We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Buffettology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (1685)7/17/1999 12:35:00 AM
From: Shane M  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4661

I agree that the the numbers on MCY look very good relative to competitors. California I guess was the deal breaker. These things come and go though. Occassionally everybody wants to be in a given state for the growth prospects, and then something happens that makes everybody wish they weren't there. And then later everybody wants back in for some other reason.

At my company we were running from hurricane exposure in the years following hurricane Andrew, and still are to a degree. But the pendulum is perceptively swinging back to freeing up writing in CAT areas, despite the fact that it's actuarially still far from being profitable on a normalized basis. In some areas the normalized CAT loss _alone_ is sufficient to cause underwriting losses. i.e. Before we have the first XCAT claim we are losing money becuase the expected CAT losses are so high. When there's major pressure to grow the top line companies will do unpredictable things.