| To: Joe NYC who wrote (42939) | 9/23/2021 12:15:45 PM | | From: neolib | | | | They have GPUs going into mobile SoCs at Samsung. But Samsung has little footprint outside of themselves, whereas MediaTek does. If there is anything to this rumor, I suspect its about GPUs for MediaTek.
Which makes me wonder what if any limitations AMD had in order to land Samsung.
If AMD can get MediaTek, that basically leaves Qualcomm as the only big provider that would not be on AMD GPUs, other than captive Apple. |
| | AMD, ARMH, INTC, NVDA | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| To: neolib who wrote (42940) | 9/23/2021 1:39:05 PM | | From: Joe NYC | | | | | That would be an excellent way to for AMD to get the foot in the door. MediaTek covers a lot of the market, and them being on TSMC would probably make thinks even easier than Samsung, |
| | AMD, ARMH, INTC, NVDA | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| From: gvatty | 9/23/2021 3:18:00 PM | | | | | | | Why didn't Microsoft use AMD for their new Surface models? I thought it's prior 1 AMD model was among the better choices. |
| | AMD, ARMH, INTC, NVDA | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2) |
|
| To: gvatty who wrote (42945) | 9/23/2021 3:29:33 PM | | From: Joe NYC | | | | | It's strange that Microsoft did not pick up Cezanne chip, but used prior generations... |
| | AMD, ARMH, INTC, NVDA | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | KeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| |
