SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Gold/Mining/EnergyZen Graphene Solutions Ltd


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Candu who wrote (22392)11/27/2020 9:43:49 AM
From: LuckyShukr
1 Recommendation   of 25449
 
I believe the 15 cent price refers to the current filter as of date of publication October 26th.The filter is currently the same material as the three-ply mask. However, the company is changing over to filters made from a nano-material. Price to be determined.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: LuckyShukr who wrote (22393)11/27/2020 9:57:35 AM
From: Candu
   of 25449
 
Hi Lucky Shukr..... you may be right as the way it is written it can be taken either way. I seem to think is talking about the future masks. It is also not clear whether they are talking about each of two filters or for the two filters for each mask.

The Pro-Plus mask has a per-unit price to hospitals of $6.90; the filters cost approximately 15 cents. Irwin estimated on a monthly basis, a single Pro-Plus mask would cost a hospital $14.50 per employ.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: LuckyShukr who wrote (22393)11/27/2020 9:57:38 AM
From: Packfan1941
   of 25449
 
Yes, 15 cents and maybe not an exact price but it did say this:

The Pro-Plus mask has a per-unit price to hospitals of $6.90; the filters cost approximately 15 cents. Irwin estimated on a monthly basis, a single Pro-Plus mask would cost a hospital $14.50 per employ.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: George6911/27/2020 4:28:48 PM
   of 25449
 
End of day trading: looks like computer stuff. CIBC again last second, but bought this time.

Recent Trades - Last 10 of 580
Time ETExPriceChangeVolumeBuyerSeller Markers
15:59:59H1.82-0.0310079 CIBC1 AnonymousK
15:59:51V1.78-0.0710079 CIBC1 AnonymousK
15:59:46V1.78-0.0710079 CIBC1 AnonymousK
15:59:43V1.78-0.0710079 CIBC1 AnonymousK
15:59:42V1.78-0.0710079 CIBC1 AnonymousK
15:59:41V1.78-0.0710079 CIBC1 AnonymousK
15:59:41V1.78-0.0710079 CIBC1 AnonymousK
15:59:40V1.78-0.0710079 CIBC1 AnonymousK
15:59:40V1.78-0.0710079 CIBC1 AnonymousK
15:59:40V1.78-0.07

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: George69 who wrote (22396)11/27/2020 4:31:04 PM
From: Packfan1941
   of 25449
 
Funny, My TD trading shows it closed at 1.78. Doesn't reflect that last trade.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Packfan1941 who wrote (22397)11/27/2020 4:41:34 PM
From: George69
   of 25449
 
Yes TD did show that!. Strange but maybe TD considered it painting. Don't know.
...hope we get some news early next week to move this bigly.
Cheers

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: George69 who wrote (22398)11/27/2020 4:46:05 PM
From: Packfan1941
   of 25449
 
Bigly, lol. Great word!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Packfan1941 who wrote (22399)11/27/2020 5:20:26 PM
From: George69
   of 25449
 
Eff!!!! Just looked bigly up and it is credited to Thump(he is in my brain in a verrry bad way).....Somebody please delete my post!!!!
Geeeorge!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: George69 who wrote (22400)11/27/2020 5:59:38 PM
From: Packfan1941
   of 25449
 
Well,

Nothing wrong with his vocabulary, never knew it was a real word.

bigly
/'bigle/

adverb
INFORMAL•HUMOROUS

to a great extent; on a large scale.

"we are going to reduce taxes bigly"



Definitions from Oxford Languages

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: George6911/27/2020 6:22:04 PM
4 Recommendations   of 25449
 
Friday night so good time to throw out a few thoughts:
...please accept the following is not political but fact and an example which will be clear to clear headed individuals if you give me a chance to follow through.
-on Jan.28 2020 the Donald received classified info about Covid 19. He was told it was airborne, much more lethal than the flu and the devastation which would ensue. The Donald chose to hide these facts from the American people and the world, and instead said basically...all is well. Well all was not well! History will look down on this as one of the most egregious and callous and lethal decisions ever made. JMO lol
- sorry but back to ZGS...if HC ignores the science and dismisses our magic sauce...well they will also go down in history as one of the most callous and lethal decisions to affect our health. They cannot test and would have to have a very convoluted reason to deny the excellent work done at the level 3 facility. The potential benefits to health care workers and everyone from having this extra layer of protection...well millions may live. I believe our magic sauce is a game changer in PPE and filters and delay means deaths!!
All of course JMO
Cheers to next week
George

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)
Previous 10 Next 10