SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Quarter to Quarter Aggressive Growth Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (605)8/20/2000 3:47:16 AM
From: Jack Hartmann  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 6912
 
B) Life is a BRZE
Rated a BUY

Business
BreeezeCom is a leading developer and manufacturer of wireless access products used worldwide by service providers and private enterprises. Incorporating internally developed core technologies optimized for high-speed data, most products use spread spectrum radio transmission, digital signal processing and wireless packet switching technology. BreezeCom has three product lines: BreezeACCESS for service providers in licensed and unlicensed frequency bands, BreezeNET for wireless campus networks in unlicensed bands and BreezeLINK for point-to-point T1/E1 connectivity.
BreezeCOM has over 300 employees worldwide, over 30% of which are in R&D. BreezeCOM's corporate headquarters are based in Tel-Aviv Israel, and its North and South America Headquarters located in Carlsbad, CA. The company is also present in the UK, France, Canada, Uruguay, Hong Kong, China, Russia and Romania. BreezeCOM has developed an extensive distribution network, which includes over 300 partners and distributors in more than 60 countries worldwide.

Competitors
WAVC, NTRO

News
TEL AVIV, Israel & CARLSBAD, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--July 31, 2000--
- $24.5 Million Revenues, 139% Year-Over-Year Increase
- 57% Sequential Revenue Growth
- $2.6 Million Net Income
BreezeCOM Ltd. (NASDAQ: BRZE), a leading developer and manufacturer of broadband wireless access products, today announced record revenues for the second quarter ended June 30, 2000, its first profitable quarter.
Revenues for the second quarter were $24.5 million, a 139 percent increase over revenues of $10.3 million reported in the second quarter of 1999, and a 57 percent increase over first quarter 2000 revenues of $15.6 million. Net operating income for the second quarter of 2000 was $807,000, compared with an operating loss of $(969,000) in the same period in 1999, and a loss of $(414,000) in the first quarter of 2000. The Company reported net income of $2.6 million, or $0.08 per diluted share, compared with a net loss of $(1.5 million), or $(0.14) per diluted share, in the second quarter of 1999, and a net loss of $(256,000), or $(0.01) per share, for the first quarter of 2000.

31-Jul-00 BEFORE THE OPEN
BreezeCOM (BRZE) 31 7/8: Reports Q2 earnings of $0.08 a share, $0.06 better than the First Call consensus of $0.02; revenues rose 138.5% to $24.50 mln from a year-ago of $10.27 mln;
14-Jul-00 AFTER THE CLOSE
BreezeCOM (BRZE) 46 +5 1/2: -- Update -- Company files to offer 4.3 mln shares in a secondary offering.

14-Jul-00 14:00 -- 15:00 ET
BreezeCOM (BRZE) 45 1/4 +4 3/4: Announces it expects Q2 sales of $24.5 mln vs $10.3 mln in the year-ago period; expects earnings of $2.5 mln vs a net loss of $1.5 mln; First Call estimate is $0.02 per share;

23-Mar-00 13:34 ET
Breezecom (BRZE) 40 1/2 +20 1/2: --Update-- IPO opens for trading.

Analysts and Others

Midcoast Wireless is a division of Rockland, Maine Internet Service Provider Midcoast Internet Solutions. The parent company delivers the usual dialup services as well as ISDN (although since most people who are close enough to a phone-switching office for ISDN are also close enough for ADSL, which is less expensive and many times faster, one imagines ISDN will go away).
What Midcoast Wireless is offering is, essentially, a wireless LAN on a broader scale. You put an Ethernet card in your computer, connect it to a BreezeCom radio transmitter, and that communicates with one of eight antenna or repeater broadcast sites. They're in Camden, Owl's Head, Rockport, and Union. Towns close by, like Thomaston, are also served. Monthly costs can be much less than T1 and the company claims performance similar to other broadband methods. So you get a fast connection that requires no wiring and no additional costs (phone lines, etc.). And since BreezeCom made its name developing communication systems to keep tanks in the Israeli army connected during battle, you know reliability should be acceptable.
digitalmass.com

A typical business customer sees the payback vs. a leased line in a matter of three to six months. MIS has found that most customers who think they need a T1 really only need the speed of that T1. Wireless access provides all the advantages of increased speed without having to pay the high price of dedicated service.
Using BreezeCOM’s wireless LAN technology has also enabled MIS to generate additional savings in its own operation. It has replaced several internal leased lines with wireless links, reducing its monthly phone bills by literally thousands of dollars, while at the same time increasing system reliability. MIS envisions its entire internal network will one day be wireless. The company believes it can “cut the cord” and create redundant wireless links within its network for less cost than what it is currently paying for leased lines.
comnews.com

(Article on competitor, but highlights technology)
"For outdoor shows it is wonderful [since] the alternative is to string cable, and that is not practical when you have a large audience," Muth said. Recently, for example, IcebergMedia organized a Webcast of a Red Hot Chili Peppers show from downtown Toronto. To string cable would have been time-consuming and dangerous with so many people walking around, he said.
So Muth rigged up the Internet connection for his Webcast event by positioning the wireless bridges used by the WaveRider LMS product. It is a line-of-sight solution, which means the devices have to have a clear path to communicate. But, Muth said, it takes a minute to set up and works in good weather or bad.
Like Leyva, Muth stumbled across the wireless networking option when his firm was moving to a new building and discovered it could not get other types of broadband Internet access in the new digs for at least three months. To solve that dilemma, the company connected to its previous location through LMS. It was a roundabout way to get speedy access to the Net, but it worked. As a result of his experience, Muth is constantly thinking about how he can use wireless technology to expand his business.
For Muth's vision to come true, broadband wireless-based services will have to become more widely available. But that's beginning to happen as carriers start building out their networks and wireless ISPs (Internet service providers) jump on board. One such wireless ISP, North Rock Communications Ltd., in Hamilton, Bermuda, began offering customers Internet access using the WaveRider LMS equipment out of necessity. zdnet.com.

Wireless Internet - It's A Breeze
by Dale Baker back
Everywhere you go, you hear the buzz – wireless Internet is taking the world by storm. The Europeans have been sending E-mail from their hand-held Nokia and Ericsson phones for more than a year, while Palm Pilots and Research In Motion’s (Nasdaq: RIMM) Blackberry portables are going fully interactive in the US. All the major wireless players are jumping on board.
How you can profit from the trend? Start with a little known Israeli company called BreezeCOM (Nasdaq: BRZE). BreezeCom IPO’ed on March 23 when the tech market was just starting to crumble. The drop from the high 40’s to a low under 20 didn’t win BRZE too many fans. Too bad, because BRZE is exactly the kind of small cap tech stock you want to own in today’s rebounding market. How would you like to buy a successful company for $37 per share with the potential to go up 50-100%? Would you like it even better if you knew that insiders still own 92% of the stock and mutual funds already own more than half the 2 million shares sold in the IPO?
That’s a recipe for a vertical liftoff if BRZE continues to execute. BRZE sells a variety of wireless systems like their BreezeNET line, which allows corporations to set up wireless LANs. According to IDC, BRZE already dominates the building-to-building wireless bridging market for networks with a 49% share. More important, the new BreezeACCESS family lets ISP’s offer instant wireless access to their customers. How many ISP’s worldwide will need to add wireless service in the next few years? Thousands.
A quick look at some of BreezeCOM’s customers shows how wide their appeal has become – Broadlink, CAIS Internet, Tele2 in the UK, WiBand Communications in Canada and Lina.Net in Iceland. One nationwide US ISP followed their initial $12 million order with another $6.7 million order for additional BreezeCOM equipment. An ISP owner in Connecticut had nothing but praise for the BreezeCOM equipment he is currently deploying. “It is good equipment…about the best out there for ISP’s. Every ISP I talk to that uses them, speaks very highly of not just the products, but also the BreezeCOM engineers that stand behind the product. Outstanding service.” BRZE recently introduced the MMDS (Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Services) version of its BreezeACCESS line. Users get up to 3Mbps speeds for data and voice. The MMDS line uses both Time Division Duplex (TDD) and Frequency Hopping – Code Division Multiple Access (FH-CDMA) to make the most of the available spectrum.
This is state of the art stuff. One conversation can bounce around multiple channels as the data load requires, without the user ever noticing. A recent report by the Phillips Group noted that most big companies contemplating a wireless network are insisting on VOIP (Voice Over Internet Protocol), essentially a blend of data and voice where a traditional conversation is reduced to digital packets and switched through the network like regular Internet transmissions, instead of tying up a single voice circuit for the whole conversation. The company gets mobile voice communications and data traffic on the same network. Thanks to BreezeACCESS, that is.
The system is also scalable in size and quality of service. BreezeACCESS offers Quality of Service prioritizing for voice traffic over data packets and Toll Quality Telephony based on the H.323 Voice over IP protocol. ISP’s can start small if they like, then adding premium quality services without having to revamp their whole network. OK, BRZE has terrific products and a growing list of satisfied customers. But is this company another money-losing dot.com wannabe with huge losses and no hopes of turning a profit for years? Nope. The three analysts with Strong Buy ratings on the stock project profitability this year. Last quarter, BRZE beat estimates by .03 and only lost a penny. Dig further and you find that 90% of the operating expenses (after cost of sales) were devoted to R&D and marketing. General administrative overhead was only 9% of the gross profit and 5% of gross revenues. Toss in the $4.86 per share in cash and no debt and you have a sterling balance sheet for a young tech company. First quarter sales came in at $15 million, yielding an annualized price-sales ratio of about 15 for a company that grew revenues 46% year over year and 22% sequentially. If BRZE maintains 20% sequential growth, annual revenue would come in at $80 million for a current PS ratio of only 10.
PSINet (Nasdaq: PSIX) also believes in BRZE evidenced by their direct investment in the BRZE IPO. PSIX has more than 50,000 business customers in the aerospace, finance, communications, computer data processing and related industries, government agencies and educational and research institutions, as well as other Internet service providers. Guess which wireless solutions PSIX will recommend to all those customers? BreezeACCESS and BreezeNET. CEO Michael Rothenberg noted that most of BRZE’s growth is coming from the ISP customers who contribute 50% of the company’s revenues. Overall, outdoor point-to-multipoint fixed installations make up 80% of business while wireless LANs for enterprises make up 20%. Often, CEO statements are full of hype. But there is plenty of proof to back up Rothenberg’s claims. “With our strong financial position, leading-edge technology and wide product offerings, we believe that BreezeCOM will consolidate its leadership position in the broadband wireless access market.” I couldn’t agree more. I expect BRZE to double from its current price in the next twelve months.
streetsideinvestor.com

16-Jun-00 USB Piper Jaffray Reiterated - Strong Buy
16-May-00 USB Piper Jaffray Reiterated - Strong Buy 03-May-00 USB Piper Jaffray Reiterated - Strong Buy 25-Apr-00 USB Piper Jaffray Reiterated - Strong Buy
17-Apr-00 USB Piper Jaffray Initiated - Strong Buy

17-Apr-00 11:00 -- 12:00 ET
BreezeCOM (BRZE) 23 1/8 -1 7/8: -- Update -- Dain Rauscher Wessels initiates coverage with a STRONG BUY rating and price target of $41. Breezecom Ltd. is a leader in low-cost, low frequency point to multipoint solutions. Brokerage firm initiating coverage participated in underwriting the recent IPO.


