SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Strategies & Market TrendsZman Market Timing


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: AdvocatusDiaboli who wrote (14753)9/1/2017 7:35:31 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™
1 Recommendation   of 15884
 
Exactly, very well said...

GZ

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: SI Ron (Crazy Soup Man) who wrote (14742)9/1/2017 8:52:11 PM
From: sandeep
4 Recommendations   of 15884
 
I don't know what reasons zman gave for banning GZ, but I believe it is ok for someone not to want to give voice to a person who frequently posts extremely foul postings. They have to do with politics, but it should be perfectly fine for a board owner to not want drivel like that.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: sandeep who wrote (14755)9/1/2017 9:31:40 PM
From: AdvocatusDiaboli
1 Recommendation   of 15884
 
We must be careful not to allow our passion for something to drive us to cross the line.
We all know GZ has been very passionate in his support for Teflon and staunchly supported him when his cause seemed hopeless. However he has been known to use some flowery language that would have been better left unsaid.
I hope GZ will take Penance for his sins and wash his mouth out with soap as his market timing contributions are greatly respected.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: AdvocatusDiaboli who wrote (14756)9/1/2017 10:05:06 PM
From: sandeep
   of 15884
 
Well said!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: SI Ron (Crazy Soup Man) who wrote (14742)9/1/2017 11:01:21 PM
From: humble1
4 Recommendations   of 15884
 
I hope zman will reconsider. Perhaps admin could reach out to him. How about a warning in the intro: "All who enter here, this is a HIGH BAN zone." Then let zman run it likes he wants to. He never posts anything ugly or offensive. He doesn't try to sell anything. He doesn't go to other sites and harass posters. What's so very wrong about banning posters who post no content or harass or who are trying to promote themselves and their products?

And, oh yeah, zman is the best timer anywhere when he is hot. He is hot a lot.

Being a moderator is a lot of work. Those who are trading for themselves, and not selling, get paid nothing.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: humble1 who wrote (14750)9/1/2017 11:06:38 PM
From: da_cheif™
5 Recommendations   of 15884
 
danny danny danny ur ban list is based on nothing more than what zman was guilty of

siliconinvestor.com

if everyone one on ur ban list went to si and complained like GZ did here ur list would be empty...grow up willya

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: da_cheif™ who wrote (14759)9/1/2017 11:47:53 PM
From: sandeep
2 Recommendations   of 15884
 
Well, cheifo, you are like a pot calling the kettle black! You ban people because they doubt your boolishness which is always there whether in the 2001 or 2009 downturn. Of course, long term record is good if boolish is all you are.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: sandeep who wrote (14760)9/2/2017 3:07:15 AM
From: JimisJim
3 Recommendations   of 15884
 
did you just admit chief's been right all these years? Some have been shouting about the certainty of looming disaster daily for months (years?) -- sooner or later that will be correct for awhile, but if one's been bullish, then "long term record is good"... your statement sort of puts everything here into perspective... so glad I didn't let 2008-09 scare me... good luck! This has been an interesting and entertaining board to read -- and I admit I learned a thing or two here...

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: sandeep who wrote (14760)9/2/2017 7:28:09 AM
From: da_cheif™
2 Recommendations   of 15884
 
smooch

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: humble1 who wrote (14758)9/2/2017 9:10:24 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™
23 Recommendations   of 15884
 
I find your plea hollow and insincere... so stop pretending to be humble, clearly you're anything but...

Here's why you banned me:

You posted numerous photos on your thread, I thought they were nicely taken pics and I once color enhanced one of your pics... you then scolded me that I shouldn't "touch" your photos, that you took them and thought they were perfect as posted and I should "never touch them again"...

Then, I found a resort brochure elsewhere with the exact same picture which you claimed you took yourself... I asked you how can both pictures be identical?? Are you a professional photographer???

Clearly, you're just a plagiarist claiming other people's photos as your own personal property because upon that question you immediately banned me to "kill the messenger" and escape further embarrassment of being caught in a lie, so please don't pretend to be righteous...

Yes, you took those pictures, you took them from someone else and claiming them as your own personal property without their permission and/or referencing their credits... not only is that theft, it's also a Violation of the SI Terms of Use...

If you copied a photo from another source, you should have provided the link, this is required to indicate the photo is not your personal property... in fact, you have violated the SI Terms of Use Code numerous times!!!

Under the SI Terms of Use Member Conduct, section 2c, it says:

Posting or transmitting third party copyrighted information or in any way infringing on the intellectual property rights, contractual or fiduciary rights of others.

siliconinvestor.com

Oh, danny, boy... tsk, tsk...

GZ

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)
Previous 10 Next 10