We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Blue Chip Gold Stocks HM, NEM, ASA, ABX, PDG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gold$10k who wrote (48083)1/21/2015 12:15:20 PM
From: dara  Respond to of 48092
Thx! They look rather nice. Now is this the bottom or a bear market rally? Where is that crystal ball?!?

To: gold$10k who wrote (48083)9/12/2015 12:00:47 AM
From: Greg from Edmonton  Respond to of 48092
Wow, this thread is D-E-D dead. Some interesting items in my calendar this month that I have marked as they coincide on market cycle theory. First up marks the Shemitah Year-End on Sunday, September 13. Not sure what all that means but it is significant to some. There have been rumblings that this fall and September in particular could be a significant turning point.

I have marked an upcoming date in my calendar regarding an article about Martin Armstrong's Economic Pi Cycle and Confidence Model (ref. URL is as follows, article is from 2009 October 9-10):

3141 days (?) apart from these dates:
1998 July 20 (S&P High prior to LTCM bust)
2007 Feb 23 turn prior to Feb 27 market dip and subsequent 2-year bear market

Next interval (as I have marked in my calendar, could be off on the count) is 2015 September 29.

Here is an amazing article on Martin Armstrong's "The Secret Cycle":

Also interesting is an article from 2006 which mentions 2007 February 27 as a turn date, and as I listed above that date marked a significant market dip:

While I do not firmly believe in cycle theory, the upcoming forecasted turning point dates bear watching with some interest.

I honestly used to pay some attention to what Martin Armstrong said but have since regarded him as a bit of a quack that is rather high on himself. In cycle terms I am more likely to listen to what Charles Nenner is saying when I happen to come across his work.