SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  For example, here is how to disable FireFox ad content blocking while on Silicon Investor.

   Biotech / MedicalImmunomedics (IMMU) - moderated


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: idahoranch1 who wrote (50203)2/8/2019 7:14:33 PM
From: stockdoc77
2 Recommendations   of 53128
 
My source for that was an analyst report put out around the time they filed for AA which quoted those numbers. Unfortunately, I did not save it, and don't remember which firm issued that report. Perhaps my memory is confused, but I did discuss that point in real time with some other investors, so I assume was reading it correctly. Maybe I should see if I have some old calendars or a yearbook that could refresh my recollection.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: idahoranch1 who wrote (50210)2/8/2019 7:16:55 PM
From: blessedtobehere
1 Recommendation   of 53128
 
>Not entirely true, the author of a post has 15 minutes to edit or erase their post. Thin thin Ice.

Well I think it probably is true because I just posted a message, went to edit and did not see an option to remove it. I could have erased all the text, but since the only option at the bottom is to submit, I believe it would still be there. And based on the fact that is all recent knowledge to me, I know that I never did that.
But you never bothered to ask.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: blessedtobehere who wrote (50212)2/8/2019 7:20:09 PM
From: jargonweary
   of 53128
 
“right now, my wife is going to take me out to one of my favorite restaurants.”

Perhaps you should consider an order of the humble pie for dinner tonight. You are pretty full of yourself.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: stockdoc77 who wrote (50211)2/8/2019 7:30:06 PM
From: blessedtobehere
   of 53128
 
> the actual fact that the FDA issued a CRL means they did not meet FDA standards

My intent is not to get in a pissing match with you, but let's think about that. Do you think that anytime a person is not given a job, a raise, a college admission, a job as a fireman, policeman.... I could go on and on and on and told they didn't meet the standards that it is indeed true? Tell that to minorities in the past who met standards. Tell that to whites in current times due to affirmative action. Tell that to women who applied to jobs traditionally held by men. Seriously? I'm trying hard right now to think of any job, approval, etc., that does not rely on the approvers to be unbiased.

Also, I thought you previously said that the FDA gets it right 99% of the time. Maybe you missed my previous post regarding their biggest blunders. You are correct, those were approvals and as I pointed out, all but 1 was big Pharma. Maybe you can enlighten us all and tell us why the FDA is more likely to make a mistake by approving a drug for Big Pharma.

And I won't even get into the Menthol cigarette controversy right now, which the FDA has not done anything to curb, even though it hurts the black population the most. I'm pretty sure some big tobacco companies and their lobbyists were involved, but I don't have time to look up facts right now. Maybe you can do that for me.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: jargonweary who wrote (50215)2/8/2019 7:32:03 PM
From: blessedtobehere
1 Recommendation   of 53128
 
I think I just apologized, but based Idaho's previous statement re: the ban, don't you now fall into the ban category?

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: blessedtobehere who wrote (50216)2/8/2019 7:34:51 PM
From: blessedtobehere
1 Recommendation   of 53128
 
Just going to add one more.
Look at LadyPI's original post to me which was not true but caused me to be banned and the posts just within the last hour to me. I believe I met the standards of conducts even though you might not agree with what I said, but you, LadyPI and jargon have not. Yet I got banned and you're still here.
See Idaho's post 50193.

Sometimes standards are not applied equally.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


From: jargonweary2/8/2019 7:48:05 PM
1 Recommendation   of 53128
 
For the record, I did ban myself for 2 weeks recently. I was being a bit of a jerk. I think I’ll ban myself again for a few days. This is getting all so tedious. And repetitive. And frustrating. And depressing.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: blessedtobehere who wrote (50216)2/8/2019 7:49:08 PM
From: stockdoc77
   of 53128
 
Because sometime in human history person A was unfair to person B, we can then conclude of course the FDA was unfair to IMMU as the only possible explanation for the CRL. Let me say your logic is less than overwhelming. You are engaging in conspiracy theory logic with a huge dose of motivated reasoning. I'm not going to follow you down that rabbit hole.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: stockdoc77 who wrote (50213)2/8/2019 8:51:07 PM
From: allatwwk
1 Recommendation   of 53128
 
fwiw, stockdoc, didn't see any reference to '38' in any of Morgan Stanley's IMMU blurbs. They only began coverage late last year.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


From: sukit2/8/2019 9:27:02 PM
9 Recommendations   of 53128
 
Bunch of grown ass men and women getting butt hurt by words on an internet forum. Everyone needs to grow the hell up. The mindless speculation, vilification and conspiracy theory bullshit is growing old and tired. Until the company or FDA gives us something definitive everything else is useless conjecture. What we know...

IMMU was issued a CRL from the FDA
The CRL related to CMC issues
The therapeutic benefits of 132 are significant and not related to the CRL

The company thought the issues were resolved adequate for approval
The FDA disagreed
The company will reapply
The FDA will reassess

We get it...you think Pehl is a lying piece of shit; the FDA is full of people on the take suppressing good medicine; and Behzad is an incompetent VC moron incapable of running a BOD let alone a real company. These point have all been made multiple times and yet we are no closer to the truth nor does any of this discourse give us any real trading or investment guidance.

This month has almost been as bad as the back slapping, high fiving that went on the week before the PDUFA date.


Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10