SVXA - Sovereign Exploration Associates International, Inc

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech SVXA - Sovereign Exploration Associates International, Inc

Previous 10 Next 10

To: rrufff who wrote (42)	1/2/2006 12:43:44 PM
From: rrm_bcnu	of 64

Agree completely. Good on ya Creede!

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read

To: rrm_bcnu who wrote (43)	1/2/2006 12:55:00 PM
From: jmhollen	of 64

Hey, it takes a lot of time and effort to just get a decent looking Board up and asse,ble some of the basic data required. It then becomes everyone's job to help out; hopefully 'moving right along ' in 'constructive' frame of mind vs. the "..Great PLNI Puke-Bash of 2005..". When we come across a major speed bump in the road - or the honeymoon appears to be over - it helps to point that out. John :-) .

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read

To: rrufff who wrote (42)	1/2/2006 1:13:09 PM
From: creede	of 64

Thank you. A few calls to management will perhaps straighten out the whole thing. They seem to be a new crew and this would be the perfect opportunity to show their new colors. GB+ND c

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (2)

To: creede who wrote (46)	1/2/2006 8:30:12 PM
From: jmhollen	of 64

Now, that sounds like a plan................ John :-) .

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: jmhollen who wrote (47)	1/2/2006 9:43:14 PM
From: stockster5	of 64

Well, here's some DD for you... theglobeandmail.com This is what most salvage firms face. And I believe that some of Cali people ARE still around, just on another masthead...pun intended. I read somewhere about another sub company of svxp with cali folks... I'll post the link as soon as I recall it. It does look questionable when a new handful of people take over, issues 250 billion shares right away, then dumps other officers off the boards.... Also, Cali has r/s's in it's history. Speaking of R/S, check out the back story of PCCR for maybe the record R/S's in a years time. Happy New Year all. S5

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (2)

To: stockster5 who wrote (48)	1/2/2006 10:22:14 PM
From: creede	of 64

Wow, awesome DD, awesome find. Well, at least it puts to bed the idea that they aren't really there trying to get the treasure. GB+ND c

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read

To: stockster5 who wrote (48)	1/2/2006 10:27:48 PM
From: jmhollen	of 64

Thanks for your input. Please check your SI MAIL in the toolbar above. As a non-subscriber you won't be able to respond with a PM, but I hope you'll find the info useful. John :-) .

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: jmhollen who wrote (50)	1/7/2006 6:02:52 PM
From: stockster5	of 64

I also think people should look at this link:http://www.otcbb.com/asp/info_center.asp?symbol=SVXP ... click 'filings' 8-k dated 10/27/05 Sub Document 2 page 1: Exchange ... This is the language of agreement of a reverse split. Whats not too clear is, are they svxp common shares, cali common or all preferred. Either way, this may be a factor in how long we hold svxp. It is for me. Usually, we don't get much heads up with r/s's. S5

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read

To: creede who wrote (46)	1/15/2006 8:09:05 PM
From: rrufff	of 64

Reverse Split Tuesday 1/1000 otcbb.com

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)

To: rrufff who wrote (52)	1/16/2006 12:48:34 PM
From: creede	of 64

I saw that on RB. Some as saying it's a good thing(probably a bagholder.lol). I just want to know how you knew it? Message 22020190 I thought that their O/S was about 2 mil....if the A/S is 250 billion, then why the r/s? Perhaps it is "the right kind of r/s". Thoughts anyone? GB+ND c

Share	RecommendKeepReply Mark as Last Read Read Replies (1)