| To: deeno who wrote (5988) | 8/17/2001 1:49:22 PM | | From: AlienTech | | | | These guys cant even see 3 months ahead, let alone 2 years ahead..
>>We believe the stock remains undervalued trading at 22 times our 2003 earnings estimate.<<
You know, they can come lick my <insert word>. Year 2003?? They sure do have BALLS the size of the fat guys to be able to predict something not ONE year out, but TWO!.. Maybe they also give out free memberships to the psychics network. |
| | Network Associates (NET) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| To: deeno who wrote (5988) | 8/17/2001 1:50:36 PM | | From: AlienTech | | | | These guys cant even see 3 months ahead, let alone 2 years ahead..
>>We believe the stock remains undervalued trading at 22 times our 2003 earnings estimate.<<
You know, they can come lick my <insert word>. Year 2003?? They sure do have BALLS the size of the fat guys to be able to predict something not ONE year out, but TWO!.. Maybe they also give out free memberships to the psychics network.
While they are at it maybe they should mention its trading at quite a few numbers of the current years multiples. And think I know a few things MSDW stands for. |
| | Network Associates (NET) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| To: AlienTech who wrote (5990) | 8/17/2001 2:49:23 PM | | From: deeno | | | | | so do you still hold some of this stuff? I cant sell it all cause I like the security industry. I would find it interesting if indeed they really did have products worth buying. Certainly in the old days on this thread most software engineers seemed to sneer at their offerings compared to "best of breed" software. Might they really have put together a reasonable product line? |
| | Network Associates (NET) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| To: deeno who wrote (5991) | 8/17/2001 7:57:03 PM | | From: AlienTech | | | | Sure wish I knew. I got out here and am just thank full I got some money out. For a while there I thought it woudnt even be worth the paper. But with so many companies in the dumper, unless you have a big tax gain, why bother? Even CIEN is almost the same price. If I was going to take a risk here I would go for TLAB, CIEN, JNPR or one of the others showing promise when the market returns rather than hoping this can turn around. Its not market damage, its internal, much harder to fix that.
Oh the june 2001 issue of digit had an review of 18 antivirus programs. Considering they had it on the CD, they still gave a pretty bad review. The thing crashed on compressed files as before. And a B+ because it was easy to use and had good reporting. Only escan?? and quickheal?? came lower. Even the percent detected was like 91%. For the personal security stuff they gave rave reviews on free software and again personal firewall and pgp security came out looking pretty bad. Good to see some real comparisions from places that have no direct contact with the vendors for souped up reviews, they got a B and only neowatch?? and tiny firewall got lower scores. |
| | Network Associates (NET) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| To: AlienTech who wrote (5992) | 11/12/2001 12:04:18 PM | | From: deeno | | | | | Well this is weird, around july I beleive Morgan stanley put a buy on NETA then on september 24 they lowered the target price and earnings then on oct 9 they lowered opinion to reflect overvaluation and concern for the economy. now today Morgan reports that they have accumulated 10.29 % of the stock over 14,000,000 shares. any thoughts? |
| | Network Associates (NET) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1) |
|
| To: deeno who wrote (5997) | 1/19/2002 3:41:15 PM | | From: AlienTech | | | | | I havent really followed this company is years so have no clue. But looking at other companies like SYMC, it went form 8 to over 70 now. But I also know that SYMC did retain some intelligent folks through their problematic years to take up the reign after wards. NETA usually got rid of anyone who had 2 brain cells since marketting, lying and hyping ability were more important in the workforce. |
| | Network Associates (NET) | Stock Discussion ForumsShare | RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read |
|
| |