SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (210644)7/13/2021 4:03:16 PM
From: Force Majeure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 211244
 
OT
Yeah, you caught a big mistake.

Not trying to be a grammar nazi, just got confused by the statement.

.
Admittedly, I haven't heard of the book, so I'll have to check it out. By and large, most (if not all) costs, including taxes, are passed along to the consumer. So it seems to me raising corporate taxes will force a corporation to react in one or several ways:

* raise prices on goods & services and punish customers, which could result in selling less products and less revenues

* absorb the costs and pass it along to investors thru reduced eps and/or dividend payouts in some cases

* absorb the costs and punish your work force thru reduced compensation (i.e. wages, raises and profit sharing in some cases) as well as 3rd party developers; and it also threatens retention of good talent

* or a combo of some or all of the above

Any of these actions will affect investors (as stated not all are wealthy; most are hard working middle class), and most certainly the little guy (whether consumers or employees.) So I don't see how raising taxes or cutting into executive compensation benefits the low and middle class or anyone for that matter. It merely serves to punish the wrong target(s).