17-Apr-00 11:00 -- 12:00 ET
BreezeCOM (BRZE) 23 3/8 -1 5/8 : CIBC Wrld Mkts initiates coverage with a STRONG BUY rating and price target of $50. Brokerage firm initiating coverage participated in underwriting the recent IPO.

Numbers
Rev 12.7M to 15.6M to 24.5M Jun00 per dailystocks
EPS (0.05) to (0.01) to 0.08 per breifing.com Jun00
52-Week Low on 24-Apr-2000 $19.25
Recent Price $32.313
52-Week High on 18-July-2000 $53.125
Market Capitalization $815.6M
Shares Outstanding 25.2M
Float 2.00M
Price/Book (mrq*) 6.29
Price/Earnings N/A
Price/Sales (ttm) 9.26
Debt/Equity (mrq*) 0
Total Cash (mrq) $108.6M
Short Interest As of 10-July-2000
Shares Short 168.0K
Percent of Float 8.4%
Shares Short (Prior Month) 64.0K

Insiders
One buy and no sells, but this IPO lockup hasn’t occurred.
Institutions own 10% up from 3% the prior quarter.

Internet posts

I grow weary of talking about how much I love these last mile broarband wireless infrastrucure plays....but I do - I'm stymied that they are sitting where they are...from the recent IPO's to BRZE to the former DMIC I like them all - Honestly I haven't seen a more blatently opportune time to but a sector in ages.
The weird thing is that the Nokia and handset sell-off precipitated the sell-off on the group.....but they are completely UNRELATED - If I wasn't a short term trader, I'd buy a little of the whole group and just sit on them for a year or two. 8/16/00 on SI

First NTRO and BRZE's products do not overlap today because NTRO's products operate in the frequency bands of 10GHz and above, whilst BRZE's operate in the bands of 4GHz and below. This makes BRZE's per user cost today significantly lower so for the same revenue they have sold a lot more kit.
Secondly NTRO are only one actor not the first mover. I don't believe they have reported a real sale in Europe yet, whilst Alcatel have announced deals worth $300 mln in the last month, a high proportion of which is actually rebadged BRZE.
Third, Alcatel and I believe Ericsson have gone the BRZE route.
7/31/00 on Yahoo

anyone know why brze is valued at 1/3 the price of ntro.. ??? we have more revenue .. positive earnings.. I know a couple of fund managers have really pushed ntro. Seems odd they haven't done the same with brze.. I just bought more breeze at 34. couldnt resist.. 7/31/00 on Yahoo

Sequential revenue growth will be 66%, which translates into annualized growth of 759%.
The company has scalable model: loss of 200k on revenues of 15 mln and net income of 2.5 mln on revenues of 25 mln.
Scalable means, that earnings should grow fasted than revenues. It means that the company might as well double its net income by the next quarter.
For those who are bitching about the secondary --- need I remind you that JNPR had a secondary too. PHCM had one. FLSH had one.
the fact that insiders are selling in the seconday in the orderly manner means the following:
1. they won't be selling when lock up expires
2. underwriters have no problems placing the shares since all the secondaries are pre-subscribed.
7/30/00 on Yahoo

I've been seeing the excitement around Wi-LAN's 30 Mbps but if you take a deeper look into it you see the following:
Wi-LAN's 30 Mbps is nada, since it uses 10 MHz of band.
The thing is, wireless equipment needs to have a good spectral efficiency (i.e., bits/sec/Hz).
Wi-LAN only now introduces (and i'm not sure the product is avaliable) 30 Mbps in 10 MHz which gives 3 bits/sec/Hz.
BRZE has for more then 4 years in the market (BreezeNET) 3 Mbps in 1 MHz which gives, guess what, 3 bits/sec/Hz.
BRZE is speaking about OFDM and is probably planning a much better OFDM solution then what Wi-LAN is doing.
7/28/00 on yahoo

Secondary Priced @$35 yesterday. I don't know why it hasn't been announced. 7/28/00 on yahoo

Perhaps one of the best apples to apples comparisons can be done with WAVC.
ADAP, Wi-LAN, and many others just build part of the pieces. Breezecom and WaveRider offer complete lines of solutions to ISPs and businesses. Breezecom and WaveRider both offer LAN connectivity to the internet.
Cisco doesn't have a solution on the market yet, other than its wireless LANs, although its pushing to get some products out.
Lucent's Orinoco solution is basically a mobile type solution, where people can get internet access while roaming within a small covered area, like a university.
On earnings, nobody else preannounced that earnings would come in 400% above estimates. :)
7/27/00 on yahoo

Wi-LAN does 32 Mbps - NOW.
Breezecom does only 11Mbps..
If you are into BRZE you are buying a future consumer of WIN.TO's patented technology - end of story
7/21/00 on yahoo

Somebody please explain why current shareholders should not be extremely disappointed in the latest news regarding the follow-on offering... I'm not techinical enough to understand all the details, but it seems like it's money out of our respective pockets? 7/14/00 on RB

While Breezecom sells in this market, they outsource the hardware, as do many of the other players in the list. The article is also the result of lab testing, as opposed to real world field testing, and is specifically addressing the LAN requirement of the hardware, and the focus of BreezeCOM is in the ISP/Last Mile area. It is regrettable that they chose to not test these in real world conditions, as their results would have likely been extremely different, especially in the presense of any other DSSS hardware.
In summary, while the review is OK for the LAN segment, it has little to nothing to do with the the existing and future market for BreezeCOM. Over 1000 ISPs use BreezeCOM gear, and most of them are using the FHSS products, not the DSSS units. 7/11/00 on yahoo

BRZE sells a variety of wireless systems like their BreezeNET line, which allows corporations to set up wireless LANs. According to IDC, BRZE already dominates the building-to-building wireless bridging market for networks with a 49% share. More important, the new BreezeACCESS family lets ISP’s offer instant wireless access to their customers. How many ISP’s worldwide will need to add wireless service in the next few years? Thousands. 49% of the wireless radio building to building market. And wireless has already begun to take off like a rocket. The next two years for wireless is going to be amazing! 7/5/00 on RB

Breezecom is on fire - 23% sequential revenue growth last quarter, MAKING MONEY, an IPO that was oversubscribed by 15 times. 6/27/00 on RB

"What would keep aironet/csco from developing FHSS and stomping all over BRZE with their distribution/money/service/etc.?" Nothing, except Cisco doesn't "develop"anything anymore.
They just buy the companies that make the technology they want. So your worry should be "what do we do if Cisco decides to come along and throw money at us until we are drowning and have to beg them to please stop shoveling the cash higher and higher...". 6/26/00 on yahoo

My ISP in rural Illinois is using brze products for wireless also. If we wait for the phone company to bring us high speed it will be a very long wait! 6/22/00

I did look into Waveriders products about 6 months ago. This was before they even had their products available for sale. I understand that they are going to release something this quarter, or may have already released it. Their technology uses Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS), whereas the new Breezecom gear uses Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS).
We have pretty much decided to use the FHSS gear because of its robustness in areas where their could be a lot of interference and its high level of security. 3/31/00 on SI

Chart
Two biggest day in the last three months were red, Tracks the Nasdaq fairly well. Went from $52 to $32 in two weeks of July. Very tight stack 50/200/10.

breezecom.com

Summary
A hidden gem. A profitable wireless tech company. 138% rev increase per breifing,com, 100 for present P/E so it not overpriced Small float make this difficult to hold when runups occur. Some silly knocks on owning stocks from Israel. Owned ECIL in the early 1990’s and did well. Just have to pay the foreign tax on Israel stocks. Downside is $10 and upside is $20 short term by next quarter. A must through earnings, because an upside will send it higher. Momentum players left in the tech drop in July so Monday is good as any for an entry. Better sales, marketcap, and balance sheet than for WAVC.
Jack



To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (605)8/20/2000 11:08:20 PM
From: Jack Hartmann  Respond to of 6912
 
W) Is SSTI a flash in the pan?
Rated a Watch

Reason for DD
Passed the Mid-summer screen test

Business
Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. is a supplier of flash memory semiconductor devices for the digital consumer, networking, wireless communication and Internet computing markets. Flash memory is nonvolatile memory that does not lose data when the power source is removed and is capable of electrically erasing selected blocks of data. The Company offers over 40 products based on its SuperFlash design and manufacturing process technology. The Company also offers mass storage products that are used for storing images, music and other data in devices such as digital cameras and MP3 players. The Company licenses its SuperFlash technology to leading semiconductor companies including Analog Devices, ATMI, IBM, ISD, Motorola, Samsung, Sanyo, Seiko-Epson and TSMC to embed in semiconductor devices that integrate flash memory with other functions on a single chip.

