Silicon Investor - Coronavirus - Covid 19 Information Sharing Forum

[Valuepro] I would think that most of us here look at that as a stupid question. Either tha...

Valuepro — 4/2/2026 8:39:39 PM

I would think that most of us here look at that as a stupid question. Either that, or Conor is underinformed and seeking an education.

[Thomas M.] [graphic] Tom

Thomas M. — 4/2/2026 8:06:44 PM

Tom

[golfer72] I've pretty much given up trying to talk to folks about the fake vaccine. Back i...

golfer72 — 3/27/2026 5:55:47 AM

I've pretty much given up trying to talk to folks about the fake vaccine. Back in April 2021 a friend tried to shame me into taking the va66ine by using the " you dont want to help society?" nonsense. I told him I have info on the shot that I could send him he said "no thanks I know enough". I never brought it up again. Smart guy but he also thinks masks work. Also Trump and his "beautiful vaccine that saved millions of lives" doesn't help.

[The Barracuda™] Nope, but the pro covid shot hysterics are gone and no one is getting the shot. ...

The Barracuda™ — 3/23/2026 7:48:33 AM

Nope, but the pro covid shot hysterics are gone and no one is getting the shot. There's "No, omg—you were right, Barracuda™. We should’ve listened"

[The Barracuda™] Tried to warn them but they wouldn't listen [X] It didn’t take an AI to figur...

The Barracuda™ — 3/23/2026 6:43:09 AM

Tried to warn them but they wouldn't listen

[X]

It didn’t take an AI to figure out this kindergarten pattern recognition. We saw it. It is happening. Why do gene therapies take 10+ years to bring to market? The adverse signals show up early, then late. We are entering the complex, compounding window of harms now. https://t.co/1qQFpiUhdY
— Ryan Cole MD (@DoctorCole) March 23, 2026

[/X]

[Valuepro] Related. Lyme. COVID. Survival. And the memoir that followed. lymedisease.org

Valuepro — 2/28/2026 2:40:30 PM

[Valuepro] "Has anyone had any success opening minds on covid? If so, what worked?" No! ...

Valuepro — 2/28/2026 1:07:02 PM

"Has anyone had any success opening minds on covid? If so, what worked?"

No! I've found such health issues to be akin to religious zealotry in that doctors are gods to the majority of people. And, I think, the majority of people are lazy and don't want to be troubled with looking for other opinions.

For instance, I have chronic Lyme disease along with three other chronic co-infections (also called, "Lyme Complex"). Lyme disease, among some properly educated people in the health industry, is know as the "great imitator," because it can mimic symptoms of many other diseases. That leads to inappropriate treatment, or dismissal as a hypochondriac . I've found that if you inform someone who has been diagnosed with one of the associated diseases - MS, AD, Parkinson's, and many more - that they may really have Lyme Complex disease, they look back at me bewildered. When I add that they should take it up with their doctor, or at least be tested for it, they don't want to hear anything further.

However, some people who remain ill after visiting numerous doctors without receiving a diagnosis, or for whom treatments don't work, can get desperate enough to be accepting of alternative opinions.

By the way, I was a co-founder and chair (for 14 years) of a Lyme disease support group with three real time meeting locations in my state, and about 450 people on our mailing list. Our members included numbers health professionals too ill to work, or their family members - even children who were born with it from infected mothers.

VP

By the way, Lyme disease or Lyme Complex is a political disease, as the diagnosis is shunned by the insurance industry and by doctors who refuse to prescribe extended treatments using antibiotics. That is outside of treatment "guidelines" in many states and doctors have been prosecuted for doing so. That's amazing to me, because I never understood that "guidelines" could be interpreted as "laws." But that's how the health business operates today, under the influence of insurers, and other vested interests.

[jpdunwell] Has anyone had any success opening minds on covid? If so, what worked? I can't s...

jpdunwell — 2/28/2026 8:33:30 AM

Has anyone had any success opening minds on covid? If so, what worked?

