SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Gold/Mining/EnergyInventus Mining Corp - IVS


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: StemuliteWorks who wrote (7)4/21/2016 1:37:54 PM
From: StemuliteWorks
   of 728
 
Poll Results.....2 yea.....2 ney for dead even split! HaHaHa, wish we could have gotten some more participants but thanks anyway to those that voted!

I have been traveling so have not seen my proxy materials yet, looking forward to reading them. SHM Cinco de Mayo I understand.....Should get some news around then...

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: StemuliteWorks who wrote (46)4/21/2016 3:41:26 PM
From: JW@KSC
   of 728
 
On the Consolidation - I guess we find ourselves on opposite sides of the Fence on this Issue StemuliteWorks.

No I don't want to see consolidation. Yes I think it will take place.

Do I want to see consolidation? No, in less it would be in the best interests of the Company.

No matter how much you own. In my case especially not considering I based my Purchase on the Stock on at least going to $0.50 with the amount of shares I Purchased. I would like to see a return a on capital in the $???,000 range. Perhaps you can figure out the least amount I own. It may be greater than the minimum sum of the equation, but certainly not less.

So No, I don't want to see the Consolidation happen. But Que Sera Sera.

IMO whatever the 3 Largest Shareholders decide will happen will happen as they hold appox. 31%. and as far as I know, Institution(s) only own 1.38 M shares. See Note, there maybe other Large shareholders who held their shares.

NOTE: There are 3.7 Millions shares That are not part of the 31% mentioned that were done in a transaction in 2009 and had a 4 month holding Period. Whether this Party held those shares or not is an unknown.

NOTE: Also there are another Appox. 12M shares owned by 3 parties In 2011 (last date of record I have) by former Ginguro Associates or investors. Whether these Parties held those shares or not is an unknown.

a) Is there a retail Investor(s) who own enough where their vote might have a huge impact Vote?
b) Will more than 20% of retail investors Vote for Consolidation?
c) Will a large Percentage of Retail Investors that Get the Proxy bother Voting at all, thus changing the amount of shares Voted. Thus giving the Large Shareholders an advantage?
d) Will it be determined by the Board after the shareholder meeting not to do a Consolidation?
e) ????
f) ????

The best one can do is make sure you vote and say Que Sera Sera.

A lot of my basis for seeing the Consolidation happening is based on:

Not knowing ahead of time of the last Private Placement those participating went in thinking a consolidation was likely, Given the share Price at the time. Also in order to gain more attention by Financial entities the share price needs to be higher (Granted Share Price has improved since the last PP) .

Also the less shares the better from some people's stand point. Not a factor, although Ian Ball for one likes to see a small Share Structure for Abitibi showing only some 10 Million Shares Outstanding. Granted IVS is not the same with RZZ having a share price of $4.18 up from $3.00 in February.

In the PR I found (which is Below) it sound like the IVS wants the Consolidation to happen.

Just a couple of Quotes:

There are currently 85,183,806 Common Shares issued and outstanding. Upon the Consolidation becoming effective, it is expected there will be approximately 42,591,903 post-consolidation Common Shares in the capital of the Corporation issued and outstanding on a non-diluted basis
Those words could be interpreted a few ways.
1. Yes if the consolidation takes place, there would be 42.6 Million shares.
2. We expect the company will have 42.6 M shares post-consolidation.

Taken in context with the next quote each person must choose 1. Or 2. For themselves.
The board of directors of Inventus (the 'Board') has concluded that the Consolidation would be in the best interests of the Shareholders as it could lead to increased interest by a wider audience of potential investors and could better position the Corporation to obtain financing and pursue acquisition opportunities.
Granted it does also say:

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board may determine not to implement the Consolidation at any time after the Meeting and after receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, but prior to the issuance of a certificate of amendment, without further action on the part of the Shareholder.




04/12/2016 - Inventus Mining : Announces Proposed Consolidation


Disclaimer - I own shares in IVS.V
The Opinions and Comments are those of my own.
Do Your own Due Diligence, the make Investment Choices Based on your own Study.
Good Luck at the Rigged Market Tables.
JW




Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: JW@KSC who wrote (47)4/21/2016 11:20:27 PM
From: JW@KSC
   of 728
 
* Interrelationships - Part 2

There is another Anomaly just about 20 miles East of Pardo. It called the Temagami Magnetic Anomaly .

The Temagami Magnetic Anomaly is egg shaped, 36 mii long and 12 mi wide. The central section has the greatest amplitude and an EW strike.

The first Dot is Sudbury, the second Dot is Pardo, the third dot is the Temagami Magnetic Anomaly

The western portion appears smoother in character while the eastern section is long and narrow. With an areal extent of 50 x 15 km, the Temagami Magnetic Anomaly reaches a magnitude of approximately 10,000 nanoteslas ( No thats not something Elon Musk is working on. Grin) making it one of the largest positive anomalies in North America. It was discovered by a magnetic survey and a gravity survey.

The Temagami Magnetic Anomaly has striking similarities to the nearby Sudbury Basin, which is one of the richest mining areas in the world. Its magnetic anomalies are very similar to the Sudbury Basin and so it could be a second metal-rich impact crater.



Now I'm sure you're saying Great info JW, but what the hell has that got on do with anything related to ISV ?

Does ANYONE have any Idea what this relationship might be?

