SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Gold/Mining/EnergyZentek Ltd - ZEN


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Steakhouse who wrote ()7/19/2022 11:31:04 AM
From: Cinema Show
3 Recommendations   of 15409
 
Thought we were passed putting biased opinion pieces on the site. Or from a content perspective, anything on this topic regardless how subtle it attempts to be.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Steakhouse who wrote ()7/19/2022 11:36:42 AM
From: George69
   of 15409
 
Seems you are sliding into spewing right wing ideology Steak. Nobody is arguing that natural immunity from infection is not beneficial (if you survive lol), butt this article is decidedly anti-vaccine as shown by this and other statements/comments after the results are shown:
"Even absent these findings, vaccine mandates were dubious from the beginning. The morality of violating bodily autonomy through government coercion is a serious and dangerous matter. In light of these findings, however, vaccine mandates also appear nonsensical."
Cheers
PS The best protection is Zenguard PPE!!!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Cinema Show who wrote (14553)7/19/2022 11:38:12 AM
From: Steakhouse
5 Recommendations   of 15409
 
New England Journal of Medicine is hardly biased. One of the most respected health care entities in the World. Just thought the study was interesting being put out by them. Lots of other World wide studies have come up with the same results but having NEJM validate these findings is interesting. I am NOT a anti vacciner but do believe folks should have a choice to vaccinate or not to vaccinate. That is all.

Steakhouse

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: George69 who wrote (14554)7/19/2022 11:43:49 AM
From: Steakhouse
2 Recommendations   of 15409
 
Don't believe NEJM is a right wing organization. If anything they lean a bit Left. What they try not to do is politicize their studies.

Steakhouse

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Steakhouse who wrote (14556)7/19/2022 11:50:54 AM
From: George69
   of 15409
 
Did you even read the whole article Steak? I am not doubting the studies, it is the anti vaccine stuff after which I have an issue with and has no place here. And I never said the NEJM is right wing!!! They are a scientific organization and not some nutjob group like it appears this website belongs to.
Enough!!!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: George69 who wrote (14557)7/19/2022 11:58:36 AM
From: Steakhouse
   of 15409
 
Just referring to the study George. Others opinions in the article do not matter to me. Free Country and everyone can have an opinion. The study is science and opinions are like belly buttons, everyone has one.

Last post on this.

Steakhouse

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: Steakhouse who wrote (14558)7/19/2022 12:27:31 PM
From: Cinema Show
4 Recommendations   of 15409
 
So why not post the study itself if you are so motivated to share your interests. Rather you chose to share a piece using as cover the NESM and it's Omicron specific study. Really, bodily autonomy vs public health (women's health). Sure just all belly buttons, no issues, no pots being stirred.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Cinema Show who wrote (14559)7/19/2022 12:38:48 PM
From: Steakhouse
   of 15409
 
Fair post and duly noted.

Steakhouse

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Steakhouse who wrote (14558)7/19/2022 4:44:00 PM
From: ValuHunter
1 Recommendation   of 15409
 
Steak, I think George is trying to say and it is my opinion as well that the article should have been posted on Benton's BB. Let try to keep the negativity or controversial opinions where they belong and that is Benton's BB. I have no problem with the content other than it does not support our narrative for this board...

VH

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: ValuHunter who wrote (14561)7/19/2022 5:11:26 PM
From: Cinema Show
   of 15409
 
I would have responded similarly on Benton's. Not speaking for George or any one else. It was not appropriate for either.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10