We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  For example, here is how to disable FireFox ad content blocking while on Silicon Investor.
An SI Board Since December 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
238 3 0 RMLL
Emcee:  KOLOS Type:  Unmoderated
Has anyone noticed the volume lately. I would have to think that something is up with this company. They have a joint venture property with Pure Gold in northern Alberta. At $0.04 cents how low can this company go?
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
238 New thread for RMLL check out interesting news release today. Checkout the ERNLVeteran98-8/23/1999
237 Now now - No excuse Buckey-8/12/1999
236 Maybe they forgot, but they are pretty simple forms and the Commissions usuallyShaw-8/12/1999
235 Dean - Maybe this is why she had a noodle up her ass - They likely concocted thBuckey-8/12/1999
234 Wizzer.. most of us here know what this management is capable of.. I don't JAS-8/9/1999
233 I just got in, but word is out they will be changing their name from ReclamatioKOLOS-8/5/1999
232 It has happened - SW must do a post mortem and tighten up the gap that caused tBuckey-8/5/1999
231 Gotta figure it shouldn't be too hard to figure out who sent out that PR. YShaw-8/5/1999
230 That was probalbly the biigest error the scamsters made in their bogus NR - TheBuckey-8/5/1999
229 Hey John, Go back thru the PR's. There is no way this company would be takShaw-8/5/1999
228 wiz - Maybe she just cannot absilutely deny it because she simply cannot get a Buckey-8/5/1999
227 <i>"have led us to believe that there is no substance to the bid &quWizzer-8/5/1999
226 101k now traded on 4 trades and still 5 minutes before open - I searched last nBuckey-8/5/1999
225 KOLOS - some fools already trading this puppy 1.5 hours before open - and at .0Buckey-8/5/1999
224 Frankly I find SH a royal waste of time BUT It sure would have helped today - IBuckey-8/4/1999
223 I don't understand you guys. What was in the original release that was so bKOLOS-8/4/1999
222 they are leaving that 5% chance that it is something - nice guise so far Buckey-8/4/1999
221 "have led us to believe that there is no substance to the bid " anyonJAS-8/4/1999
220 JAS and all. I never thought we were going to go to 1 cent. I didn't even Chris K.-8/4/1999
219 Is that so???? Buckey-8/4/1999
217 I agree.. Tried to get some at .08 but no takers. If this was going to get dumJAS-8/4/1999
216 Not much in SH - I checked all the former directors and particpants and nothingBuckey-8/4/1999
215 I wonder if there is a TYPO - I am just tickled over the clevrness of the NR - Buckey-8/4/1999
214 Does anyone know the company that already owns a lot of RMLL? That Hilps used mJAS-8/4/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):