We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Gold/Mining/EnergyMinera IRL

Previous 10 Next 10 
From: mark_ikn11/24/2021 11:43:31 PM
3 Recommendations   of 1289
Here is the WhatsApp message I sent to Martin Mount this morning. The only change I have made is to scrub out his photo (at this stage, unfair to him I believe). I added the letter "P" next to his name for "phone". The text messages sent to him were of a similar ilk and I can show them, if required. I'm not the one with things to hide, Game Boy.

Please explain how this is a "felony", Game Boy:

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: ian.s11/25/2021 4:18:32 AM
1 Recommendation   of 1289
Get lost GermanyBoy. You are a joke.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: Alias6311/25/2021 11:58:08 AM
1 Recommendation   of 1289
I believe the report will be published before the AGM. I also believe that the report will only contain minor wrongdoings of DB. In the end - I believe - the report is going to legally acquit DB of the accusations. Is anyone expecting anything else?

This still leaves us shareholders with the devastating performance of the company, which for me is the main reason to vote against the current mgmt. I still havent read or came up with a better idea than scorched earth.

I also believe that MIRL has shifted their strategy for Ollachea: they no longer intend to build it but they are looking for a M&A-deal.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: mark_ikn11/25/2021 2:58:59 PM
2 Recommendations   of 1289
I'd like to remind the CS group that we presume innocence of Mr Martin Mount. In fact, the only poster making wild accusations on this board is GermanyBoy (aka Benavides and his pinche Valdez) and his "felony" claptrap. Hardly the first time his desperation has shown, GermanyBoy is the same handle that claimed to be an ace investigator, then took private information from mails sent into Minera IRL by Walter Zaverucha, posted it on this public board and accused him of being a land-trafficker at the same time (without a shred of evidence), all while confusing him with a different poster, "andrewlong". And GermanyBoy still hasn't explained how he got Mr. Z's name and private information. Nice person! Great DD!

Worth pointing out that I also have ample proof that Pedro Valdez illegally spied on my personal WhatsApp activity. Valdez still refuses to say a word about that, but has managed to keep his job at Minera IRL.

So we continue to allow Martin Mount the assumption of innocence, until such time as he enters into conversation and hears the CS side of the story. He is over 18 years old and at that point, he can make his own decisions but if I were Mount, I'd at least want to hear the other side of the story before continuing with this nomination for director. I will, therefore, continue to reach out to him.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

To: Kiwi Pom who wrote (987)11/26/2021 9:55:53 AM
From: mark_ikn
6 Recommendations   of 1289
Without going into details (in this case, no free info for the liar Benavides), correspondence with shareholders this week has confirmed Rio Tinto (RTZ) is taking our whistleblower submissions seriously. I'd therefore encourage other CS members to use the channels provided by Kiwi Pom in his post (#987 below, this post being a reply to his), this really is a case of the more the merrier. Also, a couple of shareholders have taken up the cause with the company auditors, the UK-based Davidson, including one shareholder with control of many millions of shares (thanks, you know who you are). While feedback is less likely from Davidson, it's to our advantage they know how many eyeballs are watching them (and UK accountancy laws are not something that firm will want to knowingly infringe).

We're now in the period when action is most likely to produce results. Though we're all tired of this company and its entrenched board I'd encourage all shareholders, large or small, to help with the efforts and make their own denouncement of Minera IRL. A shareholder of one share has the same rights as a shareholder of 10m shares and all voices matter.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)

To: mark_ikn who wrote (1027)11/26/2021 12:21:24 PM
From: Sredna5
2 Recommendations   of 1289
Thank you Mark for all your effort! I have used the Rio Tinto whistleblower function.

It is very telling that the board cannot deny the claims we CS have put forward. Not even after three months of investigation. As I wrote above, they must be agonizing over how to handle the truth. Also, they cannot produce a timeline for the development of Ollachea. Any other mining company out there which cannot provide a timeline on its own webpage for the development of its flagship asset?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

From: Karl_M11/26/2021 1:06:57 PM
1 Recommendation   of 1289
Martin Mount is an old friend of mine and I have something to say about the harassment of him and his family.