I can't say it was a direct result of anything I said or did, but I think it was a combination of the information I had provided earlier in cautioning them, and then first- or second-hand experience akin to what your brother experienced. I had 2 friends I had cautioned to research the vaccines before taking them. One of them was a contractor for the Army (having retired earlier from the Army), and was the lead auditor for his team. After his third shot, he said immediately he just couldn't think anymore, and was so incapacitated that he had to retire. He said he could not even remember the simplest things anymore, and attributed it directly to the vaccine. The other took the Covid vaccine and on his way home, he passed out going from his truck to his house, and had a serious back injury. He swore off the vaccine from there on. I've also had a few work colleagues who've sworn off the vaccines after seeing a couple other of our work colleagues with vaccine injuries (one a young healthy runner with a serious heart injury just after the vaccine, and another who like my Army friend had to retire prematurely after his 2nd vaccine shot).

But in general, I think you're right, that there's not much you can do to convince people, and they really have to either want to learn for themselves, or have a first- or close second-hand experience that convinces them. It's like AJ often says "Science says that when someone is presented with evidence that contradicts their beliefs, they double down on those beliefs". While I think that Science really would say that the evidence should be followed to its logical conclusion, psychology and human nature win out and the end result is the doubling down. This is what I found so ironic about the unscientific crowd adopting the "Follow the Science" mantra, as they did anything but that.

But I do think the realization is setting in on the general populace through their own experiences, and this is evidenced by the rapidly waning uptake of the vaccines, among other markers. So even though people are loathe to state it openly and generally will not react well to direct confrontation on the subject, their actions and growing skepticism tell the story.

It's apparent that these vaccines have unleashed a multitude of wide-ranging health issues on the public now that are going to take many years to be discovered and admitted. The largest human experiment in history failed spectacularly, and will not be easily admitted. Meanwhile, the longer it takes to admit, the more damage that is done to those already afflicted, and those yet to be.

[ItsAllCyclical] Very good video. Saw snippets prior. Covid and how it was handled woke a nu...

ItsAllCyclical — 2/26/2026 11:47:41 AM

Very good video. Saw snippets prior. Covid and how it was handled woke a number of people up to the corruption and planning of the pedo elites and their handlers. Then you had the massive corruption that DOGE found via NGOs. You have DataRepublican and others exposing massive frauds on X on a regular basis. Then you have the release of the Epstein files.

Despite all of this you still essentially have the majority of Dems (say 85%+) not willing to listen to anything outside of their own silos. 15 sources, but they all have the same bias/missing stories. You can't be cynical enough in this environment.

There are a lot of things being handled poorly. I get the anger on both sides, but the questions presented here are far, far more existential to what comes next out of our eventual financial reset (and maybe New World Order) if we don't wake up soon.

I'm still amazed at how many people are completely asleep here. My brother who was likely damaged by the clot shot is a constant reminder. He was closed minded before and scoffed at anything that didn't fit the official "gov/dem" narrative. Now that he's lost 25% of his brain he's worse.

He may still be being harmed by this gene delivery system, but there's no way he'll ever examine or consider that possibility.

I would like to send him this video but it wouldn't matter. Like most dems he'd just look to attack the source vs their arguments. And secondly he'd have a very hard time considering their arguments in any sort of reasonable manner. Absorbing new ideas is difficult enough, considering multiple arguments/conflicting vantage points is near impossible.

So while I like the video I don't think I could change a single family/friend with this to even consider the possibility of something more nefarious than the offical propaganda the Dems spew on Covid, the aftermath and the dangers of the overall mRNA platform (self-replicating as well now).

Has anyone had any success opening minds on covid? If so, what worked?

[The Barracuda™] Interesting chat [youtube video]

The Barracuda™ — 2/26/2026 10:11:17 AM

[The Barracuda™] Oh well..... [X] 🚨HUNDREDS of studies now indicate COVID-19 “vaccines” are on...

The Barracuda™ — 1/18/2026 11:28:08 AM

Oh well.....

[X]

🚨HUNDREDS of studies now indicate COVID-19 “vaccines” are one of the LARGEST carcinogenic exposures in modern history.

