SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Gold/Mining/EnergyInventus Mining Corp - IVS


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: JW@KSC who wrote (35)4/19/2016 1:45:09 PM
From: StemuliteWorks
   of 728
 
Thanks Vince "Stateside"and Thank JDub for posting that report......Pretty exciting stuff I think we all can agree....

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: StemuliteWorks who wrote (37)4/19/2016 3:12:02 PM
From: JW@KSC
   of 728
 
It use to be Endurance the IVS JV partner would piggyback off Ginguro's PR's hoping to Spotlight A little attention on Endurance. Share price appreciation would follow. But ever since IVS put out its PR last year about placing the Assets of the company on long term maintenance (which that PR has since vanished), Endurance has not put out a PR, Zip, Noda, yet there has been recent stock appreciation along with IVS.

Endurance Website PR Page

Pure Speculating and Brain Storming over Endurance lack of PR's.

Only speculating here, but Endurance was doing a lot of the Exploration at Pardo. Even in the Distal Zones of the IVS 65% owned Zones. Could Sprott Mining not only be now Managing The Exploration at Pardo but doing the Exploration Work itself also?

With No PR's by Endurance in 2016 on the IVS Private Placements or Inventus appoints Greg Gibson to Board of Directors and Sprott Mining Inc. as operator to manage the Pardo Joint Venture. Mean anything?

Will there be a future PR (after the Possible Consolidation) that someone will be buying out Endurance 35% stake in Pardo with Endurance getting some kind of Royalties on Pardo.

And why is it that the Recent IVS PR's mention Logan Resources and Whymark? Granted Ginguro aquired Logan and along with it the Pardo Property in July 2009. But I had never seen Logan mentioned since I Invested in Ginguro back in Dec 2012 following Mcewen's lead.

Comments?

I have never researched the Logan history or acquisition aspect in this, but will as time permits.
That is if anyone is interested?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: JW@KSC who wrote (38)4/20/2016 1:19:33 AM
From: molee
1 Recommendation   of 728
 
I am always interested in learning more about these guys , if you find the time ...

Also , I think I found the P.R. for you :

stockhouse.com

GO IVS.V / GNGXF ... >> M

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: molee who wrote (39)4/20/2016 5:28:38 AM
From: JW@KSC
   of 728
 
That's it ! Thanks Molee ! Glad to see someone's reading and willing to do some research.

Again, Thank You ! Not an easy task. Kinda reminds me of doing research on AmatI back on SI back in early 1996. Back then I used the. HotBot Search Engine, and when you typed in ADSL you got 6 hits, yet I was able to find plenty of information to formulate an opinion on weather to own the stock and post good informative Posts.

Reseach is an Art, you acquire the skills with time and dedication. There are a lot of Key aspects unknown to most.

You can either do the research yourself and get into a stock early or be late for the Party.

i.e. McEwen Mining/USGL or Amati. Amati Communications Corp. Oh I could have began in vesting much earlier, as I used to do research and knew of Companies like Microsoft before the went public in 1986, by reading Magazines like Technology Illustrated but had little to invest..
But in 1995 and the creation of the World Wide Web, I could put two of my passions together, research and investing. It was not long before I was debating Engineers on the Aspects Of DMT Line Code (Amati) vs CAP Line Code (AT&T) a battle similar to the VHS vs BETA MAX for the VCR Standard. DMT the ANSI / IEEE Standardn around the year 2000.

Know the Man: It helped knowing the CEO of Amati was a Professor at Stanford and he was at AT&T's Bell Lab's when AT&T created ADSL (simply DSL as its now Known, although the are Many Types of DSL.
If interested in that Research see one of my posts WHY DMT for ADSL

If you have time check out a chart of Cisco (CSCO) and see how many times that it Split 1:2 and 1:3 between 1990 and 2000 ?

Wow, Sorry, I guess I got off on a tangent there !

As far as as investing in MUX, I began research in Gold, boy was there a lot of hype back then and I caught a quote by someone who said Gold was going to $5000 oz. and I said who is this guy! LOL. The rest is history.....

This interview I found way back in 2006 explains a lot.
One of my first Posts, I posted on the MUX Board in Jan 2012 when I started the MUX Board, on the Early research I did into McEwen in 2006
; ^ )

Back in the days of Dial-Up and 28K & 56K Modems. LOL


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: JW@KSC who wrote (40)4/20/2016 12:14:39 PM
From: StemuliteWorks
   of 728
 
Hey Jdub, those Cisco Splits....Pretty sure those were forward splits, not reverse....

