SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Gold/Mining/EnergyCCB vs ZEN truth board


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Zengold who wrote (12258)2/22/2021 6:35:26 AM
From: Mister D
of 12343
 
"We have already concluded ... "
Who is "We" ???
You, The Chief, The vacuum salesman ???
Please quantify your conclusion to justify your posting

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Zengold who wrote (12258)2/22/2021 8:33:12 AM
From: Rookie888
of 12343
 
You get what you pay for. None of those masks claim substantial efficacy against COVID. More emphasis on anti-bacterial. They all stay clear of claiming that they kill any virus for fear of liability I’m sure. “Meets guidelines for WHO” ...not approved by WHO. Not sure how you’ve concluded that the medical industry only wants disposable. Of course they want disposable because of risk of contamination. If there was reusable PPE that eliminates concern for contamination and virus killing then that alone is a substantial long term costs savings. If a product can come to market that can satisfy this then the industry will change its habits. This is all long term. All these masks companies you promote are just taking advantage of short term desperation and need. The pandemic has just exposed the many deficiencies in handling the crisis. Things inevitably have to change. The second mouse gets the cheese.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Rookie888 who wrote (12260)2/22/2021 8:54:35 AM
From: Zengold
of 12343
 
See you just answered your own question TT

"Of course they want disposable because of risk of contamination."

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Mister D who wrote (12259)2/22/2021 9:01:11 AM
From: Zengold
of 12343
 
You mean qualify my conclusion....the quantity of information supporting and requiring the use of disposable PPE in the medical field ie gloves, gowns, mask is abundant. Read some of the recent posts David.

NO ONE is buying an ugly plastic two disk respirator type mask from Trebor that can cross contaminate the next patient. Simply put. Leave your emotional attachment and blind love for ZEN and try to understand this simple fact.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Zengold who wrote (12261)2/22/2021 9:45:21 AM
From: Rookie888
of 12343
 
Not if there's PPE that becomes available that can claim honestly that it will be effective against viruses and reduce/eliminate contamination. I merely stated the common sense rationale for wanting disposable. The reality is, is that early on in the pandemic healthcare was forced to re-use PPE because of shortages. Hence the current flooding of the market. No one yet has developed a suitable solution but they're certainly trying.

"The company has received results from the latest round of testing of its proprietary, graphene-based coating formulation at Western University's ImPaKT facility Biosafety Level 3 laboratory in London, Ontario. Testing per the same protocol as earlier testing in accordance with ISO 18184:2019 (Textiles - Determination of Antiviral Activity of Textile Products) demonstrated that polypropylene mask material, treated with ZEN's coating was still 98% effective against COVID-19 at 108 days"


They're not pumping or exaggerating, just a positive outlook for the potential and performing their due diligence to ensure they can be 100% confident that they can stand behind their product and establish credibility. That's just good strategy. They're not hanging their hat on just this one opportunity but it is a critical one to focus on right now if things continue with the positive outcomes so far. There's no need to rush if this can potentially help fulfill a generational need.

Bottom line is you're always going to disagree. You're no different than your complaints about the 'Sheep' you call out on their optimism...you're just the pessimist counter. While they see SP growth, you see SP decline. If you're in fact a Zen shareholder why do you still bother holding shares when you clearly have no faith in the company, the BOD, their products, etc. Does it really matter that an eye doctor leads? Pretty sure there's a lot of great coaches who have never played their sport...just smart minds, critical thinkers that understand what needs to be done. If you claim that the SP will fall to 0.30 why don't sell all your shares. I'm sure the sheep will gladly buy them and you can short the stock all the way down and be happy with all your spoils and in the end can confidently claim 'I told you so'. Good luck to all regardless.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Rookie888 who wrote (12263)2/22/2021 9:51:46 AM
From: zenloverjiggy
of 12343
 
Rookie, Zengold is very very angry at the success of Zen and he is entitled to be. He made a mistake in not believing in new management and it has cost him dearly. People get very angry when they lose money. He is not on here to save everybody cause he is a good guy, just look at the anger. He is either short or pissed that he missed the move. Either way he wants to buy at a lower price. Its still not too late to buy and get on this rocket ship.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: zenloverjiggy who wrote (12264)2/22/2021 9:58:28 AM
From: Reflection
of 12343
 
Wondering why you boys even bother responding to ZG. the boy is another Hoover/Jiggy clone. Leave him be and use this site to post photos of old fat guys in tight shorts.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Zengold2/22/2021 1:03:05 PM
of 12343
 
Reminder if you cant follow SIs TOUs or the header on this board , post elsewhere

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Zengold2/22/2021 7:10:56 PM
of 12343
 
Yet another medical article and bulletin from the CDC as to WHY REUSEABLE N95 MASKS ARE NOT FOR PROLONGED MEDICAL USE.

Best line was the requirement to change your disposable gloves every time you touch the N95 MASK the health care professional is using the N95 MASK.

cdc.gov

Again the Zen Trebor business plan for these N95 masks and gloves cover in secret sauce has more holes than Swiss cheese IMHO. The sheep just can't see the reality .

Best line from a nursing friend was " what stupid company thinks front line workers are going to wipe asses, mop up blood and bodily fluids and still wear the stupid coated gloves after this? " EVERY NURSE doctor or healthcare worker will refuse to work in this was the case. To which I REPLIED ZEN GRAPHENE SOLUTION DOES !

And hospitals are not stocking several different types of masks, disposable, kind of disposable, disposable after 35 days etc....same disposable single use masks easy peasy.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Zengold2/22/2021 7:21:18 PM
of 12343
 
Speaking of failed business schemes, has anyone seen the numbers for the Albany Pure graphene online sales start by ZEN?

This was going to revolutionize the company , generate 10s of millions in sales profits for the construction of the Albany graphite mine.

Anybody? ....anybody? If you have to count over ten just take of your shoes!

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10