They:

1. Increase your risk of 7 major cancers
2. Disrupt THOUSANDS of critical genes
3. Integrate into human genomes
4. Drive genome instability
5. Enable… https://t.co/rDJN8Lkly9 pic.twitter.com/N4XR4l8kpm
— Nicolas Hulscher, MPH (@NicHulscher) January 17, 2026

[/X]

[The Barracuda™] Not one of us when it counted but eventually he was [graphic]

The Barracuda™ — 1/13/2026 6:55:41 PM

Not one of us when it counted but eventually he was

[The Barracuda™] Scott Adams has passed; we tried. ..... [youtube video]

The Barracuda™ — 1/13/2026 3:55:02 PM

[maceng2] Shocking study linking Covid jabs and cancer 'censored' by mysterious cyberattac...

maceng2 — 1/9/2026 6:11:41 PM

Shocking study linking Covid jabs and cancer 'censored' by mysterious cyberattack

covid report hacked.

global review examining reported cases of cancer following Covid vaccination was published earlier this month, just as the medical journal hosting it was hit by a cyberattack that has since taken the site offline.

The study appeared in the peer-reviewed journal Oncotarget on January 3 and was authored by cancer researchers from Tufts University in Boston and Brown University in Rhode Island.

In the review, researchers analyzed 69 previously published studies and case reports from around the world, identifying 333 instances in which cancer was newly diagnosed or rapidly worsened within a few weeks following Covid vaccination.

The review covered studies from 2020 to 2025 and included reports from 27 countries, including the US, Japan, China, Italy, Spain, and South Korea. No single country dominated, suggesting the observed patterns were reported globally.

The authors emphasized that the review highlights patterns observed in existing reports, but does not establish a direct causal link between vaccination and cancer.

Days after publication, Oncotarget's website became inaccessible, displaying a 'bad gateway' error that the journal attributed to an ongoing cyberattack.

The journal reported the incident to the FBI, noting disruptions to its online operations.

In social media posts, one of the paper's authors, Dr Wafik El-Deiry of Brown University, expressed concern that the attack disrupted access to newly published research.

'Censorship is alive and well in the US, and it has come into medicine in a big, awful way,' El-Deiry wrote in a post on X.

A new medical review has uncovered cancerous growths forming just days and weeks after individuals received the Covid-19 vaccine

The new study was published by the journal Oncotarget, which has been attacked by hackers, preventing readers from accessing the research

The FBI told Daily Mail that it 'neither confirms nor denies the existence of any specific investigation' into a cyberattack on Oncotarget.

The Daily Mail has reached out to Oncotarget for comment on the cyberattack investigation.

In a post that can no longer be accessed because of the website hacking, Oncotarget noted disruptions to the availability of new studies online. Although they did not accuse a specific group of wrongdoing, the journal alleged without evidence that the hackers may be connected to the anonymous research review group PubPeer.

The researchers alleged that the cyberattack targeted Oncotarget's servers to disrupt the journal's operations and prevent new papers from being properly added to the site's index.

The message was shared on social media by El-Deiry before the website crashed, with the doctor adding, 'Censorship of the scientific press is keeping important published information about Covid infection, Covid vaccines and cancer signals from reaching the scientific community and beyond.'

In a statement to the Daily Mail, PubPeer declared: 'No officer, employee or volunteer at PubPeer has any involvement whatsoever with whatever is going on at that journal.'

PubPeer is an online platform where researchers can anonymously comment on peer-reviewed scientific papers after they've already appeared in journals.

Its stated goal has been post-publication peer review, meaning people discuss, critique, or point out potential issues in studies that have already passed the usual pre-publication checks.

Many of the cases involved tumors growing near the injection sites in the arm (Pictured), but the study could not definitively say the Covid vaccine caused cancer

Study author Wafik El-Deiry claimed his work was being 'censored' and shared a post from the study journal alleging the attack was carried out by fact-checkers of published studies

The cyberattack appeared to hit around December 2025, as the site began glitching and slowing down, but shortly after the paper was published, it went offline.

