Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (88511)	3/31/2003 10:01:41 PM
From: broadstbull	Respond to of 281500

<<<1) Saddam's military is better than the Vietcong.>>> You're kidding, right? Viet Cong never surrendered in mass groups of 2,000 like Saddam's. They were far more highly motivated. Unlike the Iraqis they were impossible to demoralize. Our enemies in Viet Nam were some of the best soldiers to fight in this century. <<<In Vietnam, we had the assistance of the ARVN,>>> Again, you're kidding, right? The Brits helping us right now are 10 times more committed and effective than any Arvin unit ever was.

To: Bilow who wrote (88511)	3/31/2003 10:42:55 PM
From: ThirdEye	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Saddam's military is better than the Vietcong. Way far from proving that yet.

To: Bilow who wrote (88511)	3/31/2003 11:05:10 PM
From: Ilaine	Respond to of 281500

He's baaack. No insight whatsoever. No humility whatsoever. Just - here's Carl and FY if you have any problems with that. I've thought about it long and hard. If I am going to stand by my own integrity, a man who shits on others for no reason and won't apologize when he's wrong deserves banishment, but if the moderator won't banish him, the best I can do is permanent Ignore. Public messages to Bilow, check. Public messages from Bilow, check. Private messages from Bilow, check. Forever gone, check.