Competitors
AMD, INTC, SNE

News
8/3/2000 SSTI responds to concerns--1:50 pm - By Chris Kraeuter
Silicon Storage Technology (SSTI: news, msgs) responded to concerns that a slowdown in cellular comonents will negatively affect its business. Wednesday evening Lehman Bros. analyst Tim Luke said Motorola (MOT: news, msgs) will be cutting back its handset component consumption during the second half of the year (See 8:40 item). According to a statement, SST says less than 2 percent of its second quarter revenue comes from products sold in the cellular handset industry. "We do not expect that any slowdown in the cellular components market would impact SST in a material way. We continue to see strong growth in our business across the board and believe we are well-positioned to continue revenue and profit expansion well into 2001," said Bing Yeh, president and CEO. SST shares reversed earlier losses and are now up 11/16, or 1.2 percent, to 56 5/8.
Net revenues for the second quarter were $103.2 million, grew 66% from $62.3 million in the first quarter of 2000, and 349% from $23.0 million in the second quarter a year ago.
Net income for the second quarter of 2000 was $22.5 million, or $0.71 per share, based on approximately 31.9 million diluted weighted average shares outstanding. This compares with a net income of $9.6 million in the first quarter of 2000, or $0.34 per share, based on approximately 28.3 million diluted weighted average shares outstanding, and with a net loss in the second quarter of 1999 of $3.6 million, or a loss of $0.15 per share, based on approximately 23.7 million weighted average shares outstanding.
``We are pleased to report record results for the third consecutive quarter. Our business continued to be driven by the strong demand for our products and by the production ramp of over 50 new products, most of which were introduced over the past several quarters,'' said Bing Yeh, president and CEO. ``Demand for our products continues to outstrip our capability to supply. We expect to continue increasing our capacity to meet the growing demand.
``During the second quarter, we continued to execute our diversification strategy by expanding our market presence in a very broad range of applications in the digital consumer, networking, wireless communications and Internet computing markets. We saw strong growth of product shipments in many applications including set-top boxes, digital TVs, CD-RW drives, DVD-ROM drives, DVD players, MP3 players, network switches and routers, DSL modems, pagers, cellular phones and cordless telephones. We have also shipped over 500,000 units of Intel 800 series chipset compatible 4Mbit Firmware Hub product for PC BIOS applications during the June month.
``During the second quarter, we also continued to execute on our product proliferation strategy by developing more differentiated products to serve targeted applications including future generation cellular phone, wireless modem, Global Positioning System, Bluetooth, Internet Appliance, small disk drive, electronic organizer, smart card and video games. ``We believe the flash market will become more and more fragmented, characterized by the coexistence and continued growth of all memory densities and various configurations to meet the specific requirements in each of the emerging broad applications. As a result, we believe our strategy of diversified product offerings and technology licensing for embedded applications not only will maximize our growth potential, but also can minimize our business fluctuations due to the seasonal weakness of any particular application segment. ``With more than 50 new products introduced since mid-1998 that serve a wide variety of applications, the additional wafer capacity that we expect to bring on line in 2001 and more than 40 new volume purchase and supply agreements that we expect to sign with our customers, we believe SST is well positioned to take advantage of the current industry upturn. Looking forward, we expect to see robust growth in our business through the balance of 2000 and well into 2001,'' he said

CC notes 7/19/00
-103M in rev
- 10% revs in wireless
- 23% Japan/Korea rev, 16% China
- 44% gross margin vs 26% a year ago
- 5% in sales and markets
- 3.7M in G&A
- 27% operating profit vs losses last year.
- 216M in cash/securities
- 84.6M in accounts receivables
- Demand two times capacity
- Trying to be leade4r in 8Mb and under products
- Internet appliance, GPS, video games, Bluetooth, are some of our target sales area
- Believe diversified product category minimize sector downturn
- NSM licensing agreement for super-flash technology
- 3Q will be affected be increase tax rate, 25% sequential growth resuming in Q4
- No customer more than 5%, Gross margin should be flat due taxes
- Believe some double booking, but can only deliver so much due to demand,
- Really don’t see much competition in the low end which is our target area. High end memory is much more competitive.
- Said AMD telling customer to use 32Mb product because lower memory products won’t be produced anymore.

Analysts and Others
A strong case can be made that AMD's shares are undervalued. The shares are actually trading at a discount to what the firm's flash unit could trade for on its own, assuming that it would command a trailing price/sales ratio similar to those of pure-flash players like Silicon Storage Technology (Nasdaq: SSTI - news) and SanDisk (Nasdaq: SNDK - news). Of course, AMD is not a pure play on the flash market, but as of the end of 1999, it was second in market share behind Intel.
biz.yahoo.com

Meanwhile, SST's share earnings of $0.71 blew the doors off of the Wall Street consensus, and even some of the highest ``whisper'' numbers that had been circulating in the investment community. That's compared to a $0.15 per-share loss for the year-ago period. In addition, the revenue mix by product application appears to show healthy diversification, which would enable it to better withstand a demand shift in any one area. Check out some of these numbers: Digital consumer applications revenue (47% of the second quarter total) are up 474% year-over-year Networking (17%) -- +580% Wireless Communications (10%) -- +2668% Internet Computing (26%) -- +175%
Management indicated strength across a wide range of products, including set-top boxes, digital TVs, computer peripherals (CD-RWs, DVD-ROMs), network switches and routers, pagers, among others.
But, since last week's earnings release, the stock has languished.
What gives? It primarily has to do with one fact that many individual investors underemphasize when weighing an earnings release against the stock's current valuation:
The numbers are backward-looking. In the case of SST, most of the investment community had anticipated an upside surprise for the quarter. Granted, the extent to which it beat expectations should factor somewhat into a valuation adjustment. But what Wall Street was really looking for was some clarity as to the health of its future prospects. Specifically, what the flash memory market and its business will look like going forward. While management should be applauded for its strong level of guidance, and frank discussions during the conference call, as well as its stellar performance to date, the dialogue brought as many lingering questions to the table as it did answers. The picture through the end of the year, though, seems to be pretty clear: SST's strong operating performance should continue. Management indicated it is looking for better than 25% sequential revenue growth in both the third and fourth quarters. Gross margins, however, should remain relatively flat, as it expects to encounter increased costs to ramp up manufacturing at geometries of 0.18 microns and below, which is necessary to produce higher-end, higher-density (16 Mb and above) chips. In addition, earnings will be fully taxed beginning this quarter. The new tax rate in the range of 33%-35%, compared with a 26% rate in the second quarter, and just 4% a year ago, will likely mute earnings growth for the third quarter, then accelerate in line with revenue growth through the year's end.
Currently, SST faces little competition in its strongest product segment - flash memory with densities of 2Mb and below, which accounted for 80% of the company's unit shipments in the second quarter. In fact, management stated that demand is more than double the supply of many of its products, which should ensure that both order growth and pricing will remain firm. Moreover, the question of whether or not flash memory prices are flattening in the spot market should not materially affect SST. That's because nearly 100% of its chip shipments are contracted through Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), and most of which will continue to pay premium prices while the chips are still in short supply.
So what's the catch? Well, none, really. But the extent to which SST can rake in the profits in 2001 and beyond is still quite cloudy at this stage. Here's why: The sweet spot in the 2Mb and below flash memory market will ultimately give way to technology that requires flash memory with increasing complexity and density. When the majority of SST's business shifts toward chips with densities of 16Mb and above, they enter the arena where some large and powerful competitors operate.
The list includes Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD - news), Intel (NASDAQ: INTC - news), ST Micro (NYSE:STM - news) , Atmel (NASDAQ: ATML - news) and others. In fact, AMD and Intel are already aggressively promoting the adoption of more complex chips over lower-end solutions to its customers. A move further into the high-density mass-data-storage market would bring competition from SanDisk (NASDAQ: SNDK - news) and M-Systems (NASDAQ: FLSH - news), which are already established players here. The industry is rushing to bring new capacity online. Starting in 2001, the influx of new capacity may well start to balance the supply/demand picture, while it would likely intensify competition and potential pricing pressure. In this scenario, order bookings should also be watched closely. Typically, in a market of undersupply, companies desperate for a product will overbook orders with a number of suppliers, in hopes that most or all of its needs will be fulfilled. Overbooking likely exists in many flash memory orders, which may lead to a sharp number of cancellations once new supplies actually reach the market. Also, SST is a ``fabless'' flash producer; it depends on foundry agreements with Sanyo (NASDAQ: SANYY - news), Taiwan Semiconductor (NYSE: TSM - news), Seiko, Samsung, and National Semiconductor (NYSE: NSM - news) . In a tight-supply environment, SST may not be able to produce the quality and quantity of chips it desires through third-party manufacturing channels.
Going forward, further margin improvement may well prove difficult for SST. Silicon wafer prices were up 5% to 8% in the second quarter, the first such increase in years, and management stated that more price hikes are likely on the way. In addition, the shift in mix toward higher-end chips should increase production costs beyond the company's year-end guidance. That's not to say SST's future beyond the year's end is all doom and gloom. For one, SSTI's SuperFlash technology seems to have a number of competitive advantages, in terms of cost, scalability, reliability, and the flexibility for use in both low-density and high-density flash applications. As a result, any erosion of SST's current customer base may be minimal, provided it can produce the necessary product in sufficient quantities. Licensing revenue, which only generated about 1% of second-quarter revenue, should receive a boost on the heels of its new deal with Apacer, a subsidiary of Acer Inc., the Taiwanese firm best known for its line of PCs. Through the agreement, Apacer will exclusively use SST's proprietary SuperFlash ATA controller and firmware in its products (including set-top boxes, network computers, PDAs, cell phones, etc.) beginning with shipments next month. Furthermore, the company announced it had begun firmware shipments for a new Intel PC chipset in material quantities, which may further boost revenue through 2001.
Management also indicated it is working on removable flash memory solutions to support applications for the emerging Bluetooth short-range wireless standard and third-generation (3G) wireless phones. SST is currently working with Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOM - news) and Samsung on chipset and handset solutions, respectively, for the cellular phone market, which only represents about 2% of total revenue to date. Nonetheless, we remain firm on our admittedly controversial downgrade of SST shares for now.
Remember, we first recommended SST on 3/10/99 for our April 1999 Special Situations Report newsletter at just $3.06 a share. SSR subscribers who invested in SST then have hauled in a whopping 2,643% return in the 17 months leading up to our downgrade on July 6, at $83.94 a share.
In addition, SST was recommended for this year's Magic25 portfolio back on November 9, 1999, at $23.75 a share - a 253% return in eight months. To put it simply, the risks just seem to outweigh the potential rewards to leave these kinds of profits on the table at this juncture.
biz.yahoo.com

In his July 5 call, Joseph cut the chip sector to neutral from outperform, pointing to higher inventories, softer prices and a spike in spending as possible signs of a top. In the note, he cut his ratings on Advanced Micro Devices, National Semiconductor, Silicon Storage Technology and Texas Instruments. (Of those companies, Solly has performed recent underwriting for Advanced Micro and Silicon Storage.)
thestreet.com

Numbers
Revs 23.0M to 35.1M to 48.3M to 62.3M to 103.2M Jun00 per daily stocks
EPS (0.07) to 0.02 to 0.21 to 0.34 to 0.71 Jun00 per briefing.com before 4 to 1 split
So last Q was 0.14 split adjusted. Next quarter is estimated by Zacks has 0.22 for next quarter, and 0.27 for Dec00. Interesting to see if this split affect brokeage’s computers for screening stocks.
52-Week Low on 24-Sep-1999 $4.021
Recent Price $24.875
52-Week High on 22-June-2000 $38.896
Market Capitalization $2.22B
Shares Outstanding 89.2M
Float 75.0M
Price/Book (mrq) 6.57
Price/Earnings (ttm) 58.67
Price/Sales (ttm) 8.59
Short Interest As of 10-July-2000
Shares Short 4.79M
Percent of Float 6.4%
Shares Short (Prior Month) 1.54M

Insiders
3 Buys and 12 sells in 2000
49% institutional up from 11% three quarters ago.

