SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Technology StocksApple Tankwatch


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Jon Koplik who wrote (32641)3/25/2025 11:53:03 AM
From: zax
   of 32660
 

Exclusive: Apple is set to stave off a possible fine and an EU order over its browser options on iPhones after it made changes to comply with landmark EU rules aimed at reining in Big Tech, people with direct knowledge of the matter said reut.rs/4iZAO8K

Reuters (@reuters.com) 2025-03-25T13:22:39.670Z

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: zax3/26/2025 5:01:42 PM
1 Recommendation   of 32660
 
Apple Barred From Google Antitrust Trial, $20 Billion Search Deal at Risk

apple.slashdot.org

A U.S. appeals court has ruled that Apple cannot participate in Google's upcoming antitrust trial, potentially jeopardizing a $20 billion annual deal between the tech giants. The DC Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that Apple waited too long to join the proceedings, filing its request 33 days after the government proposed remedies in the case Google lost last August.

"The delay seems difficult to justify," the judges ruled. While Apple can still submit written testimony and file friend-of-court briefs, it cannot present evidence or cross-examine witnesses as it had sought. At stake is Google's practice of paying Apple approximately $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine in Safari browsers across Apple devices. The government's proposed remedies would make such arrangements impermissible.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: zuzahafty3/31/2025 7:46:46 AM
1 Recommendation   of 32660
 
I will always choose Apple because it produces easy-to-use technology

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: zuzahafty who wrote (32644)4/1/2025 12:11:13 PM
From: zax
   of 32660
 
Welcome to the board, and to SI, zuzahafty.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: zax4/4/2025 2:11:58 PM
   of 32660
 
Expert warns of 'economic Armageddon,' $3,500 iPhones from tariffs

finance.yahoo.com



One of Wall Street's most unrelenting tech bulls now sees "dark days" ahead for the tech trade as the reality of expansive new tariffs sets in. It's a sign that as times change, people do too, Yahoo Finance's Myles Udland wrote.

"The concept of taking the US back to the 1980's 'manufacturing days' with these tariffs is a bad science experiment that in the process will cause an economic Armageddon in our view and crush the tech trade, AI Revolution theme, and overall industry in the process," Wedbush analyst Dan Ives wrote in a note to clients on Friday.

Ives offered another warning about the economic pain that these tariffs could bring to US consumers: He noted that the cost of an Apple ( AAPL) iPhone might triple.

"50% China tariffs, 32% Taiwan tariffs would essentially cause a shut-off valve from the US tech landscape and in the process cause every electronic to go up 40%-50% for consumers, iPhones made in the US would cost $3,500 (vs. $1,000), and the AI Revolution trade would be significantly slowed down by these head scratching tariffs that NEED to be negotiated to realistic levels." (Emphasis added.)

... finance.yahoo.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: zax4/7/2025 2:27:17 PM
   of 32660
 

(WSJ) - Apple plans to send more iPhones to the U.S. from India to offset the high cost of China tariffs, people familiar with the matter said. @wsj.com $AAPL www.wsj.com/tech/apple-i...

Carl Quintanilla (@carlquintanilla.bsky.social) 2025-04-07T18:22:50.996Z

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: zax4/7/2025 4:41:35 PM
   of 32660
 
Apple’s collapse proves cosying up to Trump is no guarantee of safety

The big tech giant’s close relationship with the president has failed to protect it from trade war chaos

telegraph.co.uk



For years, Tim Cook has become something of a horse-whisperer figure in his dealings with Donald Trump.

“Tim Cook calls Donald Trump directly,” the US president said of Apple’s chief executive during his first term in 2019, speaking in the third person.

“That’s why he’s a great executive. Because he calls me and others don’t.” Other bosses, he said, “go out and hire very expensive consultants”.

Despite Trump being deeply unpopular with much of Apple’s Silicon Valley workforce, Cook – a seasoned corporate diplomat – maintained a warm relationship with him, steadily navigating the White House’s choppy trade war against China.

His lobbying was crucial to Apple securing exemptions for billions of dollars in imports of Chinese-made smartwatches and other components. Trump, meanwhile, claimed to have brought Apple manufacturing back to the US when he toured a Mac computer factory in Texas (the factory had been open since 2013, but Apple did not correct the president).

But on Wednesday, Cook’s delicate manoeuvres seemed to hit a brick wall.

Trump imposed crushing tariffs not only on China, where the majority of Apple’s iPhones are made, but also on countries such as Vietnam and India, where Cook has quietly moved parts of its production in recent years in anticipation of further Chinese tensions.

Trump’s tariffs could lead to the price of an iPhone rising by up to 43pc, according to analysts at Rosenblatt Securities. The most expensive iPhone 16 Pro Max would cost around $2,300 (£1,773), up from $1,599 today, while the cheapest would cost $1,142, up from $799.

</snip> Read the rest here: telegraph.co.uk

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: zax4/12/2025 8:42:52 AM
1 Recommendation   of 32660
 

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: zax who wrote (32649)4/13/2025 3:25:21 PM
From: manning18
   of 32660
 
HE BETTER FIGURE OUT A FASTER WAY TO DIVERSIFY

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: manning18 who wrote (32650)4/13/2025 3:47:16 PM
From: zax
   of 32660
 
I don't think India will have the capacity any time soon.

Was this the goal?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10