We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon
Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Have you suggested the same thing to Watson? I don't know the guy but for 20 years he's been trashing me ....I don't know what his problem is but I won't sit still for the trashing and the lies...... You can google me and get my record, not so with him.
But a larger display is not the biggest change Mircosoft is making to the Surface Laptop line. The German tech blog also reports that the 15-inch version of the Surface Laptop 3 will feature an AMD Ryzen processor! This is a big win for Intel’s rival.
So far, three AMD-based models of the 15-inch Surface Laptop 3 have been discovered but the exact chipset powering them are still unknown. There are speculations they may be powered by the Ryzen 3000 series (Ryzen 5 3550H and Ryzen 7 3750H) which powers Honor’s MagicBook Pro Ryzen Edition which was announced early this month.
There is no mention of the 13.5-inch model getting AMD processors, so expect an Intel sticker on that model.
The 15-inch Surface Laptop 3 is rumored to also come with a 4K display with Surface Pen support. We also expect it to have a USB-C port this time.
"Given how dominant Nvidia currently is in the AI training accelerator market, and given how large its chip and software investments in the space remain, it would be a mistake to assume that Cerebras, Intel (INTC - Get Report) or Huawei -- or for that matter, other rivals such as AMD (AMD - Get Report) and Google (GOOGL - Get Report) -- will cause major share losses in the near-term," TheStreet tech columnist Eric Jhonsa wrote last month. "However, at a time when Nvidia's flagship offering is more than 24 months old, their progress is definitely worth keeping an eye on."
> I think they had AMD at like 795 or so and Intel below 750, but don't recall the exact numbers.
Intel ASP is low because they sell a lot of Atom based CPUs, Xeon D and Bronze, which drive down the average. AMD doesn't compete in that area.
> in that some independent stat outfit claimed AMD's 4Q18 was more like 3-3.5% and when coupled with their $115M that gives an ASP in about the right place. Hmm... I don't know about that. It's also possible that the analyst, or stats outfit simply made a mistake
Anyways, whatever the ASP of Naples was, the ASP of Rome is going to be a lot higher
> That would be actual info. What they give instead leaves everyone guessing.
Unfortunately, that is deliberate. They feed they info in such a way to make it hard as possible to guess what the ASP and sales figures are.