SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Gold/Mining/EnergyMinera IRL


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Gib Bogle who wrote (993)11/22/2021 7:54:26 PM
From: Turtle_named_mack
3 Recommendations   of 1264
 
Search with the term "How to spy on a whatsapp number".

Fascinating!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: andrewlong11/22/2021 9:00:33 PM
1 Recommendation   of 1264
 
Yes, it is a fair question from Gib Bogle to Mark and ended up in a very decent conversation.

Given the current state of this particular incident, being silent on some aspects is good.
Sometimes a Private Message may be an avenue of communication.

The point I am making is that back in August there was a general understanding that we CS would be transparent. The bad 'guys' knew every move we were about to do etc.

Mark is the main target. What is happening to him (and his suggestion to us) can happen to anyone. So our guards are up. But also shows how low these 'guys' will stoop to make themselves look good.

andrewlong

p.s. note to bad guys, I am going to the bathroom, I will be back soon, do not take your eyes off the screen.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: waznot11/23/2021 12:52:04 AM
1 Recommendation   of 1264
 
Mark, sorry to hear of the spying on your third-party app. You are right to take actions as you have stated.

I think you are correct as to the person that could be spying on you as:

1) Posts from GermanyBoy:
2) Post 837 – “founder of an IT and digital research company in Canada”;
3) Post 934 – “close to Andrew Long, I will reveal his true identity”;
4) Post 948 – “ I love investigation “;
5) Post 954 – “Five years ago, my Development Manager”

Of course, first read of the above is that it is B. S. On second read it is still B.S. but now he is bragging. Above is an indication of a connection between GBoy and the ‘spy’.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: idamexusa11/23/2021 8:10:30 AM
2 Recommendations   of 1264
 
Electronic proxy received last night and voted this morning. Good luck to the CS Group.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: idamexusa who wrote (1004)11/23/2021 9:41:52 AM
From: JGCGI
2 Recommendations   of 1264
 
As a concerned shareholder do I just vote against all 5 items? Will someone be keeping track of our votes? If so, how do we report our share count and votes? Sorry to put the burden on someone else. I do appreciate everyone's work in trying to do the right thing here.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


From: DaveAu11/23/2021 10:18:21 AM
1 Recommendation   of 1264
 
Is anyone attending? I don't like to appoint "Gerardo Pervez, Diego Benavides" as my proxy but unless I have another name, that's my only choice (using ProxyVote.com).

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: JGCGI who wrote (1005)11/23/2021 10:20:39 AM
From: andrewlong
1 Recommendation   of 1264
 
Can I suggest we all hold off from submission of our votes, we have a few weeks.

Initially, I was going 'against' all items, still may do so, but with the new proposed director of Martin Mount, maybe I will vote for him. I do not know enough about Mr. Mount as yet.

Your suggestion of 'keeping track' is interesting. As far as I understand Mark received and created a list of CS and the amount of shares for each ( to get to that approx 30 million).

First, if anyone else has idea, please share.
Second, I think Mark will respond with ideas (he is dealing with some serious stuff now), we will eventually read his thoughts.

Original strategy was to vote out Benavides, still is.

Our actions going forward:
1) vote against everything, or
2) vote against all except 'yes' for Mount

we have the time before final voting

andrewlong

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: DaveAu who wrote (1006)11/23/2021 10:24:34 AM
From: andrewlong
1 Recommendation   of 1264
 
just heading out the door.

Off the top of my mind, can that part of the proxy be left blank. (I think so ??)
Anyone else ?

a

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: ian.s11/23/2021 2:22:42 PM
2 Recommendations   of 1264
 
The share price is at a 52 week low. Well done Diego.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: mark_ikn11/23/2021 11:25:23 PM
6 Recommendations   of 1264
 
How are shareholders supposed to make an informed decision on the AGM without knowing the results of the internal inquiry? The directors said they were investigating and that the company uses SAP, the results of financial movements would normally have been known to them within days (at worst)). Instead, September, October and most of November have passed and we still don't know anything, not even a brief summary of their findings. In order to vote correctly, we should have information on this issue.

After all, they want us to re-appoint the person under investigation and now voting has already opened. There's a clear fiduciary duty to complete here, how are we supposed to vote if we are left without key information?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)
Previous 10 Next 10