To: Steady_on who wrote (660) | 8/25/2014 7:49:53 PM | From: SteveF | | | Do you still blame message board posters? Do you care who got the millions of dollars of shareholder funds (i.e. your money) that's missing today?
I'm sure Bordy thanks you even though he stopped responding to emails and phone calls months ago. |
| JBII - The Secret Catalyst Turns Plastics into Oil | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
From: zardiw | 9/4/2014 11:00:28 AM | | | | Sleazy Court Tactics on PTOI:
So Seneca files this motion stating the company is out of money....blah blah blah.....And what is his motive pray tell?
Why to scare any potential investors of course, and to drive the SP down............and WHY does he do that?
Cause his blackmailing attempts FAILED.
What a sleaze ball.
Now here's some actual documentation to prove this:
Response to so called Discovery papers that were NEVER SENT.
2. On July 30, 2014, I received an email from Plaintiff's counsel, Rebecca Fuller, transmitting Plaintiffs request for production, request for admissions, and first set of interrogatories. (A copy of that email is attached to Plaintiff's motion [D.E. 33-5]) This was the first time I, or anyone else at Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., learned that Plaintiff had issued written discovery in this matter. 3. As a result, on July 31, 2014, I caused to be reviewed every fax transmission received by Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A.'s Miami office on June 26, 2014, which are maintained on Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A.'s network, and can confirm that no fax was received from or on behalf of Plaintiff on June 26, 2014. (Due to the sensitivity of the June 26, 2014 faxes reviewed, they are not attached to this declaration.)
4. I also caused to be reviewed the electronic file maintained for this matter, and can confirm that Plaintiff s June 26, 2014 discovery requests were also not received at Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A.'s Miami office by U.S. mail. It is Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A.'s regular Case 0:13-cv-61809-RLR Document 35-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2014 Page 1 of 2 business practice to image all incoming mail and load it to the corresponding electronic file. Based on my understanding of this business practice, the absence of any record from the electronic file indicates that the discovery requests had not been received by U.S. mail. 5. In fact, as of the date this declaration is being signed, neither I nor anyone else at Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. have ever received Plaintiff's discovery requests by fax or U.S. mail. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct based on information in my possession and information provided to me.
LYING response of attys that 'supposedly' sent these Discovery Papers.....
My question is....instead of 'recovering the transmission reports'........why didn't they just INCLUDE them in this response?
You know why they're not included.............cause they DO NOT EXIST:
While we are certain that the discovery requests in question were sent to your office on June 26, 2014, and are recovering the transmission reports to indicate the same, we are willing to agree to an additional 30 days to respond, until August 30, 2014; provided, however, that we will schedule mediation in this matter for mid-September of 2014.
z |
| JBII - The Secret Catalyst Turns Plastics into Oil | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: Reseller Mike who wrote (685) | 9/4/2014 1:46:59 PM | From: Rawnoc | | | Doubtful. We're talking about an attorney's office that said it didn't receive the fax. What are the odds that the attorney's office is lying AND it can be proven it is lying?
A receipt on the sender's end of a Fax isn't good enough. Most faxes are electronic these days anyway and any number of things could have gone wrong. I speak from frustrating experience how many times I've had to resend electronic faxes and vice-versa. You should ALWAYS follow up with a phone call and verify receipt of the fax. It's a pretty simple procedure that two attorney firms are more than capable of doing. If that wasn't done, the Plantiff is attempting to play dirty and it won't fly.
But what do I know....I only called every legal thing accurately from day 1.
I'll take a biscuit. |
| JBII - The Secret Catalyst Turns Plastics into Oil | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
To: Reseller Mike who wrote (685) | 9/4/2014 2:04:04 PM | From: Rawnoc | | | I just saw this on pacer: ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov
The attorney signed under penalty of perjury that he didn't receive the Fax until July 31. I doubt the lawyer would take that huge of a risk and lie to a judge under penalty of perjury and risk jail time. Furthermore, even if he did lie (yeah right), the odds of proving he lied are astronomically low.
Finally, since it's been 30 days from July 31 anyway, who gives a shit? As long as the attorney has already filed the necessary responses by the time the judge rules next, the judge won't give a shit at the attempt to nitpick let alone prove the nitpick is even valid.
If this is the bow-wow crow, it's not looking too good for Seneca. |
| JBII - The Secret Catalyst Turns Plastics into Oil | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
From: algood40258 | 11/20/2014 3:30:28 PM | | | | ih.advfn.com
Current Report Filing (8-k) | Date : | 11/20/2014 @ 11:29AM | Source : | Edgar (US Regulatory) | Stock : | Plastic2oil, Inc. (QB) (PTOI) | Quote : | 0.068 0.006 (9.68%) @ 3:05PM
|
|
| JBII - The Secret Catalyst Turns Plastics into Oil | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| |