SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Non-TechSVXA - Sovereign Exploration Associates International, Inc


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: stockster5 who wrote (48)1/2/2006 10:27:48 PM
From: jmhollen
   of 64
 
Thanks for your input.

Please check your SI MAIL in the toolbar above. As a non-subscriber you won't be able to respond with a PM, but I hope you'll find the info useful.

John :-)

.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: jmhollen who wrote (50)1/7/2006 6:02:52 PM
From: stockster5
   of 64
 
I also think people should look at this
link:http://www.otcbb.com/asp/info_center.asp?symbol=SVXP ...
click 'filings' 8-k dated 10/27/05
Sub Document 2 page 1: Exchange ...
This is the language of agreement of a reverse split. Whats not too clear is, are they svxp common shares, cali common or all preferred. Either way, this may be a factor in how long we hold svxp. It is for me. Usually, we don't get much heads up with r/s's.
S5

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: creede who wrote (46)1/15/2006 8:09:05 PM
From: rrufff
   of 64
 
Reverse Split Tuesday 1/1000

otcbb.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: rrufff who wrote (52)1/16/2006 12:48:34 PM
From: creede
   of 64
 
I saw that on RB. Some as saying it's a good thing(probably a bagholder.lol). I just want to know how you knew it? Message 22020190 I thought that their O/S was about 2 mil....if the A/S is 250 billion, then why the r/s? Perhaps it is "the right kind of r/s". Thoughts anyone?

GB+ND
c

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: creede who wrote (53)1/16/2006 1:46:35 PM
From: rrufff
   of 64
 
I figured it would r/s with that o/s. I didn't know it actually was going to do it until I read it on IHub. My prior post was a guess, but it didn't take much to figure that out.

I'm out until after the r/s at least. This is not the 1st r/s.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: rrufff who wrote (54)1/16/2006 2:50:49 PM
From: creede
   of 64
 
Did you see the 1-E yet? Right on friday. sec.gov

I still just don't see why they would r/s now....since they could have sold so many more shares. Wierd.

GB+ND
c

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: creede who wrote (55)1/16/2006 6:09:14 PM
From: jmhollen
   of 64
 
Sounds like they may be needing some of their previous corporation's product: ammoniahold.com

A 1000:1 R/S is a pretty revealing admission that something is royally hosed.............
Company Notes:
Formerly=Key Waste Management, Inc. until 7-94
Formerly=Ammonia Hold, Inc. until 10-01
Formerly=TS&B Holdings, Inc. until 4-05
Formerly=CALI Holdings, Inc. until 10-05

:-)

.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: creede who wrote (55)1/16/2006 8:40:25 PM
From: rrufff
   of 64
 
Sovereign Exploration Associates International, Inc. Announces Reverse Stock Split to Improve Value by Positioning for Long Term Growth and Investor Value
Monday January 16, 9:50 am ET

NEWTOWN, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 16, 2006--Sovereign Exploration Associates International, Inc. (OTCBB: SVXP - News) announces a one-for-one, one thousand reverse (1:1000) stock split effective 9:00AM Eastern time, January 17, 2006.

Effective January 17, 2006, Sovereign Exploration Associates International, Inc.'s trading symbol will be changed to OTCBB: SVXA.

"This reverse stock split represents the next milestone in SVXP's overall plan to achieve maximum shareholder value," stated Robert Baca, CEO of SVXP. "On October 17, 2005, the Company completed a stock exchange agreement with CALI Holdings to position Sovereign Exploration Associates International, Inc. as a publicly traded company. The agreement requires that management execute a reverse split as part of the term of that agreement as stated in the 8-K dated October 17, 2005. We believe the new share price after the reverse split will improve the Company's position in the financial markets, and enhance its ability to attract individual and institutional investors to fund the expansion of the Company's multiple recovery operations."

Management has analyzed similar companies in the market, and feels the reverse split will allow for a more accurate market value of SVXP. Monies invested in SVXP will be primarily spent on recovering lost cargo, not searching for it. When compared to the market capitalization of comparable companies searching for potential wreck sites, management recognizes that SVXP has tremendous unrealized upside value, having already located 12 valuable ship wreck sites.

Curtis Sprouse, COO, further states "The reverse stock split paves the way for our Company to ultimately apply for listing on the American Stock Exchange (AMEX), and which will allow management to pursue more favorable funding mechanisms."

Each 1000 shares of SVXP common stock outstanding and held by each stockholder of the Company immediately prior to the effective time shall be reclassified and combined into one share of common stock automatically and without action by the holder. No fractional shares of common stock shall be issued as a result of such reclassification. In lieu of any fractional shares to which the stockholder would otherwise be entitled, the Company shall round up to the next highest share number. Following the reverse spit, the number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding will decrease to approximately 26,200,000.

About Sovereign Exploration Associates International, Inc.

Sovereign Exploration Associates International, Inc. (OTCBB:SVXP - News) is a Business Development Company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 undertaking shipwreck exploration and recovery initiatives. Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Security Exchange Act of 1934, SVXP has filed Form 8-K.

biz.yahoo.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: rrufff who wrote (54)1/16/2006 9:37:19 PM
From: rrm_bcnu
   of 64
 
I got out as well back when the Creede found the O/S increase. I've never seen a R/S/ that was good for a stock in the short term.

rrm

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: rrm_bcnu who wrote (58)1/16/2006 11:07:14 PM
From: stockster5
   of 64
 
An R/S is NEVER good for the common shareholder with under 10 million held. Then again, if you had 10 mill, you may not be a common shareholder. For us lowly 200k, 300k traders, R/S is instant death. It doesn't matter if the new stock sells for 2.00. With your new holding of 133 shares, you won't make back the commission.
I'm just surprised svxp didn't do a 1 for 25,000. Seen that before.
But, a sub-penny almost always stays a sub-penny. It's just the company officers that make the stock money. Thats how the game is played.
When Sprouse got involved and brought in his buddy cavar, (they're both from boston pharmaceutical company) that should have been my cue to cash in. Shame on me.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10