Hackers can shut down websites using methods such as a DDoS attack, which floods the victim's server with fake traffic to overwhelm it and make it crash, or by directly hacking into their systems to block access, often done remotely through weak points in the site's internet security.

[The Barracuda™] DoS attack [X] This scientific journal website dared post a credible paper lin...

The Barracuda™ — 1/9/2026 10:52:00 AM

DoS attack

[X]

This scientific journal website dared post a credible paper linking Covid shots with increased cancers. It is the first peer-reviewed journal to dare to do this. It was hit with a barrage of DDOS attacks and now the whole domain is down. https://t.co/FsWzroPJYf
— Jeffrey A Tucker (@jeffreytucker) January 8, 2026

[/X]

[The Barracuda™] Oh well..... [X] A recent Italian study found that people who received at leas...

The Barracuda™ — 1/7/2026 11:50:40 PM

Oh well.....

[X]

A recent Italian study found that people who received at least one dose of the Covid injection are 34% more likely to develop colorectal cancer, 54% more likely to develop breast cancer, and 62% more likely to develop bladder cancer than the unvaccinated. pic.twitter.com/iJ0q0cSYhT
— Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) January 7, 2026

[/X]

[golfer72] Masking was pushed for a few reasons none of which are medical related. One is ...

golfer72 — 12/15/2025 2:38:03 PM

Masking was pushed for a few reasons none of which are medical related. One is it an obvious sign of compliance like you alluded to . Another is it keeps the "pandemic" front and center in everyone's mind. A third is it reduces interaction and conversations between folks where maybe people might figure out the scam?

[golfer72] I just shake my head when i see them now. Some dope comes into my gym and works ...

golfer72 — 12/15/2025 2:34:59 PM

I just shake my head when i see them now. Some dope comes into my gym and works out with a face diaper on. Just totally clueless

[w0z] I'm thinking wtf are all these people wearing masks LOL? It's either an IQ or W...

w0z — 12/15/2025 8:12:57 AM

I'm thinking wtf are all these people wearing masks LOL?

It's either an IQ or Woke compliance test...or both.

[golfer72] I remember going in the supermarket back in late March 2020. I'm thinking wtf ar...

golfer72 — 12/15/2025 7:37:07 AM

I remember going in the supermarket back in late March 2020. I'm thinking wtf are all these people wearing masks LOL? Little did I know that was all part of the psyop. You still see dopes walking around masked. Its pathetic.

[golfer72] I dont see it as a mistake. They had to block effective treatments so they could...

golfer72 — 12/15/2025 7:33:49 AM

I dont see it as a mistake. They had to block effective treatments so they could get EUA for the shots. Thats what this was all about. It may be the largest crime in history. And the larger the crime the easier it is to get away with it. Too many people, institutions, govt etc are complicit. They are getting away with it

[w0z] That tells you all you need to know. Preposterous mistake! And how many PhDs, ...

w0z — 12/15/2025 6:09:49 AM

That tells you all you need to know.

Preposterous mistake! And how many PhDs, MDs, etc are employed by our government agencies? It almost makes one wonder if this was intentional to reduce the population of the elderly, and therefore medicare and social security payments.

And liberals wonder why conservatives don't trust our government!

[golfer72] The average age of legit death from Covid was like 80/81 years old. It killed ol...

golfer72 — 12/14/2025 9:29:29 PM

The average age of legit death from Covid was like 80/81 years old. It killed old fat people. There was no pandemic. And many of those who died died due to mistreatment and blocking effective therapeutics. In a real pandemic everything would be available to doctors. During "Covid" doctors were told what NOT to do. That tells you all you need to know.

[golfer72] LOL i got banned after like one post which i think was about masks. Very patheti...

golfer72 — 12/14/2025 9:23:09 PM

LOL i got banned after like one post which i think was about masks. Very pathetic folks cant stand open discussion

[maceng2] Reviewing some old posts. I have done multivariate studies, not in medical scien...

maceng2 — 12/14/2025 8:38:28 AM

Reviewing some old posts. I have done multivariate studies, not in medical science though. This is fascinating.

and my study was prompted by this reply.

