SVXA - Sovereign Exploration Associates International, Inc

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech SVXA - Sovereign Exploration Associates International, Inc

Previous 10

To: rrm_bcnu who wrote (58)	1/17/2006 4:17:30 PM
From: jmhollen	of 64

o/t: SPRU-SPRL, a 13:1. $0.0022 became 0.03, rose from there, never revisited under 0.05 again.... John :-) .

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: jmhollen who wrote (61)	1/19/2006 11:35:17 PM
From: stockster5	of 64

Oh sure, Hollen. That company actually had an income and a pe ratio. tb...,cali/svxp never even had a income.

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: stockster5 who wrote (62)	1/20/2006 12:05:34 AM
From: jmhollen	of 64

I believe you are mistaken. Strat Petroleum as SPRU was a new entity R/M'd into the old F2 Corp shell for the purpose of assimilating Eliese Corp (Private). To clean up SPRU's 1 Billion+ O/S, they did a 13:1 r/s that all the stockholders new about in advance. Hence, we all collected at 0.0022+/- like crazy. As of the R/S it became SPRL. I don't recall any real petro income until perhaps much later, when it bought some wells. The point is, all the SPRUvian longs did a lot of research on sucessful R/Ss at the time, and that one worked out OK. In general, I would agree with you that R/Ss suck..!!! I own no SVXP at this juncture, and would not buy any - too much old baggage. John :-) .

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: jmhollen who wrote (63)	1/22/2006 5:26:16 PM
From: stockster5	of 64

I sit corrected. I just assumed any other company may have income. Sxvp did announce, back in Oct 05, but made a vague comment about april 6 (0r 9th), I may be dyslectic... but then sprung it the first monday holiday after Christmas. Saying a future split will happen is one thing, putting a month and day in the sentence could be deceiving, by making shareholders think they may have months to play the stock. I SHOULD have seen the whole thing coming, as the parent company, Cali actually pulled the same thing before when cali was tddm or something.

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read