SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Biotech / MedicalNNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: NewMoney_812 who wrote (270)1/3/2016 4:35:06 PM
From: drkaz
1 Recommendation   of 326
 
It's quite funny that you actually think it is me that is confused.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Rawnoc who wrote (267)1/11/2016 12:19:49 PM
From: invest07
   of 326
 
Getting my teeth kicked in,haha. I've been out for some time and will get back in with more favorable news-- unlike you and your con scamming friends who have never been in,( according to you but who would believe you?) and bash every day. I believe the Yahoo postings because they expose you and friends for what you are and you can't delete as you do on other boards after setting yourself up as a mod,hahaha. All other board members are running 9-1 against you--would be same on IHub if you couldn't delete---- so what does that tell me?

How about telling us about all your scam stocks that you DO own that are losing money,ROFL?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: NewMoney_812 who wrote (268)1/11/2016 12:26:02 PM
From: invest07
   of 326
 
Your teeth seem to have lots of pyrolysis material stuck between them. Better go to a dentist,ROFL.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: invest07 who wrote (272)1/11/2016 1:01:47 PM
From: Rawnoc
   of 326
 
Better question -- what does it tell YOU about YOU that you count the "popularity votes" of a Yahoo message board voted by a bunch of scammers on a scam stock down 80%?

I don't even read the Yahoo board anymore let alone post. Last time I was there it was 2 or 3 of the same crooks spamming it all day.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: invest07 who wrote (273)1/19/2016 8:51:20 PM
From: NewMoney_812
1 Recommendation   of 326
 
You seem to be a bit confused as well. Don't look now but a paid stock tout has you wrapped around his finger.

ROFL

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: NewMoney_812 who wrote (275)1/19/2016 10:30:44 PM
From: drkaz
1 Recommendation   of 326
 
Ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,...

*snort*

Ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,... ha,.... ha,...

*wheeze*

Ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,...

Oh,.... you were trying to be serious,.... weren't you?

There's only one cadre of "paid stock tout" hanging about NNVC,.... and I don't think it is whom you are implying that it is,....

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: drkaz who wrote (276)1/20/2016 6:56:08 AM
From: NewMoney_812
1 Recommendation   of 326
 
You know exactly who it is. And how much money has been milked out of sucker investors that have been led astray all the way down from $7 to penny land with this crap.

Shame.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: drkaz who wrote (276)1/21/2016 6:17:31 PM
From: Rawnoc
   of 326
 
What drug were you on when you wrote this laughable nonsense?

siliconinvestor.com

(1) You ASSume that every single man, woman, and child will buy the drug at full value rather than something based in reality that a relatively much smaller percentage of the people.

(2) You call an entire $45 million in mythical sales as net income -- $0 allocated for cost of the drugs or overhead which are already significant.

(3) Then you use a P/E ratio static in response to a post using P/S statics.

By the way, if you used the laughable ASSumption that everybody with a disease got cured by NNVC, there would be little if anybody left the following year to cure! The 45,000 people per year who get the disease need to get it from UNCURED people for the most part otherwise the numbers diminish to zero.

Better ASSumption, yet still wildly optimistic, would be say 25% take the drug so there are still plenty of new and uncured people to keep it spreading. Your $45 million goes down to barely any profit if any at all. It would realistically bring the company a lot closer to break-even at best which is great but it's nowhere near the laughable attempt at analysis in your post.

No wonder you're getting your butt handed to you -- Even the basic mathematics of stocks escape you.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Rawnoc who wrote (278)1/22/2016 12:01:40 PM
From: drkaz
1 Recommendation   of 326
 
It must just eat you up inside to know that:

1) I could give a rat's hairy arse what you think or say about what I write,.... and that none of it has had any negative impact on my investment NNVC,.... and that in fact that I have continued to build my stash of NNVC shares over the last nearly 2 years you have spent bashing the company,... at a discount to my long-term cost average. Thanks for the small part that you might have played in that btw.

2) That your take on NNVC's long-term outcome will - much like just about everything else you either bash or pump - be demonstrated to be wrong,.... and I will remain unflappable.

3) I actually was stone-cold sober when I wrote that, that it is factually and logically correct, and that it could easily come to pass,.... further demonstrating that you know nothing about which you write here,... and likely elsewhere.

Later dude!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (3)


To: drkaz who wrote (279)1/22/2016 12:31:10 PM
From: Rawnoc
1 Recommendation   of 326
 
Yeah you don't care what I have to say except that you find it extremely important to let me know that all the time.

ROFL!!!!

(1) Bragging about being upside-down on this POS (so can buy cheaper lol lol lol) that has severely disappointed virtually all of your timeframes -- ones that I warned you about were beyond ridiculous -- is quite priceless.

(2) I have NEVER -- repeat -- NEVER been wrong on my predictions of doom for a biowreck. NNVC won't be the first, or the last, but rather a very long history of successful predictions in this regard. To be fair, this perfect track record on biowrecks is because I select easy targets. In this case, some con artist crook in charge of telling the world through penny pump sites that he has a cure for all viruses? ROFL!!!!! How are you going to face the wife when this thing implodes and she finds out you fell for that crap?

(3) If you were stone-cold sober talking about using a P/E ratio on sales then you simply have NO idea what you are doing regarding this or any other stock.

Jim Jones had nothing on Seymour.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10