Internet posts
Silicon Storage: A Flash in the Pan? by Chris Connor
Silicon Storage {SSTI}, a flash memory maker, is definitely on a roll. Over the past year, SSTI has ascended over 300 percent as both revenues and earnings have been skyrocketing. Earnings have been soaring to such a degree that Silicon Storage has blown earnings estimates away in its last five quarters. Over those last five quarters, Silicon Storage beat estimates by 46.15 percent, 100 percent, 10.53 percent, 47.83 percent, and 73.17 percent (in order of occurrence). Silicon Storage appeared in a search that looks for mid-cap companies that offer substantial upside potential, entitled Mid-Cap Magic.
A Leader in an Explosive Industry
It would be difficult to find a technology in a better space than that currently occupied by flash memory. Flash memory can benefit from not only the dynamic growth of data storage, but also from the continued explosion of wireless devices. The rapidly burgeoning and proliferating devices such as digital cameras, MP3 players, notebook computers, PDAs, and Internet-enabled phones require flash memory cards to store data. These wireless devices use these cards because flash memory cards are small, removable, can hold many more times the data than a floppy disk can hold, and are able to retain data after the device is turned off. According to semiconductor market research firm IC Insight, flash memory will be an $18.3 billion industry by 2003 after seeing a global demand of $4.6 billion last year.
Silicon Storage stands out from other flash memory makers because of one very important characteristic: speed. Silicon Storage claims that its flash memory card is able to sustain a write speed (the speed of inputting data to the card) of 1.4 megabytes per second. SSTI's card is so fast largely because of its dual-port SRAM (static random-access memory) buffer. This buffer allows a user to write to the buffer while the buffer writes to the flash memory simultaneously. In addition to the dual-port buffer, Silicon Storage's card augments its market-leading speed by employing a direct channel from the buffer to the flash memory - thereby eliminating steps and enhancing performance. Flash memory speed is most crucial to digital cameras because flash memory determines the rate at which a digital camera can take consecutive shots.
Surprising Valuation
Normally, a leading company in a rapidly growing industry that posts the kind of growth numbers that Silicon Storage has been registering commands a rich premium for its stock price. However, that is not the case with Silicon Storage. As Silicon Storage's Financial Overview demonstrates, SSTI sports a PE ratio of only 48.46. While SSTI's PE is above the market's (S&P 500's) PE ratio of 33.54, its PE is still substantially lower than other rapidly growing storage companies such as Brocade {BRCD}, Network Appliance {NTAP}, Emulex {EMLX} and JNI {JNIC}. For example, analysts expect JNI and Silicon Storage will each grow their earnings at rates of 37.5 percent per year over the next five years, but JNI is valued considerably higher with an astronomical PE ratio of over 300. Furthermore, SSTI has a price-to-sales ratio of 7.1, while the S&P has a higher price-to-sales ratio of 8.68. It is not every day that a leader in a hot industry is priced below the market, based on sales.
Looking Forward
In the future, Silicon Storage has a largely-untapped opportunity in providing flash memory to the cell phone market. Despite working relationships with Qualcomm {QCOM} and Samsung, Silicon Storage derives only about 2 percent of its sales from the cell phone market. (Most of Silicon Storage's sales were derived from products such as digital cameras, MP3s, network routers, set-top boxes, computer peripherals, and pagers 8/20/00 on yahoo

An article in the Economist stated that SSTI is in a very good position to grow and dominate the flash memory market because it is focused on flash memory. It also a stated that the demand for flash memory will be intense worldwide for years to come. I see a spit a year for 5 years! Hold and Keep buying! We will all do well! 8/20/00 in yahoo

I see SNDK finally getting above $80 and if the market is really good, then I could see a move to the $100/to $110 area. That is not a new high, SSTI on the other hand, I believe could get to the mid $30 and possibly to $42/$45 or so, a new high. I am long both (CYMI as well). 8/20/00 on SI

Chart
Dipped below $18 during tech correction in July and risen to present level on weak volume. Tight 50/10/200 stack. $20 seems to be a good bottom looking at the one year chart.

Links
ssti.com

Summary
Yahoo thread is one big mess. CC on vcall is interesting as they are very focused on their strength. Price running like the sector cyclical. It is of course, but when the cycle ends is anyone’s guess. I like the niche that SSTI is pursuing in the low density sector. Company has penetrated all continents with sales to all major countries. I constantly listen to CC where shortage of flash memory exists. This recent rise is on weak volume so is a WATCH. Short term downside is a return to $20 and upside is a new high. Risk/reward is favorable. This moves with the SOX so rightly or wrongly, it will decline with it. Have to sleep on this one.
Jack



To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (605)8/23/2000 6:16:26 AM
From: Jack Hartmann  Respond to of 6912
 
W) Is INRS ripping?
Rated a WATCH

Reason for DD

Passed the mid-summer screen

Business

IntraNet Solutions, Inc. is a provider of Web content management solutions for intranets, extranets and the Internet. The Company addresses an organization's complex needs in publishing, updating and maintaining its Web sites by providing a comprehensive solution that eliminates administrative bottlenecks and automatically publishes content from native formats directly to the Web. The Company's Xpedio Content Management Suite automatically converts source content into Web-based formats, which are then dynamically published to a secure Web site on an intranet, extranet or the Internet. The Intra.doc! product line is a cost-effective suite of Web-based software products for organizations requiring sophisticated content management without the robust publishing capabilities of Xpedio.

Competitors

The market for Web content management solutions is intensely competitive, subject to rapid technological change and significantly affected by new product introductions and other market activities of industry participants. We expect competition to persist and intensify in the future. Our primary source of competition is from Web content management products targeted at large Internet Web sites, including those offered by companies such as Documentum, Inc., Interwoven, Inc. and Vignette Corporation.

News

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 22, 2000--IntraNet Solutions®, Inc. (Nasdaq: INRS - news), a leading provider of end-to-end Web content management solutions for the enterprise, today announced the integration of its Outside In® viewing technology with Compaq's iPAQ Home Internet Appliance. Through the Outside In integration, iPAQ customers can view native files on Web sites or email attachments on their iPAQ Web terminal without running the native application.

07-Aug-00 08:16 ET
IntraNet Solutions (INRS) 40 5/8: Supplier of Web content management solutions in deal with Yahoo! (YHOO) to provide users of Yahoo!Mail with a new e-mail file attachment viewing feature that converts a user's e-mail attachment to HTML for viewing through the browser.

EDEN PRAIRIE--(BUSINESS WIRE)--July 27, 2000-- IntraNet Solutions®, Inc. (Nasdaq: INRS - news), a leading provider of Web content management software for the enterprise, announced today its financial results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2000 of fiscal year 2001.
First quarter revenues were $9.46 million, an increase of 113% over the $4.45 million reported for the same period last year and 26% sequentially over the $7.51 million reported in the prior quarter. Net income was $3.15 million, exclusive of a non-cash equity charge of $163,000, or earnings of $0.14 per diluted share, compared to $0.02 per diluted share for the quarter ended June 30, 1999. License revenues represented approximately 79% and service revenues 21% of the total gross revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2000.
``Our Xpedio Content Management software products continue to show extremely strong growth, accounting for over 77% of our license revenues just three quarters after our launch of the product. Our average license transaction size was about $164,000, representing a 134% increase over the prior year, reflecting our continued success in winning enterprise transactions.''
``We again had strong new customer adoption with over 35 new accounts, representing a broad range of industries with organizations such as the Australian Stock Exchange, the County of Fresno, National City Corporation, Oglethorpe Power, Praxair, Primerica Financial Services and the United Nations. We also continued our rollouts across large existing accounts such as Agilent, Cargill, Hewlett-Packard, IKON, Merrill Lynch and Qwest Communications.

10-Jul-00 AFTER THE CLOSE
Inso Corp (INSO) 5 1/4 -1/8: Company announces they have sold their Information Exchange division to IntraNet Solutions, Inc. (INRS) for approximately $55 mln cash;

In June 2000, IntraNet Solutions is included in the Russell 3000 Index, which measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization.

In April, IntraNet Solutions' cash position exceeds $150 million as underwriters of its public offering exercise their option to acquire an additional 520,000 shares of common stock at a price of $46.00 per share.

Analysts and others

11-Jul-00 13:00 -- 14:00 ET
IntraNet Solutions (INRS) 38 -1/2 : Wit SoundView reiterates BUY rating and price target of $52; believes that content management is one of hottest spaces around, and INRS is executing effectively.

27-Mar-00 11:00 -- 12:00 ET
IntraNet Solutions (INRS) 52 1/16 +2 1/16: Dain Rauscher Wessels upgrades to STRONG BUY from BUY and raises price target to $100 from $70 based on excellent business momentum and visibility.


15-Mar-00 10:00 -- 11:00 ET
IntraNet Solutions, Inc. (INRS) 50 7/16 -15/16: Wit SoundView initiates coverage with a BUY and price target of $100.

Numbers
Rev 3.5M to 4.6M to 5.8M to 7.5M to 9.5M Jun00 per dailycharts
EPS 0.01to (0.09) to 0.04 to 0.07 to 0.13 Jun00 per daily charts
EPS est for Sep is 0.09 per yahoo and 0.10 for Dec00. Note yahoo and PR has Jun earnings at 0.03.
52-Week Low on 26-Aug-1999 $6.875
Recent Price $43.563
52-Week High on 14-Mar-2000 $55.50
Market Capitalization $927.7M
Shares Outstanding 21.3M
Float 17.7M
Price/Book (mrq) 5.55
Price/Earnings (ttm) 372.33
Price/Sales (ttm) 32.56
Debt/Equity (mrq) 0
Total Cash (mrq) $154.5M As of June 30, 2000, we had $4.6 million in cash and equivalents, $149.8 million in short-term investments and $162.4 million in working capital.
Shares Short 461.0K
Percent of Float 2.6%
Shares Short (Prior Month) 336.0K

IWOV numbers
Market Capitalization $3.95B
Shares Outstanding 49.4M
Float 30.1M
Price/Book (mrq) 16.97
Price/Earnings N/A
Price/Sales (ttm) 54.34

Insiders
2 sells and no buys in 2000
Hmmmm. Institutions dropped from 65% to 47%Jun00. Fidelity and Intel biggest sellers.