Lab? Erie? StemuliteWorks? Molee? Bostma?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


From: JW@KSC4/21/2016 11:55:58 PM
   of 728
 
Votes Cast : 1
What is the "Best" Gold Exploration Tool that Inventus has at Pardo.
Gold Pan
 
1
GPS like a Garmin GPSMAP 64s
 
0
Magnetic Susceptibility Meter
 
0
Geiger counter
 
0
Assay Equipment
 
0
Rock Crusher
 
0
Hammer Pick
 
0
Exporation Drill Rig
 
0
Wearing a Green Stone Belt
 
0
If you know it post it, Post the right answer first and You'll be the first to know via SI Mail the Temagami Relationship to IVS
 
0
 
This poll is now closed (poll closed on 22 Apr 2016).

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: JW@KSC who wrote (49)4/22/2016 11:20:29 AM
From: JW@KSC
1 Recommendation   of 728
 
At least one of the investors I mentioned in the previous post, most likely does not hold the shares anymore.
He was the largest holder out of those I mentioned in :

NOTE: Also there are another Appox. 12M shares owned by 3 parties In 2011 (last date of record I have) by former Ginguro Associates or investors. Whether these Parties held those shares or not is an unknown.
Sheldon Inwentash in 2011 held 7,050,000 Shares and 1,125,000 Warrants in Ginguro.



Mining financier Sheldon Inwentash departs Pinetree Capital in big shakeup - Jan 27, 2015

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: JW@KSC who wrote (52)4/22/2016 2:01:16 PM
From: StemuliteWorks
   of 728
 
7 mill plus warrants? dang, have we even had that much volume collectively since then? Also, that would make for double that number total volume I would think unless another insider absorbed it but we would have heard about that through Sedar.

IDK, we shall see....Hey was I right on my answer? HaHaHa......kinda shootin from the hip, know very little other than what I read and hear from reputable people.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: StemuliteWorks who wrote (53)4/22/2016 8:09:05 PM
From: JW@KSC
   of 728
 
What choice did you pick in the poll, I can't see the Poll in Si Polls. And the Poll Link on the board no longer works??

Your right about Sheldon and his shares and warrants, thats a lot of shares and warrants.
Erie posted in 2013 about his buy on the MUX Board.

I can't locate it now but I saw the Sprott bought in on a private placement in Ginguro back in 2015 also. The problem with working on a tablet. I try to save this stuff in at least two places so it won't get lost but I cant find the older Sprott PP link anywhere.

But Im guessing it not matter what he purchase before as the newest one says

The Acquisition represents 7.8 % of the currently issued and outstanding Shares on a non-diluted basis and 11.3% on a partially diluted basis.


I hope that includes everything.

Sprott IVS - MARKETWIRED

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: JW@KSC who wrote (38)4/23/2016 11:34:45 PM
From: JW@KSC
   of 728
 
Things that go Bump in the Night and Disturb the Sound of Silence, then make you Wonder?

Following up on my previous post, in which I had written had asked

With No PR's by Endurance in 2016 on the IVS Private Placements or Inventus appoints Greg Gibson to Board of Directors and Sprott Mining Inc. as operator to manage the Pardo Joint Venture. Mean anything?

I did not receive any feedback on this part of the post. So I'm brining it up again..

I'm intrigued on the way the last IVS PR is worded.

Toronto, Ontario. Inventus Mining Corp. ("Inventus" or the "Company") (TSX.V: IVS) is pleased to announcethat Sprott Mining Inc. (“Sprott Mining”) has agreed to act as operator to manage the Pardo Joint Venture (“Pardo JV”) between Mount Logan Resources Ltd. (“Mount Logan”) and Endurance Gold Corporation (“Endurance”). Mount Logan is owned 100% by Inventus and owns 64.5 percent of the Pardo JV with 35.5 percent owned by Endurance. As operator of the Pardo JV, Mount Logan has arranged with Sprott Mining to act on the company’s behalf to develop a comprehensive bulk sampling program for the Pardo JV property commencing in 2016. A Pardo JV management committee meeting will be convened as soon as practicable to plan and approve the technical aspects of the program.
The way it is written using "JV Property" does this sound like they will be Bulk Sampling just the "JV part" of Pardo, or by using the Term "JV Property" are they are referring to the entire Pardo Project?

Anyones take on this and how it reads in their mind, would be appreciated.

The reason for asking others here for your interpretation, as later in the PR Whymark uses the term Pardo Project.

We are excited that Greg and his team will be taking the Pardo Project to the next level of its development as the first paleo placer gold deposit in Canada”, said Wayne Whymark Chairman and CEO of Inventus.
It sounds to me like the 2016 program will just be working (Bulk Sampling) in the JV section only.

And if so, why has there not been a PR put out by Endurance (ENDGF) ? BUMP


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: JW@KSC who wrote (55)4/24/2016 9:28:12 AM
From: Erie
   of 728
 
JW
I didn't reply before because I didn't have anything to add. I still don't, but since you asked again, it seemed that I should at least say 'My guess isn't any better than yours!'
My guess is that the fact that this PR focused on the JV solely doesn't mean that the Operator isn't going to do some bulk sampling and other planning/probing or whatever elsewhere.
My other guess is that the fact that Endurance didn't echo the PR may reflect that the relationship between the two companies is still in the toilet. Yeah, I know that's not an excuse to not inform one's shareholders, but given their history . . . . It does seem dumb, however, for Endurance to not let investors know that one of their projects is moving forward. Why not release news that might support the share price!

Erie

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: JW@KSC who wrote (54)4/24/2016 1:00:13 PM
From: StemuliteWorks
   of 728
 
I chose a gold pan.....best and most used tool when it gets right down to it!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10