SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Microcap & Penny StocksMicrocap Kitchen Canadian Stocks


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: JRod77 who wrote (49290)12/10/2020 9:08:06 PM
From: ciao888
   of 49332
 
Is this the old TS Telecom from 2000? With a stock ticker of TOM? Website doesn't look investor friendly at all.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: ciao888 who wrote (49297)12/11/2020 8:39:58 AM
From: JRod77
   of 49332
 
Not too sure if it is. That's what I was surprised about. How can a tech company have such an old website, but a growing technology based business. Doesn't have to be a work of art, but come on, lol. But their balance sheet and growth is decent, regardless.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: JRod77 who wrote (49298)12/11/2020 10:17:39 AM
From: ciao888
   of 49332
 
That website is a total embarrassment. You can't even find NR / financials or an investor presentation. Not investable.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: ciao888 who wrote (49299)12/11/2020 4:11:36 PM
From: JRod77
   of 49332
 
Website is irrelevant in the grand scheme. Show me the company makes money, that's what really matters. Too many investors get tricked because of a fancy new website and I agree it's got some importance. But I've also seen companies where they spent tens of thousands on some modern site and they can't make a buck to save their company. I would rather be in company that can show me every 90 days it's balance sheet is getting stronger than some keeping up with the Jones' site. Financials you can get on Sedar, Stockwatch, etc.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: JRod77 who wrote (49300)12/11/2020 4:50:46 PM
From: ciao888
   of 49332
 
Company makes it hard to evaluate it's business if info is not presented on their website. Their website is far from being user friendly for an investor and it looks like something from the early 1980's. If a tech company cannot take the effort to update their site, I won't be able to take them seriously. If they had a below average website and was spewing out great numbers, I would be interested. Went to Sedar to look at last financials, nothing impressive. Stock barely trades. Much better stocks out there.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: ciao888 who wrote (49301)12/11/2020 11:00:34 PM
From: JRod77
   of 49332
 

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: kidl who wrote (49270)12/18/2020 1:34:22 PM
From: kidl
   of 49332
 

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Rocket Red who wrote (24450)12/22/2020 10:05:38 PM
From: Goose94
   of 49332
 
Silver Cowboy IPO

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: Dick Martin12/22/2020 11:48:28 PM
   of 49332
 
sbm.v --is an opportunity at these prices, looking for major gains n the New Year. From Twitter:

Sirona Biochem

@SironaBiochem

We are pleased to announce that WuXi AppTec is close to completing production of the first batch of TFC-1067 and will be ready to ship early 2021. The large-scale production in China has thus started - see also: t.co

#skincare #cosmetics #biotechnology

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: 6furlongs who wrote (49284)12/23/2020 12:01:09 AM
From: pocotrader
   of 49332
 
6furlongs hadn't seen you around for a long time, stock picking contest is on if you want in
Subject 60188

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10