Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (6837)	12/11/2006 9:09:03 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 6843

Shouldn't this conversation be on Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic Subject 53036 Not on AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only!

To: Petz who wrote (6837)	12/22/2006 3:49:29 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Respond to of 6843

Petz As I am unable to post a reply on the SI board I used this instead Here's one example of your use of chipsets to explain Intel's apparently low yields. The discussion continued for several more iterations: Message 17415851 You had to go back 4.5 years to find a post that said nothing of the kind. It simply says that the product mix is too complex to make any determination. The point being that no matter how well intentioned, attempts to estimate fab output or yields are not going to be of much use. This is your proof that we are "constantly claiming chipsets to explain low yields"? One 4.5 year old post? This is really lame Petz. You were caught in a lie and you compound it trying to wiggle out. An honest person would just acknowledge they misspoke and that would be the end of it.