Internet Posts
Robert Olson was on CNBC this afternoon on power lunch, said that Xpedio 4.0 is shipping now, priced from $40,000 to $180,000. It generates more than 77 percent of the company's license revenue. 8/14/00 on yahoo

no revenues listed with yahoo deal? Thats the problem the street wants to know rev.#s not hype. 8/7/00 on Yahoo

These guys were a SHELL two yrs ago-Sports Equip 8/2/00 on RB

.03 profit from operations .08+ from income. might as well close down as they make more from putting money in cds at the bank. I think if interest rates go up we could have another blowout qtr. LOL 7/31/00 on yahoo

Oh and that secondary what a stupid move on mgmt's part. Now we have 150m raised at the market peak for aquisitions in this valley. Shame on them 7/28/00 on Yahoo

Well I've gotten one response so far to my analysis of INRS regarding Content Management. Anyone else care to help, or shoot it all down? (message 28287: Message 14066684 ) 7/19/00 on SI

I'm trying to apply the Gorilla Game to a very personal situation: my job. I'm trying to see if my new employer (Intranet Solutions, INRS) is in a royalty or gorilla game. I know there's an answer I'd prefer <g>, but I'd rather be shot down horribly and learn something than wear rose colored glasses. I'm also not necessarily looking for definitive answers (though that would be nice), but also how to go about finding the answers. The following is a first draft, and a starting point for further analysis. One final disclaimer: I shamelessly plugged my technology when I thought it relevant <g>.
A. Is there a discontinuous innovation or a proprietary open architecture?
Does this ( outsideinserver.com ) count as a discontinuous innovation? It allows dynamic, on-the-fly, templated, server side conversion of just about any file format into HTML (and I give you one guess what markup language is next). Just about any innovation is discontinuous to some degree, so where do you draw the line (especially in technology)?
B. Does it have the potential to grow into a mass market phenomenon, become a standard?
As a part of a larger, cohesive content management suite, I believe it does, along with this client-side viewing technology: ie.inso.com
C. Are there high barriers to entry and high switching costs?
Dealing with over 200 file formats along with the architecture to be flexible provides for a high barrier to entry for the file viewing/conversion side. Switching from one content management system to another is painful as far as I know.
D. Have value chains developed?
I was hoping someone could help me find more information to answer this one. I don't understand the value chains around content management very well (yet).
E. Have they crossed the chasm?
From the Broadvision analysis ( people.ne.mediaone.net ):
I believe that here the answer would be yes. I certainly would not expect companies like Sears and Wal-Mart to commit their e-commerce initiatives to unproven, risky technology. Furthermore, I think the fact that the company has taken its base product and created specialized versions for specific industries is reflective of a company operating in the bowling alley.
This is part of the Gorilla Game that I have trouble with when dealing with non-consumer directed products. I can much more understand that when my technophobic friends and family are buying their first cell-phones, that the mobile communication industry is well past the chasm. How can I get an insight into business software?
F. Existence of hypergrowth?
Again from the Broadvision analysis:
Revenue growth over the last year was 122%. Quite respectable, but not quite up to tornado standards. Still, it's hard to argue that e-commerce in general is in the midst of a huge tornado.
I work for Intranet Solutions, so I'd rather just point to the SEC filings and let them speak for themselves
7/19/00 on SI

If you look at anyone else in this market space INRS is in a better position both in product and finances than anyone. They just doubled their sales and marketing force with this aquisition as well as the r&d group. Many MANY! tech stocks out there have no earnings whatsoever? You cant look at P/E and pick a stock anymore. INRS has a very appealing story to institutional buyers who I would be willing to bet know a bit more than you.
7/11/00 on yahoo

one other thing. the division they purchased yesterday actually showed an eight percent decline from the previous year. It might be profitable, but was it worth 55 million? 7/11/00 on yahoo

If you look at the history of INSO as a company, they went through a pretty big scandal last year which devalued their stock tremendously. Previously, they were a high-on-the-hog technology company sucking up companies like they were going out of style. More recently, they have been peddling off these same companies to stay afloat. Interestingly enough, they have a Web Content Management System called Dynabase...

As for the technology mentioned in the press release, check out the INSO site. Looks like viewing technology to facilitate dynamic content conversion to HTML. Says they can support "dynamic conversion" of over 250 file formats... My guess is that this will further expand the Content Viewing capabilities of the core Xpedio line to make its content support more robust. Sounds like it will only make the company stronger in their offerings! 6/27/00 on yahoo

INRS is the only co. that offers front-end and back-end solutions in content management and soon they're going to support Linux apps as well. 6/21/00 on SI

INRS must have been lost in the shuffle. Again, apologies to everyone who gives me picks that I just don't have time to DD. 1/25/00 on SI

Chart
Ran from May low of $q18 to mid$40’s where it consolidating. Many green days so buyers are accumulating. Nice 10/50/200 stack and separation.

Link

Summary
I really hate the symbol. Bouts of dylexsia hit me with this stock. I started Dding IRSN first. 0.03 earnings in recent quarter per PR is not the company I thought it was so a rated a WATCH. From a 1997 10Q - On July 31, 1996, the Company, then named MacGregor Sports and Fitness, Inc. ("MSF") and IntraNet Integration Group, Inc.("IIGI," formerly known as Technical Publishing Solutions, Inc. ("TPSI"), founded in 1990) completed a reorganization (the "Merger"), pursuant to which IIGI became a wholly-owned subsidiary of MSF.

Alot of noise on INRS, but INTC and Fidelity bailing are not signs of strength. Chart is bullish, but stock should have declined after earnings.
Jack



To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (605)8/27/2000 11:51:17 PM
From: Jack Hartmann  Respond to of 6912
 
W) Surfing the MWAV
Rated a WATCH

Reason for DD

Made the summer screen

Business

M-Wave, Inc., operating through its wholly owned subsidiary, Poly Circuits, Inc., manufactures microwave printed circuit boards using Teflon-based laminates. In addition, it produces customer-specified bonded assemblies consisting of a printed circuit board bonded in some manner to a metal carrier or pallet. The Company has also developed the Flexlink process, the bonding of materials with dissimilar coefficients of thermal expansion, and the fusion bonding of Teflon based laminate for multi-layer circuit fabrication. The Company developed an enhanced version called Flexlink II in 1996. The Company's printed circuit boards and bonded assemblies are used in wireless communication systems and other devices and equipment operating in the microwave frequency spectrum of 800 MHz and above.

LITIGATION The Company is a party to various actions and proceedings related to its normal business operations. The Company believes 7 8 that the outcome of this litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

Net sales were $11,973,000 for the second quarter ended June 30, 2000, an increase of $10,077,000 or 531% above the second quarter of 1999. Net sales to Lucent were $10,537,000 in the second quarter of 2000 compared to $782,000 in the second quarter of 1999. Net sales to Spectrian were $299,000 in the second quarter of 2000 compared to $412,000 in the second quarter of 1999. Net sales to RF Power were $418,000 in the second quarter of 2000 compared to $137,000 in the second quarter of 1999.

Competitors
Flextronics | SCI Systems | Solectron
Per Hoovers

News

25-Jul-00 10:02 ET
M-Wave, Inc. (MWAV) 10 7/8 +2 31/32 (+37.5%): Manufacturer of high performance printed circuit boards used in wireless communications reports a Q2 profit of $0.33 a share, compared to a yr-ago loss of $0.10; sales rose 123% to $11.97 mln... volume 58K

Analysts and Other
None

Numbers
Rev 1.9M to 2.2M to 3.6M to 5.4M to 12.0M Jun00
EPS -.10 to -.22 to .01 to .07 to .33 Jun00
52-Week Low on 17-Nov-1999 $1.625
Recent Price $12.625
52-Week High on 9-Aug-2000 $16.125
Market Capitalization $28.8M
Shares Outstanding 2.28M
Float 1.40M
Price/Book (mrq*) 2.69
Price/Earnings (ttm) 64.41
Price/Sales (ttm) 1.25
Debt/Equity (mrq*) 0.20
Total Cash (mrq) $1.96M
Short Interest As of 10-July-2000
Shares Short 0
Shares Short (Prior Month) 2,000

Inventory went from $2,030,417 in December 99 to $6,775,931 in Jun00
Accounts payable $ 1,974,067 in Dec99 to $ 5,738,160 Jun00
Net cash flow $ 151,779 six months in Jun99 to $(1,719,621) Jun00 six months

Insiders
One insider sell and no buys in 2000
Four institutions accounting for 0.9% of shares out. 22K in total.

Internet Posts of Note

When Lucent spins off their microelectronics unit then MWAV will have 2 major customers. Lucent says this spinoff will allow faster growth for this unit and will not change suppliers and distributors 8/15/00 on yahoo

Does anyone remember what happened to this darling high flyer years ago?
Their one customer gave'em the heave-ho and they been fighting their way back since!
(If memory serves me, it was AT&T.) Hope they learned their lesson! 8/14/00 on yahoo

I Shorted MWAV @ $12.25 a few days ago. Looking at the chart it shot up to fast. I figured it would drop around $8.00 soon. It is the first stock I ever Shorted. So I wanted to keep it small. 7/31/00 on SI

2 contract manufactures for Lucent are set up for using MWAV's Flexlink bonding process so the royalties should start rolling in.Lucent plans on using MWAV's bonding process for all of their bonding needs.If these are big manufactures we could see some other companies jumping on board and really be big for MWAV in the licensing area.I suggest listing to the conference call at www.vcall.com for a replay before shorting this stock.MWAV reminds me of DIGL a little over a year ago when Lucent was their only big customer.Word got out and business boomed.Watch out shorts a sqeeze on a low volume stock can hurt.Remember KTEL. 7/27/00 on yahoo

The float is way too low and the action is too hot. I don't think that is an issue. I think the insitutions are waking up to mwav and so are the daytraders. It is really anybodys guess where this can go short term. Over the next 18 Mo this could be a 30+ stock. Then it will split. Another important issue is the fact that Joe said in the CC that they like the stock to be around 10 and will split accordingly. So I would't be surprised to see some of the big money run the stock up there to wait for the split. In fact that is probably why Joe went public with that comment. 7/27/00 on yahoo

Web, LU apparently likes MWAV's patented FlexLink bonding technology so much it's asked MWAV to license the technology to 2 other LU suppliers. 7/25/00 on SI

Margins sound like they will expand,customer base growing and backlog at 15 million.Customers changing their products to use FLEXLINK. 7/25/00 on Yahoo

On the subject of LU/MWAV, I want to tell you something really exciting and potentially very big deal for MWAV. LU is very enthusiastic about MWAV's virtual manufacturing model. Recognizing MWAV's years of experience in working with subcontractors, and its relationship with many Asian suppliers, LU has expressed a strong interest to let MWAV handle a large deal with an Asian manufacturer. This manufacturer visited LU this week and is meeting with Joe Turek at this very moment. In essence MWAV acts as the "general contractor" for LU to manage the manufacturing process in Asia. This is the kind of high margin, value-added services that fits into Turek's virtual manufacturing business model. It also allows MWAV to broaden its base into new products. 7/23/00 on SI

