SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Gold/Mining/EnergyInventus Mining Corp - IVS


Previous 10 Next 10 
From: molee9/12/2019 12:45:09 PM
   of 728
 
INVENTUS FINDS MULTIPLE NEW GOLD-COPPER SHOWINGS ON ITS SUDBURY 2.0 PROPERTY


static1.squarespace.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: molee10/14/2019 11:19:15 AM
1 Recommendation   of 728
 
If you haven't seen this on Stockhouse , an "explanation" per se ...

The problem is milling

Inventus is in limbo until they have a reasonable cost-effective solution to process their ore.

Inventus' ore has pyrite in it which is acid-generating. As such the Black Fox Mill can't take the ore. They took the first 1,000 tonne bulk sample as a favor. We need a gravity and flotation circuit in place to reduce the sulfide. The testing Inventus did earlier (see July 9, 2019 PR) resulted in <.05% sulfide which is not acid producing. Unfortunately, Black Fox doesn't have a gravity and flotation circuit in place. Other mills with the circuit are either too far away to ship ore or are unreasonably expensive. The company is working with the Black Fox Mill to come up with a solution. Given McEwen's interest in Inventus, hopefully they can come up with a solution.

It's not that the company is doing anything wrong, they're in a bind that they're trying to work through. Unfortunately, shareholders have to wait until this problem is resolved.
The reason is both cost and tailings. The black fox mill (BFM) has net neutral tailings and since our ore has pyrite in it, it would be acid generating. They took the 1st 1,000 tonne bulk sample as a favor. Many deposits are acid generating so its not a problem. We could still use the BFM, however, they are concerned about the sulfide and would like to have a gravity and flotation circuit in place. We did testing (see press release july 9th 2019) and we have 0.05% sulfide in the ore after gravity plus flotation so it would not be acid generating after that type of mill circuit. We are currently working on a solution with the BFM to have a gravity + flotation circuit in place.

We have been looking for other mills in the mean time that have a gravity + flotation circuit already in place, however, they have been unreasonably priced or to far to ship our ore too. We our still looking for other mills in the area that are under capacity and have a few other options we have engaged. Hope this answers your question

Read more at stockhouse.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: molee who wrote (615)10/15/2019 2:11:17 PM
From: rhino1
   of 728
 
Thks. I had just posed a few questions to management and this answered them. Hopefully they are able to work something out in a timely manner.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: molee who wrote (615)10/15/2019 6:45:24 PM
From: StemuliteWorks
   of 728
 
For the record, I do not believe this. eom

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: StemuliteWorks who wrote (617)10/15/2019 7:45:59 PM
From: rhino1
   of 728
 
Interesting response, care to elaborate as to what & why? Pm if you prefer.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: rhino1 who wrote (616)10/18/2019 1:08:02 AM
From: molee
   of 728
 
Inventus website blog has been updated .... inventusmining.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


From: StemuliteWorks10/18/2019 1:12:56 PM
   of 728
 
But I am a buyer this morning......

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: molee who wrote (619)10/21/2019 2:56:35 PM
From: JW@KSC
1 Recommendation   of 728
 
Thanks for the Blog Link molee ! The story began I.8 Billion Years ago: Looking over a few Inventus PDF documents I found the following statement on the last page of a PFF .

"The Laundry Lake Breccia Belt (LLBB)
Explore in greater detail to discover quartz diorite with sulfide mineralization similar to the Frood-Stobie deposit. Continue mapping and extending the LLBB unit along strike."

google.com

Tried checking
whymark.squarespace.com and the acct. Does not exist, I checked here because :

Wesley Whymark Inventus
Chief GeologistMr. Whymark is a Professional Geoscientist very knowledgeable in the study and exploration of Witwatersrand-type paleoplacer gold deposits. He has authored a scientific paper on the subject of paleoplacer gold with a world-renowned geoscientist that was published in the Ore Geology Reviews Journal. He has a Honours B.Sc. degree in Geology from Laurentian University, Sudbury and is currently completing a Ph.D. on the Pardo Paleoplacer gold project at the University of Cape Town, South Africa in conjunction with the University of Würzburg, Germany. For more: ca.linkedin.com

I've been fascinated by the Temagami Magnetic Anomaly (being drilled by Canadian Continental) since first investing in Inventus just shortly after McEwen bought in. When Inventus purchased an investment in Canadian Continental (which was drilling Temagami, my interest in Temagami Grew Proportionately.

drive.google.com

I decided to Look up Frood- Sobieski Deposit to see the similarities between Temagami and Frood-Stobie Deposit.

The Discovery of Frood-Stobie Mine (Sudbury)

mindat.org

In depth on Frood-Sobie :
ontarioexplorations101.com


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: JW@KSC10/21/2019 3:00:49 PM
   of 728
 
Sudbury & Temagami

Really a great video on both.

drive.google.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: molee who wrote (611)10/28/2019 12:53:39 PM
From: molee
   of 728
 
Today's trading in GNGXF does not make me feel warm and fuzzy inside . You ?

TimePriceVolumeMarket
12:16:180.061000OTO
12:16:170.0622000OTO
12:16:170.061000OTO
12:16:170.061000OTO
12:16:170.062000OTO
12:16:170.061000OTO
12:16:170.061000OTO
12:16:170.064000OTO
12:16:170.062000OTO
12:16:170.061000OTO
11:16:280.062000OTO
11:16:280.068000OTO
11:16:280.061000OTO
11:16:280.064000OTO
11:16:280.06210000OTO
11:16:280.0621000OTO
11:16:280.0623000OTO
11:16:280.0624000OTO
10:12:070.0620000OTO

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)
Previous 10 Next 10