| To: Kiwi Pom who wrote (1054) | 11/30/2021 3:30:48 PM | | From: mark_ikn | | | | PKF Littlejohn, the contact box yes. They decided that is the way for 3rd parties to contact them, therefore the "reasonable man" (legal term) assumes anything sent via their preferred channel is both read and understood.
Put simply, they cannot claim ignorance or try to fob us off by saying any messages we write in were unread. Therefore, report Minera IRL's IAS24 dereliction to them and they as annual auditors must act.
|
| | Minera IRL | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| To: mark_ikn who wrote (1055) | 11/30/2021 3:39:29 PM | | From: andrewlong | | | | to Kiwi Pom
yes contact box
but also send to David Thompson at. dthompson@pkf-l.com as he signed off the last two years of Annual Reports.
andrewlong |
| | Minera IRL | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| From: waznot | 11/30/2021 3:41:58 PM | | | | | | It has been easier this round to submit complaints etc. as it deals mainly with the issue of not declaring Related Party Transactions.
I was able to submit to CSC, Rio Tinto, and auditor PKF
It was with great pleasure to submit complaints through the companies whistleblower hotline hotline. I got carried away and submitted three:
1. A complaint about why there was no declaration as to related parties.
2. Why the company Barker Tilley did not pick up on the missed declarations as to related party transactions.
3. Why did MIRL pick the same firm, Barker Tilly as it did in 2016. Was it the same individual staff at Barker Tilley in 2001 and 2016.
waznot |
| | Minera IRL | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| From: waznot | 11/30/2021 3:58:55 PM | | | | | | As it relates to the Ontario Securities Commission I received this email from them as to the correct Principle Regulator. For your information
waznot
From: whistleblower <whistleblower@osc.gov.on.ca>
Date: November 29, 2021 at 10:23:44 AM EST
To:
Subject: Confidential: Ontario Securities Commission (ref. 346-388 and 750-831)
Dear Mr. Zaverucha,
Thank you for making submissions (346-388 and 750-831 on November 9 and 25, 2021, respectively) to the Office of the Whistleblower of the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC). We note that the subject entity, Minera IRL Limited, you identified in your submission has the British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC) as its principal regulator. The Canadian securities regulatory landscape is made up of each province containing their own securities regulatory authority responsible for regulating the securities industry in their own province. As such, the misconduct that you allege appears to fall within the jurisdiction of the BCSC to review. We encourage you to contact the BCSC directly to report the misconduct you allege in your submission. To that end, I am including herein a link to the BCSC's "Contact Us" page which also provides the ability to report a concern under the heading "Complaints or Concerns": bcsc.bc.ca
Thank you again for your submissions to the OSC's Whistleblower Program.
OSC Office of the Whistleblower
Ontario Securities Commission
20 Queen Street West, 20th Floor | Toronto ON M5H 3S8
Whistleblower-only Hotline: 1-888-672-5553)
www.officeofthewhistleblower.ca |
| | Minera IRL | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| To: GermanyBoy who wrote (1021) | 12/1/2021 7:25:27 AM | | From: Breft | | | | This is pathetic German Boy. You are not fooling anyone here.
It is a serious accusation you make regarding Mark making death threats, of which there is no evidence whatsoever.
What there is evidence of, is that the CEO, board members, potential board member Mount, and other sundry apparatchiks at Minera are obfuscating and avoiding answering awkward questions, and they must be held to account. I for one am 100% behind Mark and the CS group, so I suggest you remove yourself from this board as you have no credibility. No offence! |
| | Minera IRL | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| To: Karl_M who wrote (1029) | 12/1/2021 9:27:26 AM | | From: Breft | | | | | There is a simple answer for Mr Mount. Pick the phone up, and answer the questions coming from the other end like a professional. |
| | Minera IRL | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| To: jiggaAu who wrote (1044) | 12/1/2021 9:40:08 AM | | From: Breft | | | | I'm sorry, I'm not convinced. Some time ago I emailed Benevides to ask him if he had a programme detailing the financing and development of the Ollachea project, and also when I might expect MIRL to refloat on the UK AIM market. I got no reply, but after sending a reminder email, I got a reply from Pedro Valdez, which provided no answers but asked for patience. Clearly not good enough by far.
If MIRL do not have a basic document like a programme by which progress can be measured, it tells me there is something seriously wrong, and that the management is grossly incompetent.
It is time the swamp here was drained, and the CS group must see it through if we are to have any chance of seeing a return on our investment. |
| | Minera IRL | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| |
