SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  For example, here is how to disable FireFox ad content blocking while on Silicon Investor.

   Technology StocksApple, Inc. Unmoderated


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Doren who wrote (8340)6/17/2019 2:29:45 AM
From: clochard
   of 9971
 
Apple will release an even more expensive iPhone 11 and expect everyone to buy it or one of its older models. Imagine buying an iPhone 7 now because its the only one you can afford (or want to spend the money on). They will be superseded just like in the 90's with their expensive junk.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: clochard who wrote (8341)6/17/2019 2:44:06 AM
From: J.F. Sebastian
   of 9971
 
Really, are you privy to Apple's marketing and pricing decisions around the iPhone 11, or are you simply speculating the next iPhone will be even more expensive? Pretty sure it's the latter.

If you have inside information, do tell!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: J.F. Sebastian who wrote (8342)6/17/2019 3:01:22 AM
From: clochard
   of 9971
 
news.softpedia.com

news.softpedia.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: clochard who wrote (8343)6/17/2019 3:50:49 AM
From: J.F. Sebastian
   of 9971
 
The first article doesn't mention anything about a price for the iPhone 11, only expected features.

The second article is about a company that say it can hack Android and iOS devices, again not mentioning any pricing info for the upcoming iPhone.

They are non sequiturs to the question I asked.

Stop wasting my time.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: J.F. Sebastian who wrote (8344)6/17/2019 5:43:11 AM
From: clochard
   of 9971
 
Let's see how long AAPL holds up when every big fund decides to dump it in the face of lowered guidance and the global slump.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: clochard who wrote (8345)6/17/2019 1:37:32 PM
From: lucky_limey
   of 9971
 
I am thinking that a proper trade agreement with China will have to give Chinese companies access to USA markets.... just as we demand acess to theirs. That will be a disaster for AAPL

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: lucky_limey6/17/2019 1:54:29 PM
1 Recommendation   of 9971
 
Why did Apple invest billions in an LCD plant when the entire industry, including AAPL was moving off LCD to OLED?


Japan Display, in need of funds, says Taiwan's TPK decided not to invest

JUNE 16, 2019 / 8:10 PM / UPDATED 12 HOURS AGO

TOKYO (Reuters) - Japan Display Inc on Monday said it has received notice from
TPK Holding Co Ltd that the Taiwanese screen maker has decided not to invest a
proposed $230 million, muddying the outlook for the Apple Inc supplier.


More at: reuters.com

Apple agrees to wait for c.$1.5B owed by Japan Display, to assist bailout
Ben Lovejoy - May. 30th 2019 5:47 am PT

Apple has agreed to wait for money owed to it by Japan Display in order to assist
the bailout of the troubled display-maker …

Reuters doesn’t go into details on the money owed to Apple, but it likely relates to
the Cupertino company paying most of the upfront costs of a new LCD factory built
specifically for iPhone production back in 2015.

It was reported back in March that Apple paid most of the $1.5B cost of the facility,
with an agreement that it would be repaid as a percentage of each screen sold.
However, little was repaid due to falling demand for LCD panels as smartphone
makers switched to OLED.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: lucky_limey who wrote (8347)6/17/2019 2:12:05 PM
From: J.F. Sebastian
1 Recommendation   of 9971
 
A better question would be why did Apple pay twice that for Beats Electronics? Have they even made back their investment on that one yet? You have to sell a lot of headphones to make up for $3 billion, even when their headphones cost $300 a pop.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: clochard who wrote (8345)6/17/2019 2:29:38 PM
From: J.F. Sebastian
   of 9971
 
Again, another complete non sequitur. Are you and limey related? The same person perhaps?

When challenged about something you've stated but can't prove or provide supporting evidence, you simply change the subject. That is the mark of a troll.

Limey has done it countless times over the years, so much so that I automatically discount anything he writes because he seldom provides links for his assertions. They're just his crazy, heavily biased, anti-Apple opinions. As such, I don't respect his ideas much.

I've not known you to do the same, continuously make outlandish statements without backing them up. Unlike limey and sylvester, you aren't even banned from the main Apple thread, but you haven't posted there in 2-1/2 years and choose to post here instead.

It's up to you to decide the type of SI participant you want to me. Choose wisely.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: lucky_limey6/17/2019 8:24:43 PM
1 Recommendation   of 9971
 
Steve Jobs - pre fanboy days. When Apple was REAL... enjoy... this used to be what it was all about.



Frank, honest and open!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10