| To: NewMoney_812 who wrote (275) | 1/19/2016 10:30:44 PM | | From: drkaz | | | | Ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,...
*snort*
Ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,... ha,.... ha,...
*wheeze*
Ha,... ha,.... ha,... ha,.... ha,...
Oh,.... you were trying to be serious,.... weren't you?
There's only one cadre of "paid stock tout" hanging about NNVC,.... and I don't think it is whom you are implying that it is,.... |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2) |
|
| To: drkaz who wrote (276) | 1/20/2016 6:56:08 AM | | From: NewMoney_812 | | | | You know exactly who it is. And how much money has been milked out of sucker investors that have been led astray all the way down from $7 to penny land with this crap.
Shame. |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| To: drkaz who wrote (276) | 1/21/2016 6:17:31 PM | | From: Rawnoc | | | | What drug were you on when you wrote this laughable nonsense?
siliconinvestor.com
(1) You ASSume that every single man, woman, and child will buy the drug at full value rather than something based in reality that a relatively much smaller percentage of the people.
(2) You call an entire $45 million in mythical sales as net income -- $0 allocated for cost of the drugs or overhead which are already significant.
(3) Then you use a P/E ratio static in response to a post using P/S statics.
By the way, if you used the laughable ASSumption that everybody with a disease got cured by NNVC, there would be little if anybody left the following year to cure! The 45,000 people per year who get the disease need to get it from UNCURED people for the most part otherwise the numbers diminish to zero.
Better ASSumption, yet still wildly optimistic, would be say 25% take the drug so there are still plenty of new and uncured people to keep it spreading. Your $45 million goes down to barely any profit if any at all. It would realistically bring the company a lot closer to break-even at best which is great but it's nowhere near the laughable attempt at analysis in your post.
No wonder you're getting your butt handed to you -- Even the basic mathematics of stocks escape you. |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| To: Rawnoc who wrote (278) | 1/22/2016 12:01:40 PM | | From: drkaz | | | | It must just eat you up inside to know that:
1) I could give a rat's hairy arse what you think or say about what I write,.... and that none of it has had any negative impact on my investment NNVC,.... and that in fact that I have continued to build my stash of NNVC shares over the last nearly 2 years you have spent bashing the company,... at a discount to my long-term cost average. Thanks for the small part that you might have played in that btw.
2) That your take on NNVC's long-term outcome will - much like just about everything else you either bash or pump - be demonstrated to be wrong,.... and I will remain unflappable.
3) I actually was stone-cold sober when I wrote that, that it is factually and logically correct, and that it could easily come to pass,.... further demonstrating that you know nothing about which you write here,... and likely elsewhere.
Later dude! |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (3) |
|
| To: drkaz who wrote (279) | 1/22/2016 12:31:10 PM | | From: Rawnoc | | | | Yeah you don't care what I have to say except that you find it extremely important to let me know that all the time.
ROFL!!!!
(1) Bragging about being upside-down on this POS (so can buy cheaper lol lol lol) that has severely disappointed virtually all of your timeframes -- ones that I warned you about were beyond ridiculous -- is quite priceless.
(2) I have NEVER -- repeat -- NEVER been wrong on my predictions of doom for a biowreck. NNVC won't be the first, or the last, but rather a very long history of successful predictions in this regard. To be fair, this perfect track record on biowrecks is because I select easy targets. In this case, some con artist crook in charge of telling the world through penny pump sites that he has a cure for all viruses? ROFL!!!!! How are you going to face the wife when this thing implodes and she finds out you fell for that crap?
(3) If you were stone-cold sober talking about using a P/E ratio on sales then you simply have NO idea what you are doing regarding this or any other stock.
Jim Jones had nothing on Seymour. |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| To: drkaz who wrote (279) | 1/22/2016 12:57:33 PM | | From: Rawnoc | | | | | ROFL....just took a peek at Yahoo for the first time in a while. harding_a1 again me lol. He doesn't even post like me even remotely. I see he has your panties up in a bunch though. lol lol lol lol |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| From: Rawnoc | 1/22/2016 1:54:12 PM | | | | | | 500 gram batch of Flucide still not achieved.
lol
What a POS |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| To: drkaz who wrote (279) | 1/24/2016 5:32:48 PM | | From: NewMoney_812 | | | | "I could give a rat's hairy arse what you think or say about what I write"
Really? Coulda fooled me.
"none of it has had any negative impact on my investment NNVC"
Ok, that I agree with. NNVC needs no help being the most obvious really bad penny stock disaster in years. They have screwed the pooch all by themselves, and us trying to point that out will not have any effect on it.
Nor will you posting poorly written pumps on Seeking Alpha.
Nor did Pump Terminator tank the stock. All he did was point out the scheme to the world and predict, quite accurately, a potential 80% downside that came to pass thanks to the bumbling idiots at NNVC.
What I am hanging around for is the end game where we find out if they're bumbling idiot wanna be scientists who can barely make a rum and coke much less a nano machine, or are they garden variety crooks.
|
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| |
