We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Speculating in Takeover Targets -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: robert b furman who wrote (5603)10/30/2019 12:06:24 PM
From: richardred  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6545
Hi Bob: Just my guess FWIW, but IMO I'd think they keep it? The American love affair with TRUCKS and you should know. :+ ) Given the price of the new ones. I'm guessing profit Margins in trucks must be among the best in the industry? I'm guessing RAM trucks are lagging Ford & GM? Having it as a stand alone with out the backing of a corporate parent IMO weakens the brand. On your side of a hypothetical spin- off. A improve the balance sheet & Scale of small cars as you've stated. To many layers of corporate management in the Ram brand likely leaves the brand less adaptive to quicker change. C/F would still have the Jeep line, a coveted brand and most likely more profitable than Ram. The Ferrari spin -off seems to have went well. This is more your expertise, so maybe I'm off the mark. I'm sure you remember like myself, when AMC owned Jeep. and that weird car the Pacer. Related Thought- It also seems most of the EV are smaller cars. Maybe an Advantage for the European market, and Future US market?


I sure miss my Silverado truck. Yeah, I could afford a new one, but I'm kind of frugal when it comes to buying new vehicles these days.

Things didn't seem to work out to well when Daimler owed Chrysler.

Daimler CEO says there are no plans to pursue a merger or spin-off