The opening of an office in Asia is part of MWAV's "virtual manufacturing" process to bring better value to clients while expanding the company operations in the States. It's good news all around. Joe Turek is setting Mr. Lee loose on the Flextronics account following the announcement between Motorola and FLEX. Could be huge potential for MWAV. 6/3/00 on SI

i'm not trying to "scare" other longs, but i hope you know MWAV is heading back to the 2s and 3s
good luck. 6/27/00 on SI

While I must admit I sold about 60-70% of my position after the run to $15 3/4 because I thought the stock was a bit ahead of itself in my 12/28/99 post I gave a 6-9 month target of $8-10) I have accumulated almost a full position again. I was hoping to finish off my position around $4-1/2 but a big buyer came in and popped it to $6. I believe Q2 will come in around $6 to $6.5 million in revenue and I would guess that earnings will be 10c-15c after tax. Keep in mind that they have over $2 million in tax loss carryforwards so the numbers are actually much better then they report (they report taxed numbers). I was glad to see the company tighten up the range of revenues they expect this year. They are looking for a 100% increase in revenues and I would guess they are looking at around 60c-70c a share in earnings as I mentioned in my 12/28/99 post when I mentioned I thought this was an $8-10 stock within 6-9 months. I was surprised to see people run the stock to $15 3/4 but this is the kind of stock that will do that due to a thin float and an exciting industry (3G Wireless).
I would think that MWAV, being a clear beneficiary of the rollout of 3G Celluar/Internet service, should peform well over the next several years. Based on comments from QCOM and IDCC there will clearly be an upgrade of all cellular towers (as well as many new towers) which is precisely where MWAV products go. The Lucent business is for power amplifier boards that go into these towers and should remain robust for years to come. 3G should be a multi-year rollout and margins should be very high as the population demands bandwidth, speed and now wireless connectivity. Additionally, I believe that MWAV is starting to see demand from many of its other customers such as Motorola, Spectrian, and others. They will need additional capacity in order to handle the increased business.
MWAV did state that they would be buying a 50,000 square foot facility to consolidate their operations. Despite some seemingly irrational posts to the contrary, I think this is a brilliant move. MWAV currently operates out of three facilities (one they own(administrative) and two (manufacturing) that they lease with leases up). Buying this facility should not cost more than $3-4 million including equipment which, with some municipal financing, will be a wash in terms of costs of their present set up. They will however gain in efficiencies and capacity which will allow them to grow the business four-fold with few pains. I believe Joe Turek has the vision to lead the company and is making the right moves. He owns 750,000 shares and has bought additional shares over the last six months.
With a $4.90 book value and virtually no debt I think MWAV is a great buy. If they put up the 60c-70c I think they will this year and $1.00-$1.20 next year with double and maybe triple digit revenue gains the stock should approach the old highs. The company is in the best position it has ever been in and has fewer share outstanding now then before. I would look for a 9-12 month target in the $18-24 range, which would give it a modest P/E, and then I would split it if I were the company in an effort to increase the float. We shall see.
6/6/00 on Yahoo

Chart
Ran Jul24 on earnings and doubled from $8 to $16. Big days are green. Big runup in March to $14 from $6 and back to $6.

Links
mwav.com

Summary
Good deal at $5, not sure at $12. I hate dependence on a few companies for revenues. Chart shows momo players are pumping this. Jingle me when it retreats to $6 as history tends to repeat. I live 40 minutes away so it tempting to make a call. Website does not work. Can’t pull up a press release. Vcall has MWAV on it but only a postponement of the CC. Volume very low. Don’t like those inventory and account receivables numbers. What should be an invisible conpany has shorts posting but no short interest. Strange indeed.

Jack



To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (605)9/2/2000 8:45:59 PM
From: Jack Hartmann  Respond to of 6912
 
W) Is TSTN a lodestone?
Rated a WATCH

Reason for DD

Passed the summer screen

Business

Turnstone Systems, Inc. is a provider of products that enable local exchange carriers to rapidly deploy and efficiently maintain DSL services. The Copper CrossConnect CX100, its first product, is currently being installed in telephone company central offices by competitive local exchange carriers to speed their deployment of DSL services. The CX100 product family enables the rapid and efficient deployment of high-speed digital services on existing copper telephone lines. Its Copper CrossConnect CX100 product family improves the efficiency of installing and managing DSL services while delivering the high levels of reliability and scalability needed in a large, complex network. The CX100 product family is the first solution designed and built specifically to enable local exchange carriers deploying DSL to automate and remotely control the installation, qualification and maintenance of copper telephone lines in a local loop.
Customers include Rhythms NetConnections (about 40% of sales), Network Access Solutions (nearly 20%), and Covad Communications (about 10%).

Competitors

Harris Corporation | Lucent | Nortel Networks per Hoovers

News
09/01 18:46 Turnstone Systems Announces Filing for Public Offering of 4,000,000 Shares Of Common Stock

08/22 08:45 Turnstone Ships More Than 10,000 Copper CrossConnect(R) CX100 Local Loop Management Platforms in First Two Year

19-Jul-00 AFTER THE CLOSE
Turnstone Sys (TSTN) 153 1/2 -23 5/8: Announces 2-1 stock split; payable on Aug 23.

13-Jul-00 09:30 -- 10:00 ET
Turnstone Sys (TSTN) 198 5/16 -2 11/16: USB Piper Jaffray initiates coverage of telecom equipment maker with a STRONG BUY rating and price target of $250

28-Feb-00 12:00 -- 13:00 ET
Turnstone Systems Inc. (TSTN) 164 +3 1/2: --Update-- Dain Rauscher Wessels initiates coverage with a STRONG BUY rating and a price target of $200; looks for TSTN to grow through increased penetration of existing accounts, new carrier account wins and new product development.


28-Feb-00 09:30 -- 10:00 ET
Turnstone Systems Inc. (TSTN) 158 -2 1/2: Robertson Stephens initiates coverage with a BUY rating; TSTN provides products that enable local exchange carriers to rapidly deploy and efficiently maintain digital subscriber line (DSL) service, enabling the automation of installation, qualification and maintenance of copper lines. Goldman Sachs, lead underwriter in TSTN's Jan. 31 IPO, initiates with a MARKET OUTPERFORM rating.

Analysts and Other
22-Aug-00 15:00 -- 16:00 ET
Turnstone Sys (TSTN) 128 7/16 +3 7/16: -- Update – Kaufman Bros initiates coverage with an ACCUMULATE rating and price target of $125; product offers both testing and loop management functionality; says that while proucts are behind the scenes in telecom networks, they are critically important as carriers rush to meet the surging demand for broadband access.

Numbers
Revs 23.1M to 41.0M Jun00
EPS 0.07 to 0.14 per briefing.com
0.15 estimated by Zacks next quarter
52-Week Low on 17-Apr-2000 $23.00
Recent Price $66.25
52-Week High on 12-July-2000 $107.00
Market Capitalization $4.05B
Shares Outstanding 61.1M
Float 11.6M
Price/Book (mrq) 33.04
Price/Earnings (ttm) 145.93
Price/Sales (ttm) 28.26
Debt/Equity (mrq) 0.00
Total Cash (mrq) $104.8M
Short Interest As of 8-Aug-2000
Shares Short 1.59M
Percent of Float 13.7%
Shares Short (Prior Month) 936.0K

Insiders
Over 50 insiders sales in 2000.
20% institutional ownership, but top two holders sold off last quarter.

Internet Posts of Note

Ben Holmes listed TSTN lockup as being expired this past July 29. Ben Holmes does a list for The Street.com every week. And the stock price did increase shortly after. Happy Trading. 8/29/00 on yahoo

I don't think there is really anything wrong with CMTN or any of the majority of DSL Equipment maker stocks except that they have all sold off to at or near absolute support levels. I'm confident that when we look back on today 6 weeks or two months from now that we will be saying, "I wish I had bought more CMNT or maybe ADTN, ISPD, NPTA, ORCT, PDYN, RBAK, TSTN or WSTL." 8/29/00 on SI

Harry, very upbeat for future growth due to the need to deploy DSL over copper and that TSTN is the only one to offer the complete solution. I think we will see some downside yet due the the fall-out from the split and the release of shares from lockup. Will be watching for a bottom as I like the company also. 8/29/00 on yahoo

I checked out TSTN and it looks like they are almost entirely dependant on one product. That is fine if sales continue strongly but NTPA appears to be a lot more diversified and less dependant on any individual product or customer. I think I'm going to stick with NTPA because earnings growth is really just starting to ramp up. The last three quarters the company went from a loss of a penny, to earnings of 5 cents and then earning of 12 cents in the last quarter. The next quarter the company is expected to earn 18 cents and then $0.80 next year and NTPA has consistently beat estimates so far and I guess I hope they will keep it up. 8/26/ on SI

EIGHT RATIONAL REASONS TO AVOID TSTN
1. We are getting close to the September/October which historically caused stock market crash.
2. 15 million shareS could be unlocked by the insiders during the next weeks. The pressure of possible insiders selling , will not let TSTN to fly during any NASDAQ rally.
3. NASDAQ is in a bear market and any earning quality issue with CSCO will cause the NASDAQ to test the May low of 3040. Since TSTN is in the networking sector, it may suffer severely by CSCO disappointment.
4. The TSTN split timing was intentionally designed by the management at 8/9 to fit into the unlocked period. The insiders will be happy to unload their shares during any possible split rally. There are a lot of examples that split rally did not happen during down market.
5. Valuation of TSTN is much higher than any other DSL maker. For example P/E of Paradyne ( PDYN) is 59 versus 141 of TSTN .
6.There are too many DSL makers out there and P/E multiple of 141 is not justified for a company in a high competition sector
7. The future is for Fiber optic makers. DSL is only a temporary solution for the next couple years.
8. The TSTN chart shows double top and possible down momentum. 8/4/00 on yahoo

Very very very impressed with the numbers TSTN put up today.
78% sequential revenue growth to $44.1 mil
Gross margins dipped slightly from 62% last Q to 58% this Q, but Im betting they had to aquire raw product at higher costs than usual to satisfy customer demand.
And hey, believe it or not it's profitable.
Will be interesting to see how the stock reacts tommorow... someone is obviously buying it if not SI readers judging from past 6 weeks. Its sitting right at 50 day moving average...
Now if this were 4 months ago it would open tommorow at $200+ based on 2 for 1 split and blowout revenue figures. This stock definately trades in huge swings, so the split hopefully will smooth it out a little bit I hope! 7/20/00 on SI

0.28 Vs Whisper of .30 and EPS of .25
I hope the whisper number is not considered !!!Great to see a 2:1 split... 7/19/00 on yahoo

The respected analysis Michael Murphy
said that we might test the May low of Nasdaq 3000 in a couple of weeks.
Call this number 301-315-0354 password: 9335
If it is true,all technology stocks are ready to go down again. He thinks the fund managers are going to start dumping stock by next week. Listen to what he has to say. 7/11/00 on yahoo

1) Its evaluation is bigger than the combination of its major customers:coad, npnt, rthm, nasc. There is no way that should happen in a normal situation.
2) Its evaluation is bigger than CMTN which should have the same or bigger growth rate than TSTN. CMTN has a revenue of 60.8M, income of 13.7 vs TSTN's R=23M and I=4M for the last quarter.
3)Its evaluation is 3 three times bigger than TLGD which has better technologies and longer operating track. The two companies has about the same revenue and income.
4) TSTN's revenue growth will slow down as it has already grapped most of the major DSL ISPs. Its products isn't really suitable for the incumbent local exchange carrier. TLGD has a better solution for the big guys. Any over-hyped stock will drop like a rock when the correction comes, as the short term traders rush into the door in quite a hurry. 7/9/00 on yahoo

Chart
$23 to 100 to 66. A virtual rollercoaster of a stock. Two big red volume days out of three.

