We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon
Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
I gave up on winter tires when I bought a set of Nokian All Season Tires (Made in Finland), all season rated for ice and snow. At the time they were the only tires rated for winter and summer driving and they do a great job. I have them on my Subaru and I love them. No more changing to winter tires, see the video, its good info.
Someone told me that with Subaru's, if you have to replace a single tire, you should replace all four tires. That could be an expensive proposition. Is there any truth to this?
Looks like a good product. I didn't look up all-weather ones - too used to the seasonal-roulette concept and generally, products that try to be all things to all needs end up compromising so much that it makes them mediocre overall. But it looks like Nokian gets good reviews like this one at Consumer Reports, plus as a user where you get harsh winters, I'd be inclined to believe you about them. What kind of mileage do you get out of them?
It all depends on the tread depth, if its more than 3/32 different they recommend you replace all the tires. Its rare that you have to replace on tire. I never had to all the years I have been driving. If your tires get slashed they usually do one side. Insurance will sometimes cover all tires if they need to be replaced so it does not damage your differential. Some times they will not cover it.
They have been on my car for 10 years, I don't drive it much anymore, I put about 2000 KM on it a year, my tires are about 50% worn. Just guessing I have not gauged them. I have 46,000 KM on the car.
I will not buy anything but Nokian all weather tires.
