We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   PoliticsManmade Global Warming, A hoax? A Scam? or a Doomsday Cult?

Previous 10 
From: i-node11/25/2017 2:33:27 PM
1 Recommendation   of 4325
What Would Robert K. Merton Say About Scientists who Sue?

Interesting article to me as I've been reading about the great physicists around late 1800s-early 1900s and their quests to deal with the wave/particle duality. And it has struck me on multiple occasions that these greats disagreed about fundamental ideas yet were able to use those disagreements to further the science.

Hard to imagine some of these half-scientist/half-jokers doing that today.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: Thomas A Watson1/10/2019 12:50:54 PM
   of 4325
An interesting article on the science of astrology, whoops I mean on the science of Climate Models.

A Sea-Surface Temperature Picture Worth a Few Hundred Words!
Anthony Watts / 18 hours ago January 9, 2019

We covered this paper when it was first released, here is some commentary on it – Anthony

Guest essay by By PATRICK J. MICHAELS

On January 7 a paper by Veronika Eyring and 28 coauthors, titled “Taking Climate Model Evaluation to the Next Level” appeared in Nature Climate Change, Nature’s journal devoted exclusively to this one obviously under-researched subject.

For years, you dear readers have been subject to our railing about the unscientific way in which we forecast this century’s climate: we take 29 groups of models and average them. Anyone, we repeatedly point out, who knows weather forecasting realizes that such an activity is foolhardy. Some models are better than others in certain situations, and others may perform better under different conditions. Consequently, the daily forecast is usually a blend of a subset of available models, or, perhaps (as can be the case for winter storms) only one might be relied upon.

Finally the modelling community (as represented by the football team of authors) gets it. The second sentence of the paper’s abstract says “there is now evidence that giving equal weight to each available model projection is suboptimal.”

A map of sea-surface temperature errors calculated when all the models are averaged up shows the problem writ large:

Annual sea-surface temperature error (modelled minus observed) averaged over the current family of climate models. From Eyring et al.

First, the integrated “redness” of the map appears to be a bit larger than the integrated “blueness,” which would be consistent with the oft-repeated ( here) observation that the models are predicting more warming than is being observed. But, more important, the biggest errors are over some of the most climatically critical places on earth.

Start with the Southern Ocean. The models have almost the entire circumpolar sea too warm, much of it off more than 1.5°C. Down around 60°S (the bottom of the map) water temperatures get down to near 0°C (because of its salinity, sea water freezes at around -2.0°C). Making errors in this range means making errors in ice formation. Further, all the moisture that lies upon Antarctica originates in this ocean, and simulating an ocean 1.5° too warm is going to inject an enormous amount of nonexistent moisture into the atmosphere, which will be precipitated over the continent in nonexistent snow.

The problem is, down there, the models are making error about massive zones of whiteness, which by their nature absorb very little solar radiation. Where it’s not white, the surface warms up quicker.

(To appreciate that, sit outside on a sunny but calm winters day, changing your khakis from light to dark, the latter being much warmer)

There are two other error fields that merit special attention: the hot blobs off the coasts of western South America and Africa. These are regions where relatively cool water upwells to the surface, driven in large part by the trade winds that blow into the earth’s thermal equator. For not-completely known reasons, these sometimes slow or even reverse, upwelling is suppressed, and the warm anomaly known as El Nin~o emerges (there is a similar, but much more muted version that sometimes appears off Africa).

There’s a current theory that El Nin~os are one mechanism that contributes to atmospheric warming, which holds that the temperature tends to jump in steps that occur after each big one. It’s not hard to see that systematically creating these conditions more persistently than they occur could put more nonexistent warming into the forecast.

Finally, to beat ever more manfully on the dead horse—averaging up all the models and making a forecast—we again note that of all the models, one, the Russian INM-CM4 has actually tracked the observed climate quite well. It is by far the best of the lot. Eyring et al. also examined the models’ independence from each other—a measure of which are (and which are not) making (or not making) the same systematic errors. And amongst the most independent, not surprisingly, is INM-CM4.

(It’s update, INM-CM5, is slowly being leaked into the literature, but we don’t have the all-important climate sensitivity figures in print yet.)

The Eyring et al. study is a step forward. It brings climate model application into the 20th century.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (4321)4/27/2019 5:21:49 AM
From: sense
2 Recommendations   of 4325
You knew it was inevitable, right.... that climate change "science" would lead to this...

Oxford University professor claims aliens are already breeding with humans on earth

Alien hybrids will "save Earth from annihilation from climate change."

“It may be more or less assumed that the hybrid project is a response to this impending demise of human civilisation.”

No word yet on what gender the aliens identify as...

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: Carolyn8/7/2019 11:36:51 AM
4 Recommendations   of 4325
Carbon dioxide in perspective

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: Carolyn who wrote (4323)1/28/2020 6:46:19 AM
From: sense
   of 4325
Congress Now Funding "Controversial" Geoengineering 'Plan B' To Spray Particles In The Sky To Cool Earth
Chem trails finally coming out of the closet...

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: sense who wrote (4324)1/28/2020 8:19:59 AM
From: Carolyn
1 Recommendation   of 4325
Oh for heaven's sake! May all those particles fall on their homes and no one else's.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10