Links
turnstone.com

Summary

Much stranger than I thought. Customer stocks are weak. Not a good sign. Insiders selling small lots now.
I just can’t get excited about the DSL sector.

Jack



To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (605)9/4/2000 12:39:01 AM
From: Jack Hartmann  Respond to of 6912
 
W)Quick and Loose on INKT
rated a WATCH

A leading provider of scalable software applications designed to significantly enhance the performance and intelligence of large-scale networks, particularly the Internet. Applications are in two broad categories: network products and portal services.

31-Aug-00 12:00 -- 13:00 ET
Akamai Tech (AKAM) 73 +1/2: Wit SoundView initiates coverage with a BUY rating; cites compelling first-mover advantages but also recognize that increasing competition from other networks powered by Inktomi (INKT) and Cisco (CSCO) will add to uncertainty in the short-term.

30-Aug-00 10:00 -- 11:00 ET
Inktomi (INKT) 124 1/4 +5 1/16: -- Update -- Lehman Brothers initiates coverage of software applications developer with a BUY rating and sets price target of $150.

30-Aug-00 BEFORE THE OPEN
Inktomi (INKT) 119 3/16: First Union Securities upgrades to BUY from MARKET PERFORM rating based on expectations that the company will show improving momentum in the rapidly growing enterprise caching segment; establishes a 12-month price target of $145.

17-Aug-00 09:30 -- 10:00 ET
Inktomi (INKT) 103 3/4 -2 9/16: Announced an extension of their alliance with Vignette (VIGN) on the V/5 eBusiness Application Platform. The joint solution automates entry into INKT's commerce infrastructure platform enabling customers to instantly tap into their portal network and leverage opportunities for online sales; see press release.

14-Aug-00 11:00 -- 12:00 ET
Inktomi (INKT) 106 +1 7/16: Thomas Weisel reiterates STRONG BUY rating; firm views recent weakness as a buying opportunity; cites strong demand for company's network product suite and anticipates significant new content distribution customer announcements; additionally expect company to make acquisitions that will grow its base of software offerings; based on these catalysts there is potential upside to current estimates of $70.7 mln revs and $0.05 EPS for September.

20-Jul-00 AFTER THE CLOSE
Inktomi (INKT) 129 7/16 +6 3/8: Reports Q3 earnings of $0.04 a share, $0.02 better than the First Call consensus of $0.02; revenues totaled $61.5 million, a 202% gain over revenues of $20.3 million for the comparable quarter in the last year and a 30% sequential increase over the prior quarter; see press release.

26-Jun-00 15:00 -- 16:00 ET
Inktomi (INKT) 116 5/8 -23 7/16: -- Update -- CIBC Wrld Mkts reiterates STRONG BUY rating and price target of $150; other reiterations from afternoon call include STRONG BUYS on MHP, TRB and HOLD on FTU.

26-Jun-00 15:00 -- 16:00 ET
Inktomi (INKT) 116 1/16 -24: -- Update -- Merrill Lynch reiterates NT BUY/LT BUY saying the market over-reacted to Yahoo's (YHOO) decision not to renew its search contract with INKT; YHOO accounts for less than 2% of INKT revenues and was expected to decline throughout the year as INKT's search revenue mix shifted towards enterprise search.

26-Jun-00 BEFORE THE OPEN
Yahoo! (YHOO) 125 5/16: -- Update -- Company unveils new Corporate Yahoo! service for the enterprise market; among vendors selected for the new portal are: TIBCO (TIBX), Inktomi (INKT), Hewlett-Packard (HWP), Citrix (CTXS), Netegrity (NETE), and Critical Path (CPTH); see press release.

26-Jun-00 BEFORE THE OPEN
Inktomi (INKT) 140 3/8: Trading down sharply pre-market as company apparently loses position as default search engine on Yahoo! (YHOO) to Google; company's search engine technology is selected for a new Yahoo! corporate service, however.

22-Jun-00 10:00 -- 11:00 ET
Inktomi (INKT) 152 7/8 +5 9/16: Company announces the launch of its search operations in Korea; the search engine will be hosted by one of Korea's premier provider of Internet services will provide customers with localized Korean content within a customizable search platform; see press release.

08-Jun-00 BEFORE THE OPEN
Inktomi (INKT) 128 13/16: Company announces they will purchase Ultraseek Corp., a subsidiary of Go.com (GO), which is a subsidiary of Disney (DIS). The purchase price will be $344.7 mln, $3.5 mln in cash and the remaining $341.2 mln in INKT stock. Ultraseek provides customized navigation software for corporate intranet and extranet sites to businesses; see press release.

04-May-00 BEFORE THE OPEN
Inktomi (INKT) 145 3/16: Announced strategic partnerships with NOK and DCLK: the agreement with NOK will enable the delivery of next-generation wireless data services and applications to both current and Third Generation networks; the agreement with DCLKoffers an integrated solution for matching targeted banner advertising to keyword search results through DCLK's Search category.

18-Apr-00 AFTER THE CLOSE
Inktomi (INKT) 116 +24: Reports Q2 earnings of $0.01 a share, $0.03 above the First Call consensus of ($0.02), vs year-ago loss of $0.07; revenues rose 211% to $47.3 mln; see press release.

04-Apr-00 AFTER THE CLOSE
Oracle Corp (ORCL) 75 15/16 -15/16: Developer of software for information management announces that it will enter the Internet caching market next month; Inktomi (INKT) shares slip 2 pts in after hours on the news....

16-Mar-00 14:00 -- 15:00 ET
Inktomi (INKT) 191 1/4 -4 5/8: Thomas Weisel reiterates STRONG BUY rating after the company announced yesterday a broad wireless initiative with an array of new business partners that touches each segment of the Company’s business (shopping, search, caching). Initiative highlights the company’s ability to leverage a core competence in providing highly scalable technology to enable the distribution of highly relevant, differentiated content and commerce services to wireless subscribers.

26-Jun-00 09:47 ET
Market Movers : Inktomi (INKT -23 3/8) gaps lower on Yahoo! news... Internet professional services company Scient (SCNT -6) under pressure following downgrade based on news that two of company's customers have filed for bankruptcy.

15-Feb-00 07:58 ET
Inktomi Corp (INKT) 114: Robertson Stephens upgrades from LT ATTRACTIVE to BUY; Inktomi dominates the search engine business; it is also an established and growing leader in network and enterprise caching; and it is pursuing an emerging opportunity in e-shopping enablement; FY 2000 est for revs is now $178.6 million and EPS is estimated at $(0.02).

EPS (0.09) to (0.02) to (0.01) to 0.04 per briefing
REV 19.6 to 26.2 to 36.1 to 47.3 to 61.5

Chart: triple bottom around $100. Broke out of a triangle to upside this month. 10/50/200 stack developing.

52-Week Low on 27-Oct-1999 $46.907
Recent Price $130.75
52-Week High on 20-Mar-2000 $241.50
Market Capitalization $14.9B
Shares Outstanding 114.0M
Float 86.7M
Price/Book (mrq) 30.13
Price/Earnings N/A
Price/Sales (ttm) 87.33
Debt/Equity (mrq) 0.02
Total Cash (mrq) $272.2M
Short Interest
As of 8-Aug-2000
Shares Short 2.58M
Percent of Float 3.0%
Insider: 24%
· Over the last 6 months:
· 20 insider sells; 810.0K shares
(2.9% of insider shares)
· Institutional: 46% (61% of float)
(523 institutions)
· Net Inst. Buying: 1.52M shares (+2.80%)
(prior quarter to latest quarter)

Summary
I don't like the massive insider selling, but institutions don't seem to mind. Shares priced to perfection but this company has 30% q2q growth for four quarters. Would have like to get in around $110, but this one will rocket if the nasdaq gets on fire. One to sleep on.

Jack



To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (605)9/13/2000 8:52:18 PM
From: Mike E.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6912
 
DITC probably deserves a WATCH as a potential fiber play that has been "left behind".
Probably has a stigma attached to it because it's profitable. <sigh>

I noticed it was in your scans back in August but failed on the EPS improvement test.
I don't think the last quarter was available at the time of your scan and it looks to
be back on the right track. I have picked up a partial position. Chart is still
messy, but could be near a double bottom:

timely.com

Latest data from Market Guide:

Ditech Communications Ticker: DITC Page 1 of 10
Complete Financials: July 2000 Exchange NASD
FY END APR
ISSUE DATA (09/01/00) PER SHARE DATA RATIOS
Price $ 59.25 EPS (TTM) $ 1.41 P/E (TTM) 42.14
52W High $ 140.19 Div. Rate $ 0.00 Yield 0.00 %
52W Low $ 24.19 Book Value $ 8.92 Price/Book 6.64
Shrs Out 28.49 Mil Cash $ 4.41 ROE (TTM) 35.12 %
Float 16.50 Mil Rev (TTM) $ 5.21 ROA (TTM) 31.05 %
Mon. Vol 19.38 Mil Curr. Ratio 4.43
Beta NA LT Dbt/Eqty 0.00
BRIEF: Ditech Communications designs, develops and markets
echo cancellation equipment and equipment that enables and
facilitates communications over fiber optic networks. For
the 3 months ended 7/31/00, revenues totalled 43.5M, up
from $9.8M. Net income applic. to Common totalled $11.7M,
up from $940K. Results reflect the continued strong sales
drive of the Company's leading-edge Broadband Echo
Canceller and increased gross margin based on sales growth.