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: molee who wrote (39)4/20/2016 12:41:02 PM
From: JW@KSC
   of 728
 
Molee - Since your interested in learning more about these guys, are you at all interested in the geology as well?

I went on kinda a Geological Research Crusade shortly after investing in Ginguro and at the early stages it began with the comparisons between Witswater and Pardo. Once I found the first Gigantic Association, this lead me further and further down the road. As if a large magnetic was pulling me deeper and deeper in to my quench my thirst.

Finding little fascinating Gold Nuggets of Information keep feeding me like a drug addict always looking for another Fix or Gold Nugget, that added to the Bigger Picture, one puzzle piece at a time.

As with Amati Comm. Corp. ( from my last post) It seemed like I got hooked, and ventured again into uncharted territory that I knew nothing about.

So far I've learned a lot.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: StemuliteWorks who wrote (41)4/20/2016 2:35:48 PM
From: JW@KSC
1 Recommendation   of 728
 
StemuliteWorks - Sorry my brain works backwards after Midnight. Yes 2:1 .... I'll have to remember that in the Past.

I would think my mistake would be obvious to anyone reading that post, especially given the stock is Cisco.

Answer to the Cisco Question ??

Let's just say you bought a 1000 shares of Cisco in March 1992 at $5.00 a share. Or $5000.
How many shares would you have in March 2000? And just to make it simple, don't even include the 3:2 splits.

Or any other constructive comments / opinions on that post ?

"People on a team must be happy to be wrong as right. If their ideas hold up under strong (but fair) criticism, then great, they can proceed with confidence.

If their ideas are rejected, with good rationale then they have learned something.

A healthy team is made up of people who have the attitude that it is better to learn something new than be right."

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: JW@KSC who wrote (42)4/20/2016 2:55:59 PM
From: molee
   of 728
 
JW ... I am more interested in the financial aspect of these relationships .

I have no geological knowledge / background so I don't understand any of the terminology used .

Show me that "so and so" has turned a company profitable and I am all ears .

Bring this horse to the water and see if she'll drink ! ! !

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: molee who wrote (44)4/20/2016 5:06:09 PM
From: JW@KSC
1 Recommendation   of 728
 
Molee - I understand you're more interested in the Financial Relationships. The Term geological is often confused as it covers a few areas.

By using the term geological I did not mean down to the rocks. But in more in the overall lay of the land in general.

When following one thing, it can lead to another and another and another. I'm beginning to form a Picture again from Puzzle Pieces, as in another project I had that you know about.

Care to take a walk down the garden path with me and see where it leads?

Hey, up another penny today. Momentum however slow is forward progress.

JW


Tedious, but also rewarding !


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: JW@KSC who wrote (43)4/21/2016 12:00:37 PM
From: StemuliteWorks
   of 728
 
"People on a team must be happy to be wrong as right. If their ideas hold up under strong (but fair) criticism, then great, they can proceed with confidence.

If their ideas are rejected, with good rationale then they have learned something.

A healthy team is made up of people who have the attitude that it is better to learn something new than be right."

Hear Hear, I love this JDub!

Well the answer to you CSCO question is, without research, considerably more. Back in those days companies did forward splits like changing their socks. You see, market demand for US stock shares from baby boomers and the rest of the world was going through the roof and they wanted to make more shares available while keeping the share price "reasonable for the average bear". Not like Warren buffet (lower case intentional), who has never split his berkshire hathaway stock and that is why it is well over $100,000 per share.

This is what baffles me to a degree with IVS and their reversal. Valuations were correctly pointed out to be the same forward or reverse, we know this, so why the need to consolidate (reverse)?

I was told the reason was because the stock needs to be above .05 in Canada to do a capital raise, yet in the subsequent PR it states the need stems from possible future financing's. I stipulate to you, and all that neither of these are applicable any longer.

The share price looks pretty good above .10 and I think that, as was so astutely pointed out in an earlier post, "These Guys are not stupid". I believe that they have come to the knowledge that these bulk samplings will more than pay for themselves, in fact, will make the company immediately profitable with no need for any additional financing in a "seed money aspect".

JMHO........I bet no split.....any takers? .........I will still be happy, even if I am wrong.Thanks for that post JDub!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10