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic Message Board - Msg: 33238739

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic Message Board - Msg: 33238794

(pre 2020)

and we know so much more now. Some "medical authorities" seem to be asleep at the wheel.

[maceng2] I became "persona non grata" on that thread back in March 2021 -g- Here were my...

maceng2 — 12/14/2025 8:05:30 AM

I became "persona non grata" on that thread back in March 2021 -g-

Here were my final posts

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic Message Board - Msg: 33240757

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic Message Board - Msg: 33241109

and parting shot.

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic Message Board - Msg: 33241104

With the correct Scientific training, unravelling the Covid BS was as easy as pie. Even before the "health authorities" came up with the bare faced lies.

I was being truthful, I always like to engage the other side of the debate, it's the easiest way to spot what one is missing if one looks at things with an open mind. However, I have not found the need to look at that thread much since 2021. They are barking up the wrong tree far as I can tell. I am not a doctor or anything like that.

I can use Statistics though.

I didn't even get banned from the thread. One my very rare diplomatic triumphs. Normally I get whacked off threads fairly early on without realizing I had offended sensitive feelings.

[golfer72] You should post this on the other Covid thread where the Covidiots hang out led ...

golfer72 — 12/13/2025 6:52:05 PM

You should post this on the other Covid thread where the Covidiots hang out led by dopey Sam and Ron

[The Barracuda™] Not good, the covid shot probably cause IMO [X] 🚨NEW: @ScottAdamsSays gives m...

The Barracuda™ — 12/13/2025 1:47:59 PM

Not good, the covid shot probably cause IMO

[X]

🚨NEW: @ScottAdamsSays gives medical update from hospital🙏

"I am paralyzed below the waist in the sense that I can't move any muscles."

"And the solution as of today is we're going to ambulance me over to a facility to get radiated."

"I’ve got all the help I need at Kaiser —… pic.twitter.com/WeQj6Zy9Ez
— Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 (@JasonJournoDC) December 13, 2025

[/X]

[maceng2] MSM news items. (11 Dec 2025) Scientists discover how Covid shots cause deadly...

maceng2 — 12/11/2025 9:05:25 PM

MSM news items.

(11 Dec 2025)
Scientists discover how Covid shots cause deadly heart damage... as officials launch probe into vaccine-linked deaths | Daily Mail Online

(26 Feb 2025)
Yale scientists link Covid vaccines to alarming new syndrome causing 'distinct biological changes' to body | Daily Mail Online

[Valuepro] Yep. You only have to look at the source to appreciate what they are selling.

Valuepro — 12/11/2025 10:46:51 AM

[Thomas M.] Yes, Some Children May Have Died From COVID Shots Denial only serves the aims o...

Thomas M. — 12/11/2025 9:34:25 AM

Yes, Some Children May Have Died From COVID Shots

Denial only serves the aims of anti-vaxxers.

By Benjamin Mazer

theatlantic.com

Note the framing: Science still takes back seat to the agenda of promoting vaccines.

Tom

[golfer72] Doctors are baffled

golfer72 — 12/6/2025 6:03:29 AM

[The Barracuda™] Sen Ron Johnson [youtube video]

The Barracuda™ — 12/4/2025 7:45:52 PM

[The Barracuda™] Oh well..... [X] If only we could discover what has caused the worldwide surge...

The Barracuda™ — 12/4/2025 7:25:43 PM

Oh well.....

