SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Strategies & Market TrendsZman Market Timing


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: da_cheif™ who wrote (14759)9/1/2017 11:47:53 PM
From: sandeep
2 Recommendations   of 15884
 
Well, cheifo, you are like a pot calling the kettle black! You ban people because they doubt your boolishness which is always there whether in the 2001 or 2009 downturn. Of course, long term record is good if boolish is all you are.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: sandeep who wrote (14760)9/2/2017 3:07:15 AM
From: JimisJim
3 Recommendations   of 15884
 
did you just admit chief's been right all these years? Some have been shouting about the certainty of looming disaster daily for months (years?) -- sooner or later that will be correct for awhile, but if one's been bullish, then "long term record is good"... your statement sort of puts everything here into perspective... so glad I didn't let 2008-09 scare me... good luck! This has been an interesting and entertaining board to read -- and I admit I learned a thing or two here...

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: sandeep who wrote (14760)9/2/2017 7:28:09 AM
From: da_cheif™
2 Recommendations   of 15884
 
smooch

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: humble1 who wrote (14758)9/2/2017 9:10:24 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™
23 Recommendations   of 15884
 
I find your plea hollow and insincere... so stop pretending to be humble, clearly you're anything but...

Here's why you banned me:

You posted numerous photos on your thread, I thought they were nicely taken pics and I once color enhanced one of your pics... you then scolded me that I shouldn't "touch" your photos, that you took them and thought they were perfect as posted and I should "never touch them again"...

Then, I found a resort brochure elsewhere with the exact same picture which you claimed you took yourself... I asked you how can both pictures be identical?? Are you a professional photographer???

Clearly, you're just a plagiarist claiming other people's photos as your own personal property because upon that question you immediately banned me to "kill the messenger" and escape further embarrassment of being caught in a lie, so please don't pretend to be righteous...

Yes, you took those pictures, you took them from someone else and claiming them as your own personal property without their permission and/or referencing their credits... not only is that theft, it's also a Violation of the SI Terms of Use...

If you copied a photo from another source, you should have provided the link, this is required to indicate the photo is not your personal property... in fact, you have violated the SI Terms of Use Code numerous times!!!

Under the SI Terms of Use Member Conduct, section 2c, it says:

Posting or transmitting third party copyrighted information or in any way infringing on the intellectual property rights, contractual or fiduciary rights of others.

siliconinvestor.com

Oh, danny, boy... tsk, tsk...

GZ

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: humble1 who wrote (14758)9/2/2017 10:10:51 AM
From: zman69
   of 15884
 
Thank you H1! As usual you have nailed it. You are truly a class act. It's too bad the admin has been bamboozled by trolls.

I refuse to put any further effort into this thread or share my work at a place where those who run the site don't appreciate it and don't show any respect for my right to control the content of my board. Already what was a valuable board has devolved into a food fight due to the undesirables being allowed to post here.

Good going Soup Nazi. Way to destroy what was one of the best board here.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (14763)9/2/2017 10:18:23 AM
From: zman69
1 Recommendation   of 15884
 
I have banned GZ again for his food fights and personal attacks like this that are destroying this board. If admin Soup Nazi doesn't meddle improperly again and prevent me from maintaining the quality of this board (which before GZ got involved was 100% focused on market timing) then we can resume the normal programming and Zman's market timing will be back. OTOH if Admin reinstates GZ then I'm not even coming back to check on this site ever again. Just let this thread fall apart into pernsoal attack food fight thread. Ball is in admins court. I would advise all who value Zman's TA to make their desire known.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: zman69 who wrote (14765)9/2/2017 10:24:26 AM
From: rdkflorida2
3 Recommendations   of 15884
 
I remember when you banned me for stepping over the line. Later you removed the ban. Unlike others I did not go whining to Admin. I changed and did my best to stick to the rules. GZ is a two faced hypocrite, IMO. At his boards he bans good people and praises people that, IMO, are boarder line racists and Neo-Nazis. I do not always agree with your calls, but at least you put them out there in a clear and open manner. Keep it going. RDK.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: rdkflorida2 who wrote (14766)9/2/2017 10:29:18 AM
From: zman69
1 Recommendation   of 15884
 
Thanks rkd you are a class act as well!

The reason Zman is quick to ban troublemakers is because he want to maintain the quality and integrity of this board with a 100% focus on quality TA free from food fights, personal attacks, and noise.

Ask yourself why would a poster ask admin to override my ban when said poster NEVER posts anything of substance here. No TA, no market timing analysis, just personal attacks, and snark/taunting. And yet admin plays along with this???

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: zman69 who wrote (14767)9/2/2017 10:37:07 AM
From: SI Ron (Crazy Soup Man)
3 Recommendations   of 15884
 
If the people I released act up you can always ban them again and I won't step in next time. I felt the bans were not just. This was a one time release for them.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: zman69 who wrote (14767)9/2/2017 10:40:58 AM
From: rdkflorida2
   of 15884
 
I agree. He should just post his work and give his reasons. What I have found is that everyone has opinions, but most are willing to post their facts without making "snarky" remarks. I try to read and digest everyones' posts. IMHO, there is no need for the "snarky" commentary. Stick around and keep posting your timing info. I made some nice money playing with SPXU on the down side during August. (I had August called for a weak correction). Now I see an UP move to over 2500 on the SPX (and maybe to 2700). IMHO, there is just too much money going into the indexes to see your "crash" scenario take place. I think October might have more down, but no "crash" just yet. At least not without a Black Swan event. The middle of 2018 is where I see something happening. Sorry to be so long winded. GLTU going forward. RDK

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10