Mark Turner announced a few days ago that he approached Martin Mount, and then continued to call and text Martin while also threatening to start proceedings with the UK embassy.

Any stalking, harassment or threats are considered a criminal offence worldwide, and are completely unacceptable irrespective of the purpose of this collective. This seems to be evidence of someone who is unhinged, and who is now targeting people outside the corporate issues discussed in this forum. This needs to stop. I had to make this public before it escalates, and to prevent further harm being caused to third parties that have nothing to do with the accusations or low share values.

Please see below the message from Martin Mount’s wife, who was a victim to Mark’s attacks just recently. Mark stated yesterday that he visited Martin’s place, but he failed to mention that he stood in front of Martin’s house screaming his name and terrorizing the entire neighbourhood. Mark has also publicly shared Martin’s phone number in an attempt to convince the users of this forum to contact him and extend the harassment. To what end?

Here's the message I am referring. I have erased the sections that point to the personal information of the parties involved:

Here’s the translation:

What worries me is that this guy whose name is Mark T has gone to the neighbourhood today and managed to break in when Ivan was at the other end. He was screaming and calling you by your name and didn’t want to leave and was also taking photos of the house. Our neighbour told him that she was going to call the Police, but he seemed not to care. Breaking in is an offense and to take photos puts us in danger. I have the camera videos. I’ve been told he is not so old and very tall, like 1.90 and a foreigner. Is there someone you can talk in the mine to make them aware and see what we can do? Because he has your address and telephone number. I don’t know how he got them. Do you have his name or his address so we can file a report? I think he will come back many times; he thinks you're hiding inside.

Mark has also posted images of some of the more civil messages he sent to Martin, but he did not mention that he started screaming over the phone to Martin’s wife while she was trying to explain that Martin is out of the country.

This situation is unacceptable and should not be tolerated. To anyone who is close to Mark Turner PLEASE request that this aggressive behaviour stops, his family should be kept away from this mess.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (4)

To: Karl_M who wrote (1029)11/26/2021 1:35:56 PM
From: Kiwi Pom
5 Recommendations   of 1289
Oh dear - we really are being taken as being fools by the joke of a mining company.

Karl_m - if you really are an old friend of Mr Mount, I pose the following

1. Why did Mr Mount not make these accusations personally?

2. If Mr Mount wants the support of this group, why is he refusing to answer valid concerns posed by members of this group?

3. You are making serious accusations whilst hiding behind the cloak of anonimity - clear this mess up and get Mr Mount to COMMUNICATE with the members of the concerned shareholder group.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: Karl_M who wrote (1029)11/26/2021 2:29:05 PM
From: andrewlong
1 Recommendation   of 1289
Following along the lines of comments by poster Kiwi Pom.

Why did you not contact Martin Mount (or did your so called 'friend' contact you to sign up to Silicon Investor and put out some verbiage).

Reference is made to approximate height of Mark T of 1.9 meters which equates to approximately 6.23 feet. I have seen pictures of Mark T and by stature he is not a 'giant' in height, I would say more around 5.6 feet (1.706 m), in my view he is 'short' in stature.

Did his wife contact you?

As a friend of Martin, I would suggest you consider giving him sound advice.

Apparently, when the meeting agenda (annual meeting) was made public Mark contacted Martin Mount, they had a brief conversation as the potential issues that Martin may face if elected as Director. Mark tried to contact Martin a second time, Martin it appears refused to speak to Mark a second time. A normal individual would have spoken to Mark the second time and then could conclude with "Mark, do not contact me anymore until the voting is completed". But in my view I think that someone from the Company (after the first contact) told (or scolded him) for talking to Mark and was advised (told) not to speak to Mark in the future.

If the above paragraph is partially correct then I am asking myself: 'is the proposed nominee of Martin Mount for Director truly 'independent ' '


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: Kiwi Pom who wrote (1030)11/26/2021 3:01:45 PM
From: Sredna5
3 Recommendations   of 1289
This is very symptomatic. These people always attack the person Mark and his character but they never ever provide any answers to his or our questions to the company. It is very easy to see that this is their strategy. Silence on factual matters and smearing of the person Mark.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10