First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.


Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
159881Huawei faces a ‘life or death crisis,’ CEO says as he lays out ‘battle’ strategyBill Wolf-14 minutes ago
159880AP Explains: US sanctions on Huawei bite, but who gets hurt? 1:23 PM ET, 08/20/2Bill Wolf-34 minutes ago
159879The Fourth Industrial Revolution Hinges on 5G Technology TUE, APR 3, 2018 - 7:3manning18-an hour ago
159878As we learned with the Apple deals, it's the related side deals that matter waitwatchwander-yesterday
159877Sounds like they are chafing, and the article's author misunderstands what&#Wildbiftek-yesterday
159876Trump Blocks Tech Merger to Stimulate 5G Leadership <snip>"And remembflite-yesterday
159875In my view, it's because Koh wanted to lower Qualcomm's royalty rates byDoug M.-yesterday
159874LG's 5G Smartphones Could Be Delayed, Thanks To Qualcomm June 12, 2019: anDoug M.-yesterday
159873Why would this LG deal be in violation of Koh's very vague order ? Q negotiTroubleT1yesterday
159872Doug, I'm glad that Qualcomm dodged a bullet when Judge Koh didn't inclryhack11yesterday
159871Doug, to me it's more than unbelievably arrogant; it's unlawful, and wonJeffreyHF8yesterday
159870<<5G and non-SEP aren't a part of the FTC lawsuit,>> Too bad thDoug M.14yesterday
159869Odd that LG has not commented? Venture Beats spin... venturebeat-com.cdn.ampproGR8FORM-yesterday
159868The new licensing agreement with LG covers 3G, 4G, and 5G, as well as non-SEP prArt Bechhoefer-yesterday
159867<<Obviously, I would like to have the stay granted but the agreement with Doug M.1yesterday
159866<<Good to see Qualcomm not sitting around waiting for clarity of this mattDoug M.-yesterday
159865 Fortune magazine- Change the World - Qualcomm ranked 1st Qualcomm | Fortabcs2yesterday
159864Mqurice maintains price target at $113.13 despite FTC Koh and co deciding QualcoMaurice Winn-yesterday
159863QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM): A Perfect Mix Of Income And Growth Investment By benhorseman-yesterday
159862"Qualcomm strikes a new Five-Year Patent licensing deal with LG" Doesmatherandlowell1yesterday
159861RE Anti-5G journalism : Anti- Aunti, I cry 'Uncle' themz fighten wurdz. frmrVZguy-yesterday
159860It seems to me Koh's been snookered by her putting forth a ruling lacking spwaitwatchwander-yesterday
159859Qualcomm foolishly discounting both cap and % when the price should be increasinMaurice Winn-yesterday Qualcomm strikes a new Five-Year Patent licensing deal with LG Qubenhorseman-yesterday
159857I understand what you're saying, however her ruling applies specifically to Wildbiftek-yesterday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):