| To: NewMoney_812 who wrote (245) | 8/29/2015 11:54:50 PM | | From: drkaz | | | | Don't promote. State facts - pro and when merited con.
Unlike "some" other parties.
And I actually put my investment money on the line. Unlike many of you all who claim to have no skin in this game.
But - yammer on,... Not like what you state makes an actual difference one way or the other. |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2) |
|
| To: drkaz who wrote (246) | 8/30/2015 12:15:13 PM | | From: invest07 | | | | | I see you are conversing with the two non stockholders who are most mentioned on the Yahoo board as being very unscrupulous . Why do you think they are putting so much negative effort into a stock they have never owned shares in? |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| To: drkaz who wrote (246) | 8/30/2015 4:19:57 PM | | From: NewMoney_812 | | | | "Not like what you state makes an actual difference one way or the other."
True enough. At least you get the fact that message boards and meanies talking bad about a company on a message board have absolutely no effect on a stock. Unlike some of the amateur traders that think Rawnoc and I and others are the same person and we're destroying the stock. We are responding to the stock, the stock is not responding to us.
This company's stock got to this point because of the company. Period.
Good luck. I think this is going to zero. If I'm not mistaken, it won't be the first stock these crooks took to zero.
Easy call and good for lot's of laughs. |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| To: invest07 who wrote (247) | 8/30/2015 6:36:30 PM | | From: drkaz | | | | invest07 - I would think that the reasons these two particular individuals chose to spend so much of their time yammering on about a stock the claim to not be invested in fall into a few obvious categories - with some likely potential subcategories contained within each broader category:
1) They are either actively shorting NNVC stocks themselves, or they are not doing so themselves but are gaining some type of financial compensation from an anonymous 3rd party who is actively shorting NNVC.
Or
2) They recognize the long-term value potential value of NNVC stocks themselves and are actively trying to do what they can to undermine confidence in the company so that they can buy in at a low price before it does make a significant upward swing,... or they are gaining financial compensation in the short-term while working for an anonymous 3rd party who intends to do so.
Or - this I view as far less likely -
3) They are working for a 3rd party inside of "Big Pharma" who wants to increase their likelihood that they can buy into what NNVC will eventually produce for a very low sweetheart licensing price from an otherwise cash-strapped NNVC.
Or,... they could just be A-holes. But that I doubt - as sans any financial incentive - I don't think A-holes would waste as much time here as these two or three dudes in particular do. |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (3) |
|
| To: drkaz who wrote (249) | 8/30/2015 8:16:38 PM | | From: NewMoney_812 | | | | they could just be A-holes.
CORRECT! It's a sport for me. I like to find an obvious scam and completely screw with the dimwits that can't see it for what it is, and are about to lose their money. I never play biowrecks. I like stocks like AAPL and AMZN and TSLA.
Although one could follow Mikey over on the swingtrade board and make money, he's a microcap master. I on the other hand just like to bait fools. I'm a master at that.
Don't say it.... |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| To: drkaz who wrote (249) | 9/1/2015 12:22:08 AM | | From: Rawnoc | | | | "they could just be A-holes"
Correct!
NewMoney and I were just discussing privately -- what are we going to do after NNVC does its inevitably implosion to zero? This stock is entertainment -- just like if the Psychic Friends Network or Miss Cleo were still active we would have a blast throwing rocks at them.
I look forward to the next blast -- speaking for myself, I enjoy laughing at a biowreck peddling a snake oil. Got any tips of others? |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| To: drkaz who wrote (249) | 9/6/2015 7:25:20 PM | | From: invest07 | | | | | I would go with a combination of # 3 and a-hole. Like you say no one would live on a message board stock they do not own shares in without some type of financial return. This seems to be the thoughts of majority of posters from other boards also. What a rewarding life they live huh? |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| To: invest07 who wrote (254) | 9/7/2015 8:11:40 AM | | From: NewMoney_812 | | | | I make all my trading decisions myself and don't whine like a little school girl when I make a bad trade. As a side hobby I like to find and screw with douche bags that blame everyone from unscrupulous market makers to meanies talking bad about their stock on message boards for their bad trades.
I find that having ONE speculative stock in a portfolio otherwise filled with big board dividend stocks is the way to go. Sometimes I have more than one but never more than 5% of the portfolio.
That way I don't end up crying like a bitch and blaming everyone else because I'M a dumbass.
Just sayin' |
| | NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (3) |
|
| |
