SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

   Strategies & Market TrendsUS vs Amr Elgindy - Trial Transcripts


Previous 10 Next 10 
To: Patchie who wrote (78)12/5/2007 2:43:18 PM
From: SI Dave
   of 91
 
I already told you that the moderator banned you.

Soon I will disappear as censorship by a tool is irresponsible and thus not worth my time. LOL

Good call, and good riddance!

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: SI Dave who wrote (80)12/5/2007 3:46:48 PM
From: Dale Baker
   of 91
 
The idea that a thread is moderated by someone who never posts, never defines any TOU for the thread and is utterly unavailable to respond to criticisms of the moderation, does not pass the smell test for many of us.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Patchie who wrote (78)12/5/2007 4:48:33 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell
   of 91
 
Actually, it was Tony himself that banned you (via the moderator), not SI Dave. It would an incorrect assumption that there is no active participation by those two people. For the record, I've asked that you be unbanned, but it's not my call.

Placing blame on people for something they did not do and for reasons that are pure guesswork are why you have so little credibility here.

- Jeff

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Dale Baker who wrote (81)12/5/2007 4:58:14 PM
From: SI Dave
   of 91
 
Why so? There are tens of thousands of other boards on this very site. Many of the existing ones related to this topic have moderators many do not. For example:

siliconinvestor.com
siliconinvestor.com
siliconinvestor.com

Plus, there is no practical limit on the creation of new ones. Not meaning to state the obvious.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: SI Dave who wrote (83)12/5/2007 5:03:58 PM
From: Dale Baker
   of 91
 
Because it was on the short list of widely followed boards on SI. As a thread with much more cachet and interest than the 10,000+ others, it is distasteful to see the moderation completely arbitrary, blind and unaccountable.

This is not a procedural question - it's a "board quality" issue. The other top threads have well-known moderators with pretty clearly stated views on what flies and what won't on their threads.

I know much you guys would love to have Anthony back with all the attention his bellowing attracted. OTOH, if his appeal fails, the appeal of his thread and its importance on SI will keep fading. This issue may end up moot.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Dale Baker who wrote (84)12/5/2007 5:40:11 PM
From: SI Dave
   of 91
 
Be that as it may, that has always been a moderated, general topic board and bans were and remain pretty much the whim of the moderator.

Those privileges would have to be egregiously abused to warrant administrative intervention, which is (one of the) circumstances the complainant de jour frequently has trouble comprehending.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Patchie who wrote (78)12/6/2007 10:40:14 AM
From: Clase Azul
   of 91
 
I personally think its bullshit you got banished! I miss your conspiracy theories and your silly logic.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Patchie who wrote (78)12/7/2007 3:32:20 PM
From: Mighty_Mezz
   of 91
 
Which will be a cause for celebration by honest investors throughout cyberspace. Good riddance to bad rubbish!

re: Soon I will disappear...

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: ravenseye1/13/2008 5:38:39 PM
   of 91
 
Unsealed Testimony
Case 1:02-cr-00589-RJD Document 717 Filed 07/19/2007
Re: United States v. Amr I. Elgindy, et al. ~~ Criminal Docket No. 02 CR 589 (8-2) (RJD)
the details of the unsealed transcript clips are at the following links:
part 1
investigatethesec.com
part 2
investigatethesec.com
part 3
investigatethesec.com

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read


From: ravenseye12/18/2008 1:08:44 PM
1 Recommendation   of 91
 
ooops lost the appeal
lma(zz)o better luck next time!
ca2.uscourts.gov:8080/isysnative/RDpcT3BpbnNcT1BOXDA2LTQwODEtY3Jfb3BuLnBkZg==/06-4081-cr_opn.pdf

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)
Previous 10 Next 10