[X]

If only we could discover what has caused the worldwide surge in cancers since the Covid 19 vaccine roll out ? Ideas in the comments please. https://t.co/xVpWf1lqdM
— Andrew Bridgen (@ABridgen) December 4, 2025

[/X]

[maceng2] Government ‘withholding data that may link Covid jab to excess deaths’ UKHSA arg...

maceng2 — 11/18/2025 3:12:35 AM

Government ‘withholding data that may link Covid jab to excess deaths’ UKHSA argued that releasing figures would lead to ‘distress or anger’ of bereaved relatives if connection were discovered

UK daily telegraph

UK Government Wins 2-Year Battle to Withhold Data Linking COVID Vaccines to Excess Deaths • Children's Health Defense

(2) Facebook

[golfer72] Working as planned. Keep the population sick and dependent on Big Harma. Hey don...

golfer72 — 11/13/2025 7:04:24 AM

Working as planned. Keep the population sick and dependent on Big Harma. Hey dont we have other vaccines for some of the problems the Covid shot amplifies LOL ?

[Investor2] [youtube video]

Investor2 — 11/12/2025 11:14:28 PM

[Valuepro] 51 Million-Person Study Finds COVID-19 “Vaccines” Increase Risk of Respiratory I...

Valuepro — 11/12/2025 9:34:12 AM

51 Million-Person Study Finds COVID-19 “Vaccines” Increase Risk of Respiratory Infections by up to 559%
thefocalpoints.com

[J.B.C.] [X] INJECTING TRUTH INTO THE VACCINE DEBATE with Del Bigtree | Ep 43 | Going Ro...

J.B.C. — 11/8/2025 10:00:23 AM

[X]

INJECTING TRUTH INTO THE VACCINE DEBATE with Del Bigtree | Ep 43 | Going Rogue with Lara Logan

(0:00:00) - Vaccine Controversy
(0:05:05) - Uncovering Deceptions
(0:12:26) - Persecuted Christians
(0:24:38) - Pharma Industry Corruption
(0:36:36) - Scientist's Career on the Line… pic.twitter.com/SVBIAKnEan
— Lara Logan (@laralogan) November 7, 2025

[/X]

[golfer72] CDC "Center for Deception and Control" Unreal. This was just one way the false n...

golfer72 — 11/5/2025 6:40:15 PM

CDC "Center for Deception and Control" Unreal. This was just one way the false narrative of a "pandemic" was advanced.

[ig] "$200,000 just to run remdesivir through somebody's veins [...] Everything is a ...

ig — 11/5/2025 1:44:50 PM

"$200,000 just to run remdesivir through somebody's veins [...] Everything is a scam."

[X]

John Beaudoin:

"The hospitals are highly incentivized to add... certain [Covid] drugs... $200,000 just to run remdesivir through somebody's veins based on a positive COVID test... [and] the CARES Act was written in 2018, two years before COVID... Everything is a scam."

This… pic.twitter.com/X40slz21hA
— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) November 4, 2025

[/X]

Full source video on Rumble.

rumble.com

---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"The hospitals are highly incentivized to add, not just add Covid, but to use a certain treatment protocol, certain drugs. Use this drug, not that drug. Because if you use this drug, we'll get $200,000 for this patient. Yeah, I'm using the right number. $200,000 just to run remdesivir through somebody's veins based on a positive COVID test. Because you can get them into the ICU, you get the bill up to a million dollars.

"And the NCTAP program, New Covid Treatment Add-On Payment Plan under CMS, which is Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. If somebody were to type in their browser right now, NCTAP space CMS, hit enter. The first thing that comes up will be that new Covid treatment add-on payment plan. Scroll to near the bottom and you will see something called Veklury. And that's remdesivir. And there's a 20% adder for the entire hospital bill if you run that drug through somebody's veins. Also baricitinib, same thing.

"And the year that was November 2nd of 2020 for remdesivir. That's when the kidney failure started. We can get into that later. Paxlovid and molnupiravir, those two were incentivized in December of '21. A year later, kidney signal goes up even higher after that.

"The point is, you're absolutely correct. It put to just to write Covid on it. The hospital gets money from the CARES Act. The doctors weren't personally, incentivized. From what I heard, one doctor up in New Hampshire, when I was testifying for a bill that I wrote, for New Hampshire, trying to make a law, he said, well, I don't remember getting any bonus for writing Covid. I was like, yeah, okay. I guess you don't know the system. The system is the hospital administrators lean on the doctors. They coerce them. It's like, you better start writing Covid or your hospital privileges, your ability to use this hospital are going to go down. There's a lot of. So the solicitation from the act to the hospital to make money causes the hospital to coerce the doctors. And now you have a lot of COVID being written.

