Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Minera IRL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mark_ikn who wrote (1010)	11/24/2021 12:14:23 AM
From: Kiwi Pom	2 Recommendations Recommended By andrewlong Sredna5 Respond to of 1341

Exactly In my complaint to RTZ I will be insisting not how they vote in the MIRL AGM, but that they do vote and do not take the route of abstention. If they are really serious about their ESG obligiations, particularly the G, there is no way they can not take a position on the conduct of this board of directors. I for one will ensure a fuss is raised if they do not vote - how they cast their vote is up to their business ethics.

To: mark_ikn who wrote (1010)	11/24/2021 12:23:22 AM
From: andrewlong	Respond to of 1341

Well, here we go again, the Board of Directors are not doing their job. I would of thought that the Board/Company would have postponed the Annual Meeting until their investigation was completed. As a shareholder I may have not liked that decision but ……… I think the Board wants the shareholders to vote against the re election of Benavides and Hema. And then let the new board clean up the mess by dismissing the CEO. OR Does the current Board feel or even think they have enough votes to keep the status quo. Besides the CS share holdings and I am sure many other dissatisfied holders will vote Benavides off as Director. I hate to suggest that we all write/emails to MIRL hot line, to OSC, to Rio Tinto, etc In the case Rio Tinto, if the meeting goes ahead as is, they may never see a return on their 44 million shares. And that would be applicable to us as well. Any thoughts from you as to how we can put pressure on the Board? andrewlong P.S. I just saw the wise post by Kiwi Pom.