Copyright (c) 2000, Market Guide Inc., All rights reserved (more)

Ditech Communications QUARTERLY SUMMARY Page 2 of 10
HISTORICAL QUARTERLY RESULTS(Thousands of U.S. Dollars)
REVENUE 1998 1999 2000 2001
1st Qtr JUL 2,708 5,124 9,771 43,529
2nd Qtr OCT 2,564 5,814 26,027
3rd Qtr JAN 3,415 7,087 34,382
4th Qtr APR 3,639 7,339 46,766
EPS (U.S. Dollars per share)
1st Qtr JUL -0.045 -0.055 0.040 0.390
2nd Qtr OCT -0.050 -0.045 0.310
3rd Qtr JAN -0.055 -0.030 0.410
4th Qtr APR -0.075 -0.010 0.300

2/00, 2-for-1 stock split. All Series B Preferred converted
into Common and Series A Preferred redeemed upon completion
of IPO.

DIVIDENDS EMPLOYEES
Last Dividend Decl. $ NA # Employees 149
Last Div Ex-Date NA Sales/Employee (TTM) 1,011,436
Last Div Pay Date NA Net. Income/Empl.(TTM) 273,161
Copyright (c) 2000, Market Guide Inc., All rights reserved (more)

Ditech Communications COMPANY COMPARISON Page 3 of 10
TO THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND S&P 500 AGGREGATES
VALUATION RATIOS: COMPANY INDUSTRY S&P 500
P/E Ratio 42.14 41.68 35.61
Dividend Yield 0.00 0.73 1.09
Price to Tangible Book 6.64 14.20 13.76
Price to Book 6.64 8.72 9.61
Price to Free Cash Flow NA 55.02 41.88
GROWTH STATISTICS:
3 Yr Rev Growth 102.58 31.41 17.85
3 Yr EPS Growth 195.28 20.34 18.37
3 Yr Div Growth NM 16.63 11.24
Reinvestment Rate 100.00 84.76 76.77
PROFITABILITY RATIOS:
Net Profit Margin 27.01 7.86 12.25
Return on Equity 35.12 10.62 20.95
Interest Coverage 8,296.63 4.55 9.39
FINANCIAL STRENGTH RATIOS:
Current Ratio 4.43 2.09 1.72
LT Debt to Equity 0.00 0.62 0.70
Total Debt to Equity 0.02 0.78 0.91
Copyright (c) 2000, Market Guide Inc., All rights reserved (more)

Ditech Communications TRADING & PRICE PERFORMANCE Page 4 of 10
INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP INSIDER TRADING (Prev. 6 months)
% Shares Out. Owned 78.98 % Net Insider Trades -14
# of Institutions 196 # Buy Transactions 0
Total Shs Held 22.505 Mil # Sell Transactions 14
3 Mo. Net Purch. 2.991 Mil Net Shares Bought -1.057 Mil
3 Mo. Shs Purch. 7.001 Mil # Shares Bought 0.000 Mil
3 Mo. Shs Sold 4.010 Mil # Shares Sold 1.057 Mil

4 Week Price % Change 13.4% 4 Week Rel. Price % Change 9.1%
13 Week Price % Change -33.9% 13 Week Rel. Price % Change -35.8%
26 Week Price % Change -53.5% 26 Week Rel. Price % Change -56.9%
52 Week Price % Change 56.3% 52 Week Rel. Price % Change 39.5%
YTD Week Price % Change 26.7% YTD Week Rel. Price % Change 22.5%

SHORT INTEREST
Current month 0.888 Mil
Previous month 1.014 Mil
Avg Daily Vol. 0.857 Mil

MARKET MAKERS: HMQT SHWD PENN RSSF HRZG MHMY
Copyright (c) 2000, Market Guide Inc., All rights reserved (more)

Ditech Communications EQUITY, OFFICERS & ADDRESS Page 5 of 10
Common Stock $.0005 Par, 7/00, 50M auth., 28,494,003 issd.
Insiders control approx. 19%, Fidelity Investments owns
13%, Pilgrim Baxter & Associates owns 10%. IPO 6/9/99, 3M
shares @ $11 by Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown (DBAB). PO 10/99,
2.25M shs (1M by Co.) @ $51.50 by DBAB.


OFFICERS: Timothy K. Montgomery, CEO/Pres., Pong C. Lim,
Chmn., Toni M. Bellin, VP, William J. Tamblyn, VP/CFO.
TRANSFER AGENT: Norwest Bank Minnesota N.A. Company
reincorporated 1999 in DE. Direct inquiries to: Director
of Investor Relations.
ADDRESS & PHONE NUMBERS
Ditech Communications
825 E. Middlefield Road
Mountain View, CA 94043
PHONE: (650) 623-1300
FAX: (650) 564-9599


Copyright (c) 2000, Market Guide Inc., All rights reserved (more)

Ditech Communications ANNUAL INCOME STATEMENT Page 6 of 10
(Thousands of U.S. Dollars)
12M 04/30/97 12M 04/30/98 12M 04/30/99 12M 04/30/00
Revenue 14,066 12,326 25,364 116,946
Total Revenue 14,066 12,326 25,364 116,946
Cost of Good Sold 6,790 5,651 11,858 34,913
Sales/Marketing 1,521 2,405 5,759 9,411
Research/Development 1,072 2,367 3,860 8,559
General/Admin. 714 1,279 2,399 4,296
Purchased R&D 0 0 0 8,684
Amort. of Goodwill 0 0 0 1,860
Total Expenses 10,097 11,702 23,876 67,723
Operating Income 3,969 624 1,488 49,223








Copyright (c) 2000, Market Guide Inc., All rights reserved (more)

Ditech Communications ANNUAL INCOME STATEMENT Page 7 of 10
(Thousands of U.S. Dollars)
12M 04/30/97 12M 04/30/98 12M 04/30/99 12M 04/30/00
Operating Income 3,969 624 1,488 49,223
Interest Expense -125 -768 -702 -180
Other, Net 21 175 202 1,725
Income Before Taxes 3,865 31 988 50,768
Income Taxes 1,522 24 413 20,765
Income After Taxes 2,343 7 575 30,003
Accretion of Pfrd. -187 -1,374 -1,497 -99
Pri/Bas EPS Ex. XOrd 0.044 -0.223 -0.129 1.272
Discontinued Ops. -2,751 0 0 0
Gain on Disposal 2,843 0 0 0
Pri/Bas EPS In. XOrd 0.045 -0.223 -0.129 1.272
Primary/Basic Avg Sh 49,544.00 6,122.00 7,132.00 23,505.00
Common Dividends/Shr 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000





Copyright (c) 2000, Market Guide Inc., All rights reserved (more)

Ditech Communications SELECTED INCOME STATEMENT Page 8 of 10
(Thousands of U.S. Dollars)
QUARTERS YEAR TO DATE
3M 07/31/99 3M 07/31/00 3M 07/31/99 3M 07/31/00
Revenue 9,771 43,529 9,771 43,529
Operating Expenses 7,873 24,481 7,873 24,481
Operating Income 1,898 19,048 1,898 19,048
Non-Operating Income 63 1,149 63 1,149
Non-Operating Expenses -172 0 -172 0
Income Before Taxes 1,789 20,197 1,789 20,197
Income Taxes 750 8,460 750 8,460
Adjustments to Income -99 0 -99 0
Inc. for Primary EPS 940 11,737 940 11,737
Pri/Bas EPS Ex. XOrd 0.056 0.426 0.056 0.426
Disc Opns + Xord Items 0 0 0 0
Pri/Bas EPS In. XOrd 0.056 0.426 0.056 0.426
Primary/Basic Avg Sh 16,718.00 27,582.00 16,718.00 27,582.00
Dilutd EPS Excl XOrd 0.042 0.390 0.042 0.390
Dilutd EPS Incl XOrd 0.042 0.390 0.042 0.390
Common Dividends/Shr 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Copyright (c) 2000, Market Guide Inc., All rights reserved (more)

Ditech Communications SELECTED BALANCE SHEET Page 9 of 10
(Thousands of U.S. Dollars)
YEAR ENDING QUARTER ENDING
04/30/99 04/30/00 07/31/99 07/31/00
Cash & ST Investments 3,114 88,616 8,126 121,689
Receivables 3,068 21,761 3,598 19,978
Total Current Assets 11,451 119,164 17,280 152,611
LT Investments 0 0 0 0
Fixed Assets 1,538 2,680 1,706 4,936
Total Assets 14,330 165,152 22,688 280,543
Accounts Payable 2,559 5,201 2,306 7,463
ST Debt & Curr LTD 1,186 55 63 4,250
Total Current Liab. 6,147 11,558 5,269 34,455
LT Debt & Cap Leases 6,264 21 60 12
Total Liabilities 12,415 11,579 5,343 34,467
Preferred Stock 25,258 0 0 0
Common/Paid In Capital 3,090 171,147 43,095 252,326
Retained Earnings -25,204 4,363 -24,603 16,100
Total Equity 1,915 153,573 17,345 246,076
Shares Outstanding 9,188 28,274 24,488 27,582

Copyright (c) 2000, Market Guide Inc., All rights reserved (more)

Ditech Communications SELECTED STMT OF CASH FLOWS Page 10 of 10
INDIRECT METHOD (Thousands of U.S. Dollars)
ANNUAL YEAR TO DATE
12M 04/30/99 12M 04/30/00 3M 07/31/99 0M 07/31/00
Net Income 575 30,003 1,039 0
Depreciation & Amort. 573 5,916 432 0
Non Cash Items -85 13,098 -121 0
Total Operating CF 715 34,268 909 0
Capital Expenditures -698 -1,968 -288 0
Total Investing CF -1,332 -5,273 -3,297 0
Dividends Paid 0 0 0 0
Sale (Purch.) of Stock 909 63,881 14,727 0
Net Borrowings -611 -7,374 -7,327 0
Total Financing CF 298 56,507 7,400 0
Exchange Rate Effect 0 0 0 0
Net Change In Cash -319 85,502 5,012 0
Oper CF-Cap Exp-Div Pd 17 32,300 621 0




Copyright (c) 2000, Market Guide Inc., All rights reserved



To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (605)10/18/2000 8:08:14 AM
From: Jack Hartmann  Respond to of 6912
 
The more I look at this summer screen the more JNPR stands out. Their CC has strongest growth going forward, but also highest PE too. But they are selling a product that is eating CSCOs lunch and should continue to do so. $140 entry was based on spring lows but two monster quarters back to back have shown huge jumps in revs and earnings. Marketcap of 72B is high, but JNPR is growing 50% sequentially. Will add some at the open. Sell RFMD at open. $15 might be a deal. CC was bleak and unexpected. Alot of ifs in the wireless sector.
Jack