"The other incentive you mentioned, there's $9,000 to the family that was added later. That was, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez was all happy and went in front of a camera and said, look what I did for you. I got you $9,000 funeral expenses for Covid. So if a family has spent their life savings and they're going broke because their child has cancer and their child dies of cancer, they get nothing. But if a kid or if. If an old guy gets hit by a car and they write Covid on a death record, they get $9,000. So none of it makes any sense.

"So they were incentivized. The pay plan defines the behavior, is what we used to say. These are behavior modification techniques that you learn when you come up with variable compensation plans. If you're putting together a compensation plan for a corporation, this is what we did in business I was in for 30 years. You incentivize certain things on the variable comp.

"A lot of people are just salaried, right? That's fixed compensation. But salespeople, marketing people, and many companies that want to be progressive, they create a variable compensation program and they give you metrics to meet. You hit those numbers, like, if you can vaccinate 95% of the workforce, everybody gets a bonus. Right? Those types of things. So the behavior modifications are within the CARES Act and the NCTAP out of CMS, and none of it was to solve any disease.

"You think about it, how is throwing money at something going to solve anything? Oh, because everybody's out of work and the businesses are shutting down. Yeah, you shut them down. You did that. And the money's. I mean, everybody was happy to get their $600 check. Like, yeah, but it cost me $20,000. I don't care if you give me 600. The whole thing is just nuts when you think about it in context.

"And so the behavior modifications from the acts, which the lobbyists wrote the stuff that gave— The CARES Act was written in 2018, two years before COVID. It was finalized in 2019, and all they did was change a few variables in March of 2020, and they passed it as a law. Why did they write it in 2018 if they didn't know Covid was coming? Everything is a scam."

[maceng2] ZDoggMD was a clot shot promoter right the way through. Zubin Damania - Wikip...

maceng2 — 11/4/2025 2:30:25 PM

ZDoggMD was a clot shot promoter right the way through.

Zubin Damania - Wikipedia

Brett is right. Can't trust either of those guys further then you can throw them.

You just have to read the comments... The audience knew these clowns were fos back in 2022, can't see how anyone would think different today.

example from the comments in above utube video:

<<"Yeah, my trust in public health is basically gone, I don’t trust anything the CDC says and I’m a nurse".>>

Says it all far as I am concerned.

[The Barracuda™] I dunno who the guy on the left is but congrats. All of us were anon during the...

The Barracuda™ — 11/4/2025 12:53:30 AM

I dunno who the guy on the left is but congrats. All of us were anon during the covid shot fiasco; these guys were not and they stood up.

[golfer72] Anyone who takes any "vaccine" anymore needs to have their head examined

golfer72 — 10/26/2025 10:47:01 PM

[Valuepro] BREAKING: 2.23 Million-Person Study Finds Pneumococcal Vaccines Increase Risk of...

Valuepro — 10/25/2025 10:19:39 AM

BREAKING: 2.23 Million-Person Study Finds Pneumococcal Vaccines Increase Risk of Pneumonia and Death
thefocalpoints.com

[The Barracuda™] Yup. [X] Is @DrPaulOffit throwing his friends under the bus as he builds his o...

The Barracuda™ — 10/24/2025 12:30:11 PM

Yup.

[X]

Is @DrPaulOffit throwing his friends under the bus as he builds his own defense? https://t.co/KBeJg9MLSX
— Bret Weinstein (@BretWeinstein) October 24, 2025

[/X]

[J.B.C.] [X] Hospitals murdered COVID patients. The more they killed, the more money the...

J.B.C. — 10/22/2025 8:41:18 AM

[X]

Hospitals murdered COVID patients. The more they killed, the more money they made.

When the hospitals tested for COVID, they got paid more.

When they admitted patients for COVID, they got paid more.

When they put people on Remdesivir, they got paid more.

And when they put… pic.twitter.com/96EMUBL6tO
— Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) October 22, 2025

[/X]

[golfer72] "Where do they send the vaccines, where do they send the ventilators, and where ...

golfer72 — 10/20/2025 7:33:14 AM

"Where do they send the vaccines, where do they send the ventilators, and where do they send the remdesivir?" In other words they decided who they wanted to kill

[maceng2] WHO and European Commission Launch AI System to Monitor Social Media and Online ...

maceng2 — 10/20/2025 3:36:41 AM

WHO and European Commission Launch AI System to Monitor Social Media and Online “Misinformation” in Real Time

WHO Launches AI System to Track Global Online Conversations

The World Health Organization has introduced a major overhaul of its global monitoring network, unveiling an AI-powered platform that tracks online conversations and media activity in real time.

Known as Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources 2.0 (EIOS), the system is being presented as a new step in “pandemic preparedness,” but its reach extends well beyond disease surveillance.

The upgrade is part of a growing merger between health monitoring, digital tracking, and centralized information control.

Developed with the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC), the new version of EIOS is designed to scan the internet for signals of emerging health threats.

According to the WHO, it now automatically analyzes social media posts, websites, and other public sources to detect possible outbreaks.

More: World Health Organization meets to discuss granting of increased surveillance powers under pandemic treaty

While this is described as a tool for early warning, it effectively allows a global health authority to observe the world’s digital conversations under the banner of safety.

The WHO’s EIOS Collaboration page indicates that partners are also exploring projects such as “News Article Credibility Detection” and “Misinformation Classification Systems.”

These initiatives suggest a growing interest in shaping how information is categorized and filtered.

The latter effort appears linked to the JRC’s “Misinfo Classifier,” released in 2020, which the JRC described as an AI program that detects “fake news” by analyzing the tone and intensity of language in articles.

The organization claimed the tool achieved an 80% success rate and stated that “this is comparable to the state of the art right now.”

At the time, the JRC said the classifier was already in use by the European Commission and European Parliament, and that it would soon be shared with professional fact-checking organizations.

The existence of that project highlights how data analysis and information control are being integrated into public health infrastructure.

The WHO reports that EIOS now operates in more than 110 countries and collaborates with over 30 organizations, including national governments and the European Commission. The platform is being offered “free of charge” to eligible users, along with training materials and support.

This approach ties national monitoring systems directly into a WHO-managed network that continuously gathers and processes global data.

The WHO’s concept of “social listening” sheds more light on this strategy. It defines social listening as “the process of listening to and analyzing conversations and narratives” to understand people’s “attitudes, knowledge, beliefs, and intentions.”

In practical terms, this means that the organization is not only collecting data about disease but also analyzing how citizens think and communicate online.

In its October 13 announcement, the WHO described EIOS 2.0 as “more open, more agile and more inclusive.”

However, under that language lies an expanding surveillance framework that uses artificial intelligence to interpret global social behavior.

A system supposedly for improving health security could easily function as a tool for monitoring public opinion and online expression.

This initiative combines artificial intelligence, government cooperation, and social media tracking under the label of global health security. It represents a change from traditional disease control toward the ongoing analysis of public communication, where algorithms determine which discussions appear “relevant” or “misleading.”

This is something that the WHO has been looking at implementing for some time.

For countries choosing to adopt EIOS, dependence on WHO data and analysis may come at the cost of digital independence.

Under the justification of protecting public health, the WHO is establishing an always-on digital network that watches, classifies, and evaluates global discourse, quietly redefining what it means to manage health and information in the same breath.

[ig] Naomi. [X] I knew it. When I nearly died of sepsis after five days without foo...

ig — 10/19/2025 6:24:10 PM

Naomi.

[X]

I knew it. When I nearly died of sepsis after five days without food or water in a hospital, and the procedure to treat it kept bring pushed back, and my nurse checked a computer and advised a ventilator, I assumed there was an AI program with a code for dissidents, running the… https://t.co/p5dNZTQGlW
— Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry. (@naomirwolf